Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28764 invoked from network); 7 Jan 2002 14:38:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO warrior.services.quay.plus.net) (212.159.14.227) by excalibur.plus.net with SMTP; 7 Jan 2002 14:38:24 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: (qmail 15564 invoked from network); 7 Jan 2002 14:38:22 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by warrior.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 7 Jan 2002 14:38:22 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.33 #2) id 16Naqq-0003x6-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Mon, 07 Jan 2002 14:34:12 +0000 Received: from imo-d09.mx.aol.com ([205.188.157.41]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #2) id 16Naqp-0003wy-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 07 Jan 2002 14:34:11 +0000 Received: from G0MRF@aol.com by imo-d09.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v31_r1.9.) id l.136.6f2f3a1 (17526) for ; Mon, 7 Jan 2002 09:32:46 -0500 (EST) From: G0MRF@aol.com Message-ID: <136.6f2f3a1.296b0b8e@aol.com> Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 09:32:46 EST Subject: Re: LF: Re: GPS Coherent PSK Transmission To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 X-Mailer: AOL 6.0 for Windows UK sub 10510 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit In a message dated 1/7/02 9:13:15 AM GMT Standard Time, ACTALBOT@dstl.gov.uk writes:

So as far as we're concerned bandplans can go to the wall when this sort of requirement rears its head !

I hardly think a sub 0dBm ERP transmission is going to cause a problem to those wideband incoherent signallers !

I understood that the signals were in the middle of the band, at high power and at a weekend. The frequency limitations I can understand so I guess that's one out of three.

Thanks

David