Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-de02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 57D543800008C; Sun, 6 May 2012 12:42:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SR4WR-0007AN-Qu for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 06 May 2012 17:41:23 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SR4WQ-0007AE-Pw for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 06 May 2012 17:41:22 +0100 Received: from nm8-vm0.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com ([77.238.189.203]) by relay1.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SR4WO-0001ft-Fz for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 06 May 2012 17:41:21 +0100 Received: from [77.238.189.231] by nm8.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 06 May 2012 16:41:19 -0000 Received: from [212.82.108.250] by tm12.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 06 May 2012 16:41:19 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1015.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 06 May 2012 16:41:19 -0000 X-DKIM-Result: Domain=yahoo.co.uk Result=Good and Known Domain X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 537702.36795.bm@omp1015.mail.ird.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 65975 invoked by uid 60001); 6 May 2012 16:41:19 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.co.uk; s=s1024; t=1336322479; bh=GcYMeZTSXe3l8DFNES1G4M0m2RlcWmdTPp1Ea4IAS8A=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=jTIQSGxc6UgZ7uNZRJs1xlH35Wyursesrilw6fCIiTGctTV3V/b82ShvItKj7ujk71o/NNMnxEdeQeKwS10QjsnyLCb248cd8LADwqKjn6EZr/9z5+oO4u96IIGN+I48Wgp5JBY7luM8lT/V6K3kkZBM2VmISX5U/ahzs8B/q1w= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.co.uk; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=T6h3fePzOKfXSXrXuvGo+Fptnf5LcGB18SPo4G5T1XfOESl03cZ+MdQh0/A5K8EzhgHbIrhdWNHdv4ffRs//Q7lNY790hHXfycnTa+OE0GW4/6hBSIb94cTR1/8H1tjwbUod/6gXLA11Dvp4fjiApNv95BBL87qY9xS6JUJgcWg=; X-YMail-OSG: PwSf2zUVM1kGYVBZXmH1RACoAGRNejWoWtQ9QSpoN5bOLzg DiHc5tWuDp4MbAxMUDagOHQOqIfScRLFDeiGjFXi2KAZOfSB6FW0xzEmyEbR FPF069HNzCx1Yvt0FjLPEYPA30zcj3BAWq_wYYT.lEM2werpP_YzCj4JM1gH eRLC2okdKfKf9KOMQe9yeZ_sYk1pJ0Y1tnfyIro7bH6sR3w3rOuB6GGMvdqL nnfGjepoeSDwAr7VWpSOf.rjGj1KQ52162TpIF9_Iw80D1VdYq1xRx6EmoGk ObL1osxEP21FVC9jeQAF7dbAR5WXx5tFu9JYHkhV8xHQwoHTlTz7Ejrv38EX hC2B4wUEbk23MPSmhfe_kYsJrbD1nib_xc.WRWVN89.iKiLHNJylPynbhwVR 5skdSkhbShLjTQGO6ihaxnfz.jQ4EcqpsM_LkhGXFTzuCrSSCk9KOMQ-- Received: from [86.164.69.113] by web171601.mail.ir2.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 06 May 2012 17:41:19 BST X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.117.340979 References: <9802437CA37C4ABF886C9AD8D1817A15@IBM7FFA209F07C> Message-ID: <1336322479.54110.YahooMailNeo@web171601.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> Date: Sun, 6 May 2012 17:41:19 +0100 (BST) From: M0FMT To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" In-Reply-To: <9802437CA37C4ABF886C9AD8D1817A15@IBM7FFA209F07C> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Chris. Just can't stand "Fence sitters"! 73 es GL Pete M0FMT IO91UX From: Chris To: RSGB LF Group Sent: Sunday, 6 May 2012, 16:41 Subject: LF: Rot [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [77.238.189.203 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (m0fmt[at]yahoo.co.uk) 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 290c8768709872f914a4ca71ad6bfe49 Subject: Re: LF: Rot Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-1613889061-1321869371-1336322479=:54110" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE, TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:413122304:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-a417.2 ; domain : yahoo.co.uk DKIM : fail x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40ca4fa6a9f85785 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none ---1613889061-1321869371-1336322479=:54110 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =0AChris.=0AJust can't stand "Fence sitters"!=0A=0A73 es GL Pete M0FMT IO91= UX=0A=0A=0A________________________________=0A From: Chris =0ATo: RSGB LF Group =0ASent: Sun= day, 6 May 2012, 16:41=0ASubject: LF: Rot=0A =0A=0A =0AWhat a lot of rot = I am reading on this site about =0AMicrosoft! =0ASuch as "threat =0Athat Mi= crosoft are attempting=0A=A0in their quest for dominance" =0AWe should be g= rateful to Microsoft for the superb =0Aposition we are in today with comput= ing, not only in progress terms, but what do =0Ayou think the situation wou= ld now be if=A0instead numerous smaller companies =0Awere all trying to pus= h their own, all different, systems on an equal =0Abasis?? =0AConsider what= it would be like if different towns =0Ahad a different system for traffic = lights.... =0AChris, G4AYT. ---1613889061-1321869371-1336322479=:54110 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Chris.
Just can't stand "Fence sitters"!
73 es GL Pete= M0FMT IO91UX
From: Chris <c.ashby435@btinternet.com>
= To: RSGB LF Group <rsg= b_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Se= nt: Sunday, 6 May 2012, 16:41
Subject: LF: Rot

=0A=0A =0A =0A=0A=0A
=0A
What a lot of rot I am reading on this site about =0AMicroso= ft!
=0A
Such as "threat =0Athat Microsoft are attempting
=  in their quest for dominance"<= /font>
=0A
We should be gra= teful to Microsoft for the superb =0Aposition we are in today with computin= g, not only in progress terms, but what do =0Ayou think the situation would= now be if instead numerous smaller companies =0Awere all trying to pu= sh their own, all different, systems on an equal =0Abasis??
=0A=
Consider what it would be like if diff= erent towns =0Ahad a different system for traffic lights....
= =0A
Chris, G4AYT.
=0A=


---1613889061-1321869371-1336322479=:54110--