Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dg02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id CAB2038000097; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 16:09:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Setrg-0003hW-AQ for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 21:08:28 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Setrf-0003hM-Ds for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 21:08:27 +0100 Received: from nm12.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com ([77.238.189.65]) by relay1.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1Setrd-0005fE-Do for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 21:08:26 +0100 Received: from [77.238.189.232] by nm12.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 13 Jun 2012 20:08:24 -0000 Received: from [212.82.108.118] by tm13.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 13 Jun 2012 20:08:24 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1027.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 13 Jun 2012 20:08:24 -0000 X-DKIM-Result: Domain=yahoo.com Result=Good and Known Domain X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 454201.50915.bm@omp1027.mail.ird.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 77250 invoked by uid 60001); 13 Jun 2012 20:08:24 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1339618104; bh=Ay95Fl6vALsDNvUE00n0LQlXwYdLktR/runE1DVjwn8=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=1Wco3lPZD3SVNf8bg13h3zJde9KL99kNDJAAT+Z/oXJksf2CjI3G8HlLMwMjSrmjJregI+9YmypJh011M7HWIkP62gqjbcFNKfX6scmkMgBEDzDrtSQABksLq4OxJFolqNCUZ5cAEFCThI+rVNtnFDsxBXx15Y9ws9o7Hx+rAmE= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=DFh5ZzelXEw22Wy5HalPYaeQAm1s9udyzTQZbsLTyXALM3xwcE8bWDDHZSW/jNuVBOuRJJfvj4XTLcGeex2lwm1mLVYU06eOctQ5YY8ND/GHDN/K4JQdz0zGPFr4RI9aMx3M5y5LB8EZCQddzlCV0TYhxRYsd/Hv60+6j9EasXI=; X-YMail-OSG: K5lNfucVM1l8I4sG6zRG5xznCu9.nvB6TmDb9xaxuVpFawZ OiVA8xDMviSJ4nOr_9MTFEzLsORSPiHxNSaIOcQVi9oty7kikSbldCeTzU2O IsSamfBAfosJO_OJJMC78RvOr3kqjms7DP33O52vr_y84jMp9jGKCwrZ4wPy 0I.KeyTq9oedZQ2UiMdOeLeENM5LDt15OCK.4o1ZljITQoW2NX43Hyg7l5qF b2JX4uJsFvNyz0wQ8AcClp2mEBsb2felIl3HEOHe1LX6ad4szPYuMJY2scac KeIjw12JVRcrzWTKurvCcZICDkbAzVh7JBeOoIx0blbpISgjHg6Aac0u77K5 7d8o9yMAGr1oFppuXM6tJ32B3FVDlEIEvsXGcecwZHc49LLV6Xps61IznaNt x0Iqmi4hw9LsBRYYIThf0jqQ6dE4i83nG_xWnvEo7 Received: from [87.3.206.238] by web29503.mail.ird.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 21:08:24 BST X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.118.349524 References: <16BC8B3CA8672445BC2A29B4C14A26D4379ED2AAB4@exlnmb01.eur.nsroot.net> <4DF9EFD1.5010208@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <1313780109.51443.YahooMailNeo@web111907.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <9CD1E11E8BC9402CB4AECECAC4088443@JimPC> <1314394178.5030.YahooMailNeo@web111905.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <1314641183.5605.YahooMailNeo@web111910.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <4E5CBC9A.5020900@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <1314705226.37125.YahooMailNeo@web111901.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <4E5CF192.3040905@legal-medicine.de> <1317076720.22768.YahooMailNeo@web29509.mail.ird.yahoo.com> <1317077173.13177.YahooMailNeo@web29509.mail.ird.yahoo.com> <1317119515.35504.YahooMailNeo@web29502.mail.ird.yahoo.com> <97A4CD4629F94A90A7F5AFD6E2A17E73@JimPC> <1317287203.84598.YahooMailNeo@web29516.mail.ird.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <1339618104.65016.YahooMailNeo@web29503.mail.ird.yahoo.com> Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 21:08:24 +0100 (BST) From: Daniele Tincani To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" In-Reply-To: <1317287203.84598.YahooMailNeo@web29516.mail.ird.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello LF, looking at this very interesting graph: http://df3lp.de/misc/hga22/ my understanding is that summer nights - though shorter than winter ones - could be better for reception of LF signals in terms of signal strenght. Is this conclusion correct? Thanks 73 D. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [77.238.189.65 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (danieletincani[at]yahoo.com) -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 FSL_FREEMAIL_2 FSL_FREEMAIL_2 0.0 FSL_FREEMAIL_1 FSL_FREEMAIL_1 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: e90dcb17768c7e768f13e0721cc1c0c7 Subject: LF: Best annual period for listening to LF Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-73641666-699257366-1339618104=:65016" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.3 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD,HTML_30_40, HTML_MESSAGE,TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:347220416:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-d018.2 ; domain : yahoo.com DKIM : fail x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d410a4fd8f3643b1c X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none ---73641666-699257366-1339618104=:65016 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =A0=0AHello LF,=0A=A0=0Alooking at this very interesting graph:=0A=A0=0Ahtt= p://df3lp.de/misc/hga22/=0A=A0=0Amy understanding is that summer nights - t= hough shorter than winter ones - could be better for reception of LF signal= s in terms of signal strenght. Is this conclusion correct?=0A=A0=0AThanks= =0A73=0AD. ---73641666-699257366-1339618104=:65016 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
&nbs= p;
Hello LF,
 
looking at this very inte= resting graph:
 
 
my unders= tanding is that summer nights - though shorter than winter ones - could be = better for reception of LF signals in terms of signal strenght. Is this con= clusion correct?
 
Thanks
73
D= .
 
---73641666-699257366-1339618104=:65016--