Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-de06.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 07A4F380000B1; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 13:42:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Tlknq-0006Fy-M5 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 18:25:06 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Tlknq-0006Fp-4S for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 18:25:06 +0000 Received: from nm15.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com ([77.238.189.68]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1Tlknm-0008Kt-O1 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 18:25:05 +0000 Received: from [77.238.189.233] by nm15.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 20 Dec 2012 18:24:41 -0000 Received: from [212.82.108.117] by tm14.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 20 Dec 2012 18:24:41 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1026.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 20 Dec 2012 18:24:41 -0000 X-DKIM-Result: Domain=yahoo.co.uk Result=Good and Known Domain X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 147729.82628.bm@omp1026.mail.ird.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 55144 invoked by uid 60001); 20 Dec 2012 18:24:41 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.co.uk; s=s1024; t=1356027881; bh=cBJjLzkoQUFPLEwHSre2jTFy9zKAYZnd+1SVyyQIUOo=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=N4P8L2bOt6zqKQ+B+NIha4dpkarGfEeRU+EjDWKnWN7JPN2aRIuiaFs/pMgwHFNq6MP5VS/AQvhHrH8sdDDTXQ8mQcEpcXx3TcJdzQ+eIdrEo8gSpkA/eC+37VdhUB81pdfBhnp0q4XTXhUlEtNp3XKTzhigPhrz0sW+TV+UCzI= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.co.uk; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=zc0MvHJdBhA3RdHTR8TBcjHxeIH28eh4KMdwY+9G1jBlVCjgJYYi83OUrrzEKO0zn7WwSa+zYDIVe/qemCJI2NVa9yhRvBugswtFeKThyuNmqR5C9wSVFEfMGx0eNCVcHQjG61xe+TJY/Pxkon1k1IIDGExOO/p1G4Bz7xLsqh8=; X-YMail-OSG: J3PwGjMVM1nEW_oHJNgI5OYr.Okcj7pkpQWtLTkzCWrvzaZ gF2JyZJtalGSkXbhTX53SOvTrAin099bAJwsEdNveMzCVCtuno_KxMnG39gQ ZrxtAiFSZrFRzesBSuB0tReQIYP2eUdRgQ0Al8Jcw4MCTYfG9HJ7pB6ub0OF avJwB_AfrA4AGaImJxWEBzYNsgJ5pRKCMK1gMr6E1.H4xuCvbVn4nc._NSve Ceqfx7Z__PZU5eY8lxIwsQloT9keldocB1JkraXIqjSsYlNL_qNYY1l3IYEF xJYw4jY9rrH55tNhmcDvyvswlxN95iCTniykjZxSIugi55ls2eRIB8oV_rdi JcSDp3qrt.NxeRDqWcAcbOINUKm.okpoiB3zUNkev6LfqWMtyrHntnOv7TF3 zrl0gx9G4lJRfGCnh4JjvCC_f4.ghd0hqtVnKfEWAb5.tPq9a_kt5DFIRKWK 7jJR3B2nRLwh2T9bnuC0JZGqvQws- Received: from [31.51.111.241] by web133203.mail.ir2.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 18:24:40 GMT X-Rocket-MIMEInfo: 001.001,SGkgYWxsCsKgCkFzIGEgdmVyeSBlYXJseSBhZG9wdGVyIEkgaGF2ZSAyMHRoIERlYyAyMDEyIG9uIG15IE5vVidzIHNvIGRvIEkgaGF2ZSB0byBkb3duIGxvYWQgYSBuZXcgTm9WP8KgCsKgCkkgYW0gaGFwcHkgdG8gcGxheSB0aGUgZ2FtZSBidXQgbmVlZCBjbGVhciBhbmQgdW5lcXVpdm9jYWwgaW5zdHJ1Y3Rpb25zIGJlY2F1c2UgbXkgYnJhaW4gaHVydHMhCgoKVGhpcyBub3QgaW5kZW50ZWQgdG8gaHVydCB0aG9zZSB3aG8gaGF2ZSB3b3JrZWQgb24gdGhpcyB2ZXJ5IGhhcmQuLi4uLi4gYnV0IHRoYW5rIEcBMAEBAQE- X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.129.483 References: <1TlisQ-0d4JpA0@fwd11.t-online.de> <50D34621.4070805@gmail.com> <598519308-1356023657-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-1327427466-@b27.c4.bise7.blackberry> <50D349EB.5000109@gmail.com> Message-ID: <1356027880.50327.YahooMailNeo@web133203.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 18:24:40 +0000 (GMT) From: M0FMT To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" In-Reply-To: <50D349EB.5000109@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi all As a very early adopter I have 20th Dec 2012 on my NoV's so do I have to down load a new NoV? I am happy to play the game but need clear and unequivocal instructions because my brain hurts! This not indented to hurt those who have worked on this very hard...... but thank God our Government Departments are so obviously crass (no not the punks) otherwise this country would be unlivable in. Viz The BBC, Police and Mitchell, Hot pastie tax, Buzzards, Brock and his badger mates (Brian May etal)....... the list is entertainingly endless and to this we can now add the 472/9 and 60m NoV farce. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [77.238.189.68 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (m0fmt[at]yahoo.co.uk) 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 61577e2058c0d3bf1737d7de6ed6eb16 Subject: LF: As an early adopter ? Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="313692494-1806445717-1356027880=:50327" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.9 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_FONT_BIG, HTML_MESSAGE,TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40ce50d35c06529f X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : temperror --313692494-1806445717-1356027880=:50327 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi all=0A=A0=0AAs a very early adopter I have 20th Dec 2012 on my NoV's so = do I have to down load a new NoV?=A0=0A=A0=0AI am happy to play the game bu= t need clear and unequivocal instructions because my brain hurts!=0A=0A=0AT= his not indented to hurt those who have worked on this very hard...... but = thank God our Government Departments are so obviously crass (no not the pun= ks) otherwise this country would be unlivable in. Viz The=A0BBC, Police and= =A0Mitchell, Hot pastie tax, Buzzards, Brock=A0and his badger mates (Brian = May etal)....... the list is entertainingly endless and to this we can now = add the 472/9 and 60m NoV farce.=0A=0AI just wish they would fix the roads = though!=0A=0A73 es GL Pete M0FMT IO91UX=0A=0A=0A>__________________________= ______=0A> From: John Pumford-Green =0A>To: rsgb_lf_group= @blacksheep.org =0A>Sent: Thursday, 20 December 2012, 17:24=0A>Subject: Re:= LF: G3KEV and DK7FC in qso heard in JN68GN=0A> =0A>On 20/12/2012 17:14, j= ames.cowburn@virgin.net wrote:=0A>> And perhaps if a fuss hadn't been made = it may not have been noted?=0A>=0A>Unfortunately once of the consequences o= f the "mistake" could have led to illegal operation on 5MHz too - and unlik= e 472kHZ it's a bit more of a thorny area, what with it belonging to the Mo= D and all that. There is much potential for egg on face if the MoD decided = they didn't like the fact that RSGB/OFCOM had seemingly released the new al= locations early, by mistake. Not good for the image, in high circles, eh?= =0A>=0A>John=0A>GM4SLV=0A>=0A>=0A>=0A>=A0 --313692494-1806445717-1356027880=:50327 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi all
 
As a very early adopter I have 20th Dec 2012 on my NoV's so do I ha= ve to down load a new NoV? 
 
=
I am happy to play the game but need clear and unequivocal instru= ctions because my brain hurts!
 
<= div> 
This not indented= to hurt those who have worked on this very hard...... but thank God= our Government Departments are= so obviously crass (no not the punks) otherwise this country would be unlivable in. Viz The BBC, Pol= ice and Mitchell, Hot pastie tax, Buzzards, Brock and his badger mat= es (Brian May etal)....... the list is entertainingly endless and to this w= e can now add the 472/9 and 60m NoV farce.
 
I jus= t wish they would fix the roads though!
 
73 es GL= Pete M0FMT IO91UX
<= span style=3D"font-weight: bold;">From: John Pumford-Green <gm4slv@gmail.com>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Sent: Thursday, 20 December 2012, 17:24
Subject: Re: LF: G3KEV and DK7FC in qso = heard in JN68GN

On 20/12/2012 17:14, ja= mes.cowburn@virgin.net wrote:
> And perhaps if a fuss hadn't been= made it may not have been noted?

Unfortunately once of the conseque= nces of the "mistake" could have led to illegal operation on 5MHz too - and= unlike 472kHZ it's a bit more of a thorny area, what with it belonging to = the MoD and all that. There is much potential for egg on face if the MoD de= cided they didn't like the fact that RSGB/OFCOM had seemingly released the = new allocations early, by mistake. Not good for the image, in high circles, eh?

John
GM4SLV



 
=
--313692494-1806445717-1356027880=:50327--