Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dg01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 0E59B380000B2; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 12:01:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SkH9D-0006uw-Tw for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 17:00:47 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SkH9D-0006uY-9G for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 17:00:47 +0100 Received: from nm23-vm6.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com ([212.82.109.235]) by relay1.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SkH9B-0003dG-3M for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 17:00:46 +0100 Received: from [77.238.189.230] by nm23.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 28 Jun 2012 16:00:44 -0000 Received: from [212.82.108.244] by tm11.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 28 Jun 2012 16:00:44 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1009.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 28 Jun 2012 16:00:44 -0000 X-DKIM-Result: Domain=yahoo.com Result=Good and Known Domain X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 32968.73374.bm@omp1009.mail.ird.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 27340 invoked by uid 60001); 28 Jun 2012 16:00:43 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1340899243; bh=MfJat80jGGT8TFb0FEwRLWgS/jxMWZY/re0R/2zNcQM=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=mlcjz/iSlA8GMn37UFAV2SdzRcAlyj9MtwgU7dPEP4pEHXDg9+cQbMp9po0n6BAwzF4Gp30pq7oqYcYW4O3+nAQTsmtquASuqLdikxXM2zE/zntRYf4njkDfycHRxzHNJkdzhb9GnVzvH50ag65irFAFUlybXeLWfx3EEkDmPxY= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=SVQ+UhNGhZ+/Vnygm+bJAgXDtAoOy2ShzHYRIPtsVf0r60uB6ibjnxJfPcMV7O2LPJX9cBsjbTeogNSrrsbnwJ65vum3qXzA4jf8KYjWNcic/7eoym6U5m+CIPWmWg9DBN2pvFN8v/SRUG+n4s49tITuMNk3xuD3dRGGNqJMDwQ=; X-YMail-OSG: 32dnt18VM1kjx9Y8E5_JpEdRkIDEKiKYVvVQLfmfZxzYt6b pklsfmPg_m0gEQWnoFFMZDVgBuXSL0qIBs6h7FwYxGpkYW9UHodrntyyt2uL 0oOiYgW9rzG6hE6VTFiQEQTT._78_lkF21cfVaoYrPmi7wMTEzCvx8EWqWgD 1wrQJYGOiCKmzNJH0aDsaqzUCnl5qs.zOLV.9CqFI2lDoO7iHVhckLC7ZA5M 4CIY5D7T_gI_3Jx_F7wViotd6hr1b3rRnrqkpfTogr6hxafySvF.uP9DyG67 cNWWH8hEF3myPubl.2XcBK2b6VsiLgsvqJo8q8Ybf5T9q46tjIst1C18e3q5 TNxHRo0JWTvYvtoZi8d_EkEMN2L.4PBAtcwTHvuydKiwX3k0U5gjGN_KoGs8 BNImwIsUCKqqMBCl7jf0kSJtoIB70TDIiJEKaE7MP3aMS5L8cf01dsZA4pne .5aV3v3zT6vl.bfKWyPaCH9.IJV4H5UBulNvf5cbvKXkr_r2JOn7Y Received: from [151.99.187.181] by web29502.mail.ird.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 17:00:43 BST X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.118.349524 References: <1474092.1340466836144.JavaMail.root@wamui-june.atl.sa.earthlink.net> <1340474829.4474.YahooMailNeo@web29504.mail.ird.yahoo.com> <1340892687.85075.YahooMailNeo@web29503.mail.ird.yahoo.com> <1340892873.80692.YahooMailNeo@web29505.mail.ird.yahoo.com> <4FEC7008.9010001@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <4FEC76C8.9040700@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Message-ID: <1340899243.16908.YahooMailNeo@web29502.mail.ird.yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 17:00:43 +0100 (BST) From: Daniele Tincani To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" In-Reply-To: <4FEC76C8.9040700@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello Stefan, your hand-sketched schematics (and also the way you built the antenna, etc.) look just like my idea of the final result I would like to obtain. BTW I still have some BF862s from my experiments with your VLF E-probe :-) I think I would try to replicate your example. 73 Daniele IZ5WWB [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [212.82.109.235 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (danieletincani[at]yahoo.com) -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 60b21f5b7eb190e65b65540006a87038 Subject: Re: LF: Coupling a LF resonant ferrite rx antenna Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="671563967-845364515-1340899243=:16908" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.0 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD,HTML_20_30, HTML_MESSAGE,TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:422868032:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-m419.1 ; domain : yahoo.com DKIM : fail x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d41094fec7fea7e72 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none --671563967-845364515-1340899243=:16908 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello Stefan, your hand-sketched schematics (and also the way you=A0built= =A0the antenna,=A0etc.)=A0look just like my idea of the final result I woul= d like to obtain. BTW I still have some BF862s from my experiments with you= r VLF E-probe :-) I think I would try to replicate your example.=0A73=0ADan= iele IZ5WWB=0A =0A=0A________________________________=0A Da: Stefan Sch=E4f= er =0AA: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.or= g =0AInviato: Gioved=EC 28 Giugno 2012 17:22=0AOggetto: Re: LF: Coupling a = LF resonant ferrite rx antenna=0A =0A=0A =0APS: For a 50 Ohm output, just = 2 or 3 turns on the out-coupling winding=0Awas the best choice for my ferri= te antenna.=0A=0AAm 28.06.2012 16:54, schrieb Stefan Sch=E4fer: =0A Hi Dani= ele.=0A>=0A>If your RX is successful enough, maybe a simple transformer wor= ks well. =0A>=0A>Apply a test signal by using a loop, say 20cm diameter, in= ductively=0Acoupling to the ferrite. Then use a secondary winding which goe= s=0Adirectly to the coax of the RX. Use a 50 Ohm resistor or an=0Aoscillosc= ope with a 50 Ohm input directly. Adjust the number of turns=0Ato get a max= imum signal voltage on the scope. The match also strongly=0Adepends on the = position of this secondary winding on the coil. The=0Aimpedance becomes low= er when you come closer to the center of the rod. =0A>=0A>The will affect t= he Q of the resonated system. So you may build an=0Aarrangement which allow= s you to move and fix the secondary coil on the=0Arod. If the signal is str= ong enough, maybe from a nearby BCD station,=0Ayou can reduce the "gain" a = bit. I have done it similarly with my=0Aactive ferrite antenna, see https:/= /dl.dropbox.com/u/19882028/LF/DK7FC_LF_p_active_ferrite_antenna.JPG=0A>=0A>= 73, Stefan/DK7FC=0A>=0A>=0A>Am 28.06.2012 16:14, schrieb Daniele Tincani: = =0A>Hello LF, =0A>>=0A>>=0A>>it seems I managed to build a pretty good ferr= ite coil (abot=0A80=0Aturns of Litz wire over a bundle of=A0seven 20cmx1cm = rods). Nulling and=0Apeaking seem acceptable for my purposes. With current = var cap, tuning=0Arange is about 160-650 kHz and could=A0easily be moved to= lower=0Afrequencies by adding a parallel fixed capacitor. Until now I have= only=0Amade some quick tests by inductively coupling the coil with the=0Ai= nternal ferrite of a portable radio. I would like now to make the antenna s= uitable also for=0Adirect connection with a 50 ohm input. What do you sugge= st: to add for=0Aexample a transformer or a buffer amplifier (or both :-))?= If a=0Atransformer is recommended, is it advisable to use the main coil as= the=0Aprimary winding? =0A>>=0A>>73 =0A>>Daniele IZ5WWB =0A>> --671563967-845364515-1340899243=:16908 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello Stefan, your hand-sketched schematics (and also the way you bu= ilt the antenna, etc.) look just like my idea of the final r= esult I would like to obtain. BTW I still have some BF862s from my experime= nts with your VLF E-probe :-) I think I would try to replicate your example= .
73
Daniele IZ5WWB

<= font size=3D"2" face=3D"Arial">
= Da: Stefan Sch=E4fer <Stefan.Sc= haefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
= A: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Inviato: Gioved=EC 28 Giugno 2012 17:22
Oggetto: Re: LF: Coupling a LF reso= nant ferrite rx antenna

=0A=0A=0A=0A =0A= =0A
=0APS: For a 50 Ohm output, just 2 or 3 turns on the out-coupling w= inding=0Awas the best choice for my ferrite antenna.
=0A
=0AAm 28.06.= 2012 16:54, schrieb Stefan Sch=E4fer:=0A
=0A=0A = =0A =0AHi Daniele.
=0A
=0AIf your RX is successful = enough, maybe a simple transformer works well.=0A
=0A
=0AApply a = test signal by using a loop, say 20cm diameter, inductively=0Acoupling to t= he ferrite. Then use a secondary winding which goes=0Adirectly to the coax = of the RX. Use a 50 Ohm resistor or an=0Aoscilloscope with a 50 Ohm input d= irectly. Adjust the number of turns=0Ato get a maximum signal voltage on th= e scope. The match also strongly=0Adepends on the position of this secondar= y winding on the coil. The=0Aimpedance becomes lower when you come closer t= o the center of the rod.
=0A
=0AThe will affect the Q of the reson= ated system. So you may build an=0Aarrangement which allows you to move and= fix the secondary coil on the=0Arod. If the signal is strong enough, maybe= from a nearby BCD station,=0Ayou can reduce the "gain" a bit. I have done = it similarly with my=0Aactive ferrite antenna, see=0A htt= ps://dl.dropbox.com/u/19882028/LF/DK7FC_LF_p_active_ferrite_antenna.JPG=
=0A
=0A73, Stefan/DK7FC
=0A
=0A
=0AAm 28.06.2012 16:1= 4, schrieb Daniele Tincani:=0A
=0A
=0A=
Hello LF,
=0A
=0A
=0A=
=0A
=0A
=0A
 <= /div>=0A
it seems I managed to build a pretty good ferrite coil (ab= ot=0A80=0Aturns of Litz wire over a bundle of seven 20cmx1cm rods). Nu= lling and=0Apeaking seem acceptable for my purposes. With current var cap, = tuning=0Arange is about 160-650 kHz and could easily be moved to lower= =0Afrequencies by adding a parallel fixed capacitor. Until now I have only= =0Amade some quick tests by inductively coupling the coil with the=0Aintern= al ferrite of a portable radio. I would like now to make the antenna suitable also for=0Adirect connectio= n with a 50 ohm input. What do you suggest: to add for=0Aexample a transfor= mer or a buffer amplifier (or both :-))? If a=0Atransformer is recommended,= is it advisable to use the main coil as the=0Aprimary winding?
=0A =
 
=0A
73
=0A
Daniele IZ5WWB
=0A =
 
=0A
=0A
=0A
=0A
=0A =
=0A
=0A
=0A
=0A
=0A=0A

--671563967-845364515-1340899243=:16908--