Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mp04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 3E3D0380000E2; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 08:56:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Tlgax-0001V6-9V for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 13:55:31 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Tlgaw-0001Ut-KP for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 13:55:30 +0000 Received: from nm10.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com ([77.238.189.39]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1Tlgau-0006nf-Og for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 13:55:29 +0000 Received: from [212.82.105.245] by nm10.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 20 Dec 2012 13:55:07 -0000 Received: from [212.82.108.241] by tm17.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 20 Dec 2012 13:55:07 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1006.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 20 Dec 2012 13:55:07 -0000 X-DKIM-Result: Domain=yahoo.co.uk Result=Good and Known Domain X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 457233.44566.bm@omp1006.mail.ird.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 58127 invoked by uid 60001); 20 Dec 2012 13:55:07 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.co.uk; s=s1024; t=1356011707; bh=2EnijtrrKXnuLPIcdDFVL6hVKe/bX4Oo3HqER3TjaXQ=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=uAVD5Gja4CnV3Z4+5kz0WUnr+x8KMEteEEhryRBBiCtI47CDQrzBSxNsdbKh8afBulTj73jSEiGWzx4fcPPCapCGkwxZBAVg1PCrVLcDu8keGNsLYY2zc7hgk2FbAnfMquZCOneradI+TG08gQjBuk4VfGPy8cFh/oRUWna0gnk= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.co.uk; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=dNqDvRu3428r2dLuW/bNZLSQQHJ0zSqapZ4P9zzLiofY0dZOPasF+OvUVkXBUQZg0zBpQewS2+KM2guu+wdcY0N7y+LNmfW313JJR4zFPhR/O4F47G4onB1SyA0hcc920mIf1eUoExH7EIJ1PCwnINruzL7oUMNtrjDBuM5ELzg=; X-YMail-OSG: WD.LGx4VM1kso6pTKnaKHOMCroaoRAHyByKk5U1BiOEPppx pwybXjQzakTK8m715XwY3enJz_aUjyici2rexXgahzK1RYTatnjH3YFEICfE E7DUJS0gPUuaGCRTEfk_vdwsOINIzwlUhjIfpfXjuXB5joFntcP69zirr.7v VSEs6A9y_nxtmN98bZsEr1HGBZi9BnRLmrFJ534yXdnYQgv0TS2qq.4ymgZX s23gtJaB48wnHfHpb0_4vniQBVIzibDCYs7c1YFvxmI4A3w1GD.khkYjlzgs 4AKGPTxk3pfFDtbKGn6u7iv.rRf5AQ0NnBMA8PtICJc2mpsf8_pr_q3RGkJ5 67Ley1z9ScuHwIjTfBjxy5NrTd.UJbUGkYLVXbg55Yj_us764FiwLBKH9MSu VKYNo4TlGcGl_7AzkzZpFbO5WuBSCFx.rycvaSOjIcfhHSOQqZGCE29v6.VO Ro_5CclFo_tZn2d_.nuiz_7biJsA- Received: from [31.51.111.241] by web133204.mail.ir2.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 13:55:07 GMT X-Rocket-MIMEInfo: 001.001,CldlbGwgc2FpZCEKCsKgCjczIGVzIEdMIFBldGUgTTBGTVQgSU85MVVYCgoKPl9fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fCj4gRnJvbTogSm9obiBQdW1mb3JkLUdyZWVuIDxnbTRzbHZAZ21haWwuY29tPgo.VG86IHJzZ2JfbGZfZ3JvdXBAYmxhY2tzaGVlcC5vcmcgCj5TZW50OiBUaHVyc2RheSwgMjAgRGVjZW1iZXIgMjAxMiwgMTI6NTkKPlN1YmplY3Q6IFJlOiBMRjogTk9WIDQ3Mgo.ICAKPk9uIDIwLzEyLzIwMTIgMTI6NTEsIERBVkUgUElDSyB3cm90ZToKPj4gSW1wb3J0YW50IG5vdGUKPj4BMAEBAQE- X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.129.483 References: <001e01cddea6$9598aa00$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <50D2FB08.3000704@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <003401cddea9$2d337a00$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <50D30B9E.8080305@gmail.com> Message-ID: <1356011707.42865.YahooMailNeo@web133204.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 13:55:07 +0000 (GMT) From: M0FMT To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" In-Reply-To: <50D30B9E.8080305@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Well said! 73 es GL Pete M0FMT IO91UX > > From: John Pumford-Green >To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >Sent: Thursday, 20 December 2012, 12:59 >Subject: Re: LF: NOV 472 > >On 20/12/2012 12:51, DAVE PICK wrote: >> Important note >> >> Please note that the 5MHz and 472-479kHz NoVs can be applied for at any >> time but do not come into effect until 1 January 2013. >> >> >> Copied from the RSGB NOV page... >> > > >What counts in legal terms though - a notice on the RSGB's website or >the actual document bearing OFCOM's "stamp"? > >I'd say the Notice of Variation itself is what determines what is allowed. > >I'd also say that the person who knocked up the web application service >made an error and the "Valid From" date should have been set, in the >software that processes the applications, to be : > >"January 1st 2013 or date of application, whichever is the latest". > >Nonetheless, the legal document called a Notice of Variation is quite >clear, and nowhere in the W/T act does it say you must take notice of a >few lines of text on the RSGB's website. > >John >GM4SLV > >>> >> > > > > > [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [77.238.189.39 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (m0fmt[at]yahoo.co.uk) 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 7ab87d4d3ea1d9dcb73a78e83fe4d608 Subject: Re: LF: NOV 472 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="856002529-1108814385-1356011707=:42865" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.9 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_FONT_BIG, HTML_MESSAGE,TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mtain-mp04.r1000.mx.aol.com ; domain : yahoo.co.uk DKIM : fail x-aol-sid: 3039ac1dc14850d3190b23a9 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none --856002529-1108814385-1356011707=:42865 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =0AWell said!=0A=0A=A0=0A73 es GL Pete M0FMT IO91UX=0A=0A=0A>______________= __________________=0A> From: John Pumford-Green =0A>To: r= sgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org =0A>Sent: Thursday, 20 December 2012, 12:59=0A>= Subject: Re: LF: NOV 472=0A> =0A>On 20/12/2012 12:51, DAVE PICK wrote:=0A>= > Important note=0A>>=0A>> Please note that the 5MHz and 472-479kHz NoVs ca= n be applied for at any=0A>> time but do not come into effect until 1 Janua= ry 2013.=0A>>=0A>>=0A>> Copied from the RSGB NOV page...=0A>>=0A>=0A>=0A>Wh= at counts in legal terms though - a notice on the RSGB's website or =0A>the= actual document bearing OFCOM's "stamp"?=0A>=0A>I'd say the Notice of Vari= ation itself is what determines what is allowed.=0A>=0A>I'd also say that t= he person who knocked up the web application service =0A>made an error and = the "Valid From" date should have been set, in the =0A>software that proces= ses the applications, to be :=0A>=0A>"January 1st 2013 or date of applicati= on, whichever is the latest".=0A>=0A>Nonetheless, the legal document called= a Notice of Variation is quite =0A>clear, and nowhere in the W/T act does = it say you must take notice of a =0A>few lines of text on the RSGB's websit= e.=0A>=0A>John=0A>GM4SLV=0A>=0A>>>=0A>>=0A>=0A>=0A>=0A>=0A> --856002529-1108814385-1356011707=:42865 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Well said!

 
73 es GL Pete M= 0FMT IO91UX
From: John Pumford-Green <gm4slv@g= mail.com>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Se= nt: Thursday, 20 December 2012, 12:59
Subject: Re: LF: NOV 472

= On 20/12/2012 12:51, DAVE PICK wrote:
> Important note
>
>= ; Please note that the 5MHz and 472-479kHz NoVs can be applied for at any> time but do not come into effect until 1 January 2013.
>
&g= t;
> Copied from the RSGB NOV page...
>


What counts = in legal terms though - a notice on the RSGB's website or
the actual do= cument bearing OFCOM's "stamp"?

I'd say the Notice of Variation itse= lf is what determines what is allowed.

I'd also say that the person = who knocked up the web application service
made an error and the "Valid= From" date should have been set, in the
software that processes the ap= plications, to be :

"January 1st 2013 or date of application, whichever is the latest".

Nonetheless, the legal document called a = Notice of Variation is quite
clear, and nowhere in the W/T act does it = say you must take notice of a
few lines of text on the RSGB's website.<= br>
John
GM4SLV

>>
>




--856002529-1108814385-1356011707=:42865--