Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mj01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 3D32838000094; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 19:18:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TZ9cO-0004Po-BM for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 16 Nov 2012 00:17:12 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TZ9cN-0004Pf-9v for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 16 Nov 2012 00:17:11 +0000 Received: from nm7-vm0.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com ([77.238.189.222]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TZ9cL-0000Hy-0H for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 16 Nov 2012 00:17:10 +0000 Received: from [212.82.105.245] by nm7.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 16 Nov 2012 00:17:07 -0000 Received: from [212.82.108.251] by tm17.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 16 Nov 2012 00:17:07 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1016.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 16 Nov 2012 00:17:07 -0000 X-DKIM-Result: Domain=yahoo.co.uk Result=Good and Known Domain X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 517800.21968.bm@omp1016.mail.ird.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 57541 invoked by uid 60001); 16 Nov 2012 00:17:07 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.co.uk; s=s1024; t=1353025027; bh=YN3IguC8jeDHRvSrM5Qz8/hhlKq6FltvtHRQTBlRcnY=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=yfiMFNoghc+kTgPdoAajDCf53zd2Lz8/19BhDvb2jVyXy5vnNdst1Eqbh45iaq7iK92z+nBn+G2AbOSFoZi5YmUJFBn+9kwEu06mTO/6M+hBnIQgAbvRUyMEghU8fQmNiyVHmRJ5tQp+4mD/I2Fq4FyBkPsd356l2qIYITfGXCo= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.co.uk; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=pEvraMgyCljKIn3c5HPto/konliml0tkqzOvkNZdGma02XPE+4/rh3OXMFBOyOM5A229gf7ZyuDoBSG0PwKn24l9Kwo6Tz+oFRwNnNmlVxuPzde0gy1G1L40d8qEZphb43hF1M67ezNwpUeO9PfZbIJfLuJ/aXg1m3yw9LwYIIA=; X-YMail-OSG: WYqZW3kVM1kZ0oAto5szBZJwUH56ykALnwzQvPWjIT051yB 23IckJvq9HTerAlcMUvhvbTvVOuww2goIBp5Y0YcAQ7aTiArFw_J2e0xcrkD kccFT0Evt3s06DWBftO4oTM6VXW78C7O25eeA02JhYHD0LvtXdKy.gh8VXhL qazrAn3gaANpXucPtgfKCf2lM0lL6onTs71EcbAIEGrBZ0HQXIMmaasCqUJE 61U6r_FQqbqD_PZy5ACIOuXh2e5i_cbGOIVIHN0uSlRwvRM97ZMvgguNZMXY dyJuG7pgMeaBumoZ7.c6squhN6HjDlEDRxZRbmwRHtwh8OkgtEIvkh6x_yeR jlpu9HKcqEF8HYsy34BK9._GGvPbtKfur5h.nYnAez1EP7ZxyLQGyxWKajBN 8zfJ4VI3AwEBIcazXBCHZG61537B1_tTAEBB.yhPvNU5ouRL4amWldBnu9S3 hkzB0ueiCnBTE8wCE6RxQR6BVPEk- Received: from [81.129.111.217] by web133201.mail.ir2.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 16 Nov 2012 00:17:07 GMT X-Rocket-MIMEInfo: 001.001,SGkgYWxsCsKgClN0ZWZhbiB3YXMgYSBnb29kIHNpZ25hbCBoZXJlIHRvbmlnaHQgYnV0IG5vIHRha2VycyB3aGlsZSBJIHdhcyBsaXN0ZW5pbmcuCsKgCldoYXQgcG93ZXIgYW5kIGFudD8KCjczIGVzIEdMIFBldGUgTTBGTVQgSU85MVVYCgoKPl9fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fCj4gRnJvbTogU3RlZmFuIFNjaMOkZmVyIDxTdGVmYW4uU2NoYWVmZXJAaXVwLnVuaS1oZWlkZWxiZXJnLmRlPgo.VG86IHJzZ2JfbGZfZ3JvdXBAYmxhY2tzaGVlcC5vcmcgCj5TZW50OiBUaHVyc2RheSwgMTUBMAEBAQE- X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.123.460 References: <50A54D79.60406@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <50A55960.4050304@freenet.de> <50A55E02.70807@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Message-ID: <1353025027.51770.YahooMailNeo@web133201.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 00:17:07 +0000 (GMT) From: M0FMT To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" In-Reply-To: <50A55E02.70807@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 1.3 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi all Stefan was a good signal here tonight but no takers while I was listening. What power and ant? 73 es GL Pete M0FMT IO91UX > > From: Stefan Schäfer >To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >Sent: Thursday, 15 November 2012, 21:26 >Subject: Re: LF: MF CW? > >Hi Wolf, > >Thanks for the report. >Well there is some QRN again from north Africa - south Italy. No one seems to be active tonight. But i like the heat in the shack, currently heating 2.5 kW although the shack is in the building... Reading some 630m articles about QSOs with DF0WD, as shown some minutes ago. Currently i'm reading a bit on the MF website of DL4YHF. And the CW keyer by DL4YHF is running endless CQ calls :-) >Actually i am QSK here, very comfortable! :-) > >Can't you heat your shack at DF0WD? Do you have any new plans for your MF stuff there? And what about a remote TX keying system? The band is somehow very exciting even if no one answers :-) > >I've asked 9H1ES and 9H1CG for a sked on 630m. Who knows, maybe i will hear them later... > > >73, Stefan/DK7FC > >Am 15.11.2012 22:06, schrieb wolf_dl4yhf: >> Hi Stefan, >> >> Your CW signal comes 'crashing through the local QRM'. Currently listening with an indoor wire antenna, SDR-IQ, and the signal is Q5 without any sign of QSB. >> >> Too cold and unpleasant here to spend the evening at the club station, so I'm restricted to "rx only". >> >> 73, >> Wolf . >> >> Am 15.11.2012 21:15, schrieb Stefan Schäfer: >>> Anyone interested in a CW QSO? >>> I'm calling for some time on 472.2 kHz... >>> >>> 73, Stefan >>> >>> >>> >> > > > > [...] Content analysis details: (1.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [77.238.189.222 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (m0fmt[at]yahoo.co.uk) 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 1.3 RCVD_IN_RP_RNBL RBL: Relay in RNBL, https://senderscore.org/blacklistlookup/ [77.238.189.222 listed in bl.score.senderscore.com] 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 61577e2058c0d3bf1737d7de6ed6eb16 Subject: Re: LF: MF CW? Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="1982344905-794904418-1353025027=:51770" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE, TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mtain-mj01.r1000.mx.aol.com ; domain : yahoo.co.uk DKIM : fail x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d7b9550a586535c66 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none --1982344905-794904418-1353025027=:51770 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi all=0A=A0=0AStefan was a good signal here tonight but no takers while I = was listening.=0A=A0=0AWhat power and ant?=0A=0A73 es GL Pete M0FMT IO91UX= =0A=0A=0A>________________________________=0A> From: Stefan Sch=E4fer =0A>To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org =0A>= Sent: Thursday, 15 November 2012, 21:26=0A>Subject: Re: LF: MF CW?=0A> =0A= >Hi Wolf,=0A>=0A>Thanks for the report.=0A>Well there is some QRN again fro= m north Africa - south Italy. No one seems to be active tonight. But i like= the heat in the shack, currently heating 2.5 kW although the shack is in t= he building... Reading some 630m articles about QSOs with DF0WD, as shown s= ome minutes ago. Currently i'm reading a bit on the MF website of DL4YHF. A= nd the CW keyer by DL4YHF is running endless CQ calls :-)=0A>Actually i am = QSK here, very comfortable! :-)=0A>=0A>Can't you heat your shack at DF0WD? = Do you have any new plans for your MF stuff there? And what about a remote = TX keying system? The band is somehow very exciting even if no one answers = :-)=0A>=0A>I've asked 9H1ES and 9H1CG for a sked on 630m. Who knows, maybe = i will hear them later...=0A>=0A>=0A>73, Stefan/DK7FC=0A>=0A>Am 15.11.2012 = 22:06, schrieb wolf_dl4yhf:=0A>> Hi Stefan,=0A>> =0A>> Your CW signal comes= 'crashing through the local QRM'. Currently listening with an indoor wire = antenna, SDR-IQ, and the signal is Q5 without any sign of QSB.=0A>> =0A>> T= oo cold and unpleasant here to spend the evening at the club station, so I'= m restricted to "rx only".=0A>> =0A>> 73,=0A>>=A0 Wolf .=0A>> =0A>> Am 15.= 11.2012 21:15, schrieb Stefan Sch=E4fer:=0A>>> Anyone interested in a CW QS= O?=0A>>> I'm calling for some time on 472.2 kHz...=0A>>> =0A>>> 73, Stefan= =0A>>> =0A>>> =0A>>> =0A>> =0A>=0A>=0A>=0A> --1982344905-794904418-1353025027=:51770 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi all
=
 
Stefan was a good signal here toni= ght but no takers while I was listening.
&nbs= p;
What power and ant?
73 es GL Pete M= 0FMT IO91UX
From: Stefan Sch=E4fer <Stefan.= Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
Sent: Thursday, 15 November 2012, 21:26
Subject: Re: LF: MF CW?

Hi Wolf,

Thanks for the report.
Well there is some= QRN again from north Africa - south Italy. No one seems to be active tonig= ht. But i like the heat in the shack, currently heating 2.5 kW although the= shack is in the building... Reading some 630m articles about QSOs with DF0= WD, as shown some minutes ago. Currently i'm reading a bit on the MF websit= e of DL4YHF. And the CW keyer by DL4YHF is running endless CQ calls :-)
= Actually i am QSK here, very comfortable! :-)

Can't you heat your sh= ack at DF0WD? Do you have any new plans for your MF stuff there? And what about a remote TX keying system? The band is somehow very exciting even if= no one answers :-)

I've asked 9H1ES and 9H1CG for a sked on 630m. W= ho knows, maybe i will hear them later...


73, Stefan/DK7FC
Am 15.11.2012 22:06, schrieb wolf_dl4yhf:
> Hi Stefan,
>
= > Your CW signal comes 'crashing through the local QRM'. Currently liste= ning with an indoor wire antenna, SDR-IQ, and the signal is Q5 without any = sign of QSB.
>
> Too cold and unpleasant here to spend the eve= ning at the club station, so I'm restricted to "rx only".
>
> = 73,
>  Wolf .
>
> Am 15.11.2012 21:15, schrieb Ste= fan Sch=E4fer:
>> Anyone interested in a CW QSO?
>> I'm c= alling for some time on 472.2 kHz...
>>
>> 73, Stefan>>
>>
>>
>



=
--1982344905-794904418-1353025027=:51770--