Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25])
	by mtain-ma01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id E7EAE3800008C;
	Fri, 19 Aug 2011 19:28:47 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14)
	id 1QuYTR-0003zf-CF
	for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 20 Aug 2011 00:27:37 +0100
Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net)
	by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14)
	id 1QuYTQ-0003zV-CR
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 20 Aug 2011 00:27:36 +0100
Received: from nm28-vm0.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com ([98.139.91.234])
	by relay1.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.63)
	(envelope-from <danieletincani@yahoo.com>)
	id 1QuYTO-0004o7-UR
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 20 Aug 2011 00:27:36 +0100
Received: from [98.139.91.67] by nm28.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 19 Aug 2011 23:27:26 -0000
Received: from [98.139.91.53] by tm7.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 19 Aug 2011 23:27:26 -0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1053.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 19 Aug 2011 23:27:26 -0000
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 964922.89209.bm@omp1053.mail.sp2.yahoo.com
Received: (qmail 571 invoked by uid 60001); 19 Aug 2011 23:27:26 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1313796446; bh=jZJdPB7YuAxyJYU9kofMvkrDSHL0E4M2l1nfY+SQhBQ=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=mXFJ/3GOR/7VvTig/YtkafTX94nvjCMBCKDXP/3EowAC+XNZui0RY94GRpPiAz92wY7G7vQwtYU7YqLblvTj+3qL5+ErwiS3z7p/lbQDnRRTFvxk8nJV4D2bSVJCMLt76UXwhkShGpXZgN0pjPfT+GmpqXY0igtBFYUTnpTVZbk=
DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
  h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type;
  b=onY7gL/Dd9s7482TU1qSV83fTnKb5uV2EAXtzDYVtKAbtrQ66DoLeBNX9QTiiCK/ZTvBXBoXBe2SC64BZ1EV4XJfKxuwO6ikZ5APTdseA9v8TJUL9UMfUPN1EtLOFSafq5Ps0oLVxLBfiKFSxQLWviu2NmtjqolGqD3JNf4bj18=;
X-YMail-OSG: DEkJwlwVM1nqk_LiSi1Uxv3hrW5W8ophNmEilr.lqTqOc7s
 vq.UBR4ZnYv7sqhj2Y0oMyxM1GDmOo8DjNWDK3cxsmZUCC_elRhwC8RmHPEU
 Um5VBESV7gGglsEkD6VjWj5TOUGbxHNS6K9Dal7RPg8KaRdD.fGprwGvxdzr
 P0VY9KzB3mZUDzzWKZ3WJO7ikyEn5vP_jMj7j35bamXUYb11BbYerh87stRe
 lrkRoRNNXfUhbooCHAX3gtY3CmN7f8Bo78UJ0Dk1hfUPCCjLi691hKY4FDTK
 NBmk0b_dMhttJNEQ.fHB4DI5Axs_nsF6C_Te7mboJmi4RT3zEdyE7dfEmBwX
 j18as4rvofGBoZPR_.sgkq4PCzyz7zejIlnw6Rgj5fDJ_Og--
Received: from [87.3.20.14] by web111904.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 16:27:26 PDT
X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.113.313619
References: <1QuXrB-0vDGu80@fwd17.t-online.de>
Message-ID: <1313796446.88869.YahooMailNeo@web111904.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 16:27:26 -0700 (PDT)
From: Daniele Tincani <danieletincani@yahoo.com>
To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
In-Reply-To: <1QuXrB-0vDGu80@fwd17.t-online.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
DomainKey-Status: good (testing) 
X-Spam-Score: 1.4 (+)
X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,HTML_TINY_FONT=1.425
Subject: Re: LF: Ferrite wideband antennas?
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-2037099156-1313796446=:88869"
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.0 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD,HTML_20_30,
	HTML_MESSAGE,TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL autolearn=no version=2.63
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false
x-aol-global-disposition: G
X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:489706336:93952408  
X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0  
X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-d221.1 ; domain : yahoo.com DKIM : fail  
x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60094e4ef1af08db
X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25
X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none


--0-2037099156-1313796446=:88869
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello Ha-Jo,=0A=A0=0Ayes now I see your point, thanks.=0A=A0=0ABest regards=
=0ADaniele=0A=0AFrom: "hajo.brandt.dj1zb@t-online.de" <hajo.brandt.dj1zb@t-=
online.de>=0ATo: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=0ASent: Saturday, August 20, =
2011 12:47 AM=0ASubject: Re: LF: Ferrite wideband antennas?=0A=0A=0A T-Onli=
ne eMail Dear Daniele,=0A=0AI guess the=0Ainformation =0AYou want is also c=
ontained in my email, at least indirectly.=0A=0AA=0Agerman =0Areceive-only =
radio amateur has built such a ferrite antenna by cut and=0Atry only =0Aand=
 finally succeeded to receive VLF with a ferrite rod combined from=0Aserver=
al =0Aferrite parts and has written an article about this in the german rad=
io=0Aamateur =0Amagazine cq-DL. He described his rod according to its dimen=
sions and=0Anumber of =0Aturns but did not give its inductivity; at that ti=
me he could not=0Ameasure it. We =0Ahave been in email concact for some tim=
e on the subject of inductive=0Abroadband =0Aantennas, and I have encourage=
d him to buy a Rohde & Schwarz LARU=0Awhich had =0Abeen offered to him. Now=
 he knows the=A0inductivity of 3 mH which he=0Ahad =0Aachieved!=A0=0A=0AFin=
ally he has kept this ferrite antenna=0Aand=A0some =0Aothers=A0for higher f=
requencies for portable use. But for his=0Ahome =0Ainstallation he has adop=
ted the principle of using a wire loop (even=0Alarger than =0Amine) and a t=
ransformer to the 50 ohms cable. I have found my dimension=0Arules =0Afor l=
oops by using the ARRL Radio =0ADesigner.=A0=0A=0AOK?=0A=0A73 Ha-Jo, DJ1ZB=
=0A=0A=0A"Daniele=0A=0ATincani" <danieletincani@yahoo.com> schrieb: =0AHell=
o Ha-Jo, =0A>=A0 =0A>thank you for your reply, which contains many interest=
ing  information. =0A>=A0 =0A>However, please note that my question was spe=
cifically=0Aabout the  possibility to realize wideband rx antennas on ferri=
te=0Acores. =0A>=A0 =0A>Best regards =0A>Danile =0A>=0A> =0A>From: "hajo.br=
andt.dj1zb@t-online.de"  <hajo.brandt.dj1zb@t-online.de>=0A>To: rsgb_lf_gro=
up@blacksheep.org=0A>Sent: Friday, August 19, 2011=0A11:58  PM=0A>Subject: =
Re: LF:=0AFerrite  wideband antennas?=0A>=0A>=0A>Dear Daniele,=0A>=0A>At my=
 locaton in eastern Bavaria I=0Aam using =0A  such a vertical broadband loo=
p pointing north from 10 kHz to 500 kHz =0A  since=A0several years and have=
 also made experiments with a=0Ahorizontal loop =0A  covering 1,8 to 30 MHz=
.=0A>=0A>Their principle is as =0A  follows:=0A>=0A>A=A0broadband transform=
er is needed between the=0Aloop =0A  and=A0the cable going into the shack.=
=0A>Without such a transformer=0Athe =0A  loop inductivity has to be so hig=
h=A0when feeding usual cable=0Aimpedances =0A  that a ferrite core will be =
needed to realize the inductivity needed=0Afor =0A  broadband performance. =
I have used wire loops only so far.=0A>=0A>The=0A=0A  inductive reactance o=
f the secondary of this transformer should be 4=0Atimes the =0A  cable impe=
dance (3.2 mH for 10 kHz). The loop=0Acircumference=A0should be low =0A  in=
 length compared to=A0a quarter of the highest frequency (for VLF=0Ato MF =
=0A  usually no problem, for HF the=A0circumference had been 2 =0A  meters)=
.=0A>=0A>The=A0inductivity of the primary of the broadband =0A  transformer=
 should be equal to the inductivity of the loop (in my =0A  case=A030uH and=
 17 meters circumference for 10 to 500=0AkHz).=0A>=0A>When =0A  meeting the=
se conditions, the inductive reactance of the loop itself =0A  will=A0alway=
s be=A0higher by a factor of 4 at least compared=0Ato=A0the =0A  cable impe=
dance transformed down by the turns ratio. This=A0is the=0A=0A  condition f=
or the loop to operate broadband.=0A>=0A>But the problem=0Afor the =0A  rec=
eiver may come in the shack: It must be capable of taking all =0A  the=A0po=
wer delivered by the broadband loop, including the power=0Areceived =0A  by=
 broadcast transmitters! Otherwise the receiver may be overloaded=0Aand may=
 =0A  need a more linear frontend=A0or has to be equipped with a good=0Afro=
nt end =0A  selectivity.=A0=A0=A0 =0A>=0A>AT VLF to MF a long=0Acable into =
=0A  the shack usually will be no problem because of its low attenuation at=
=0Alow =0A  frequencies, therefore all additional selectivity I can provide=
 in the=0Ashack. =0A  For HF and higher the situation is different of cours=
e and may need at=0Aleast =0A  part of selectivity and preamplification alr=
eady at the loop =0A  output.=0A>=0A>For the time being however, I have pro=
blems using my=0Aloop for =0A  the reception of SAQ, since a solar panel ha=
d been installed on a roof=0Atwo =0A  houses from here,=A0in autumn 2010. O=
bviously the chopper of this =0A  installation is generating a strong=A0300=
 Hz spectrum up to 20 kHz=0Ain my =0A  loop. As I could clear=A0interferenc=
e into my active antenna =0A  completely=A0the interfering field should=A0b=
e=0Ainductive.=A0It seems =0A  to come from several directions (including t=
he wiring of three houses=0Abecause =0A  the=A0installation is=A0feeding=A0=
three phase=0Acurrent=A0into the =0A  mains)!=A0=A0=0A>=0A>OK?=0A>=0A>73 Ha=
-Jo, =0A  DJ1ZB=A0=A0=0A>=0A>=0A>"Daniele Tincani" =0A  <danieletincani@yah=
oo.com> schrieb: =0A>Hello LF, =0A>>=0A>>a very interesting discussion is i=
n progress on the reflector=0Aon  ferrite rx antennas. My understanding how=
ever is that until now we=0Ahave been  talking about narrow-band antennas. =
May I ask the experts if a=0Awide-band  ferrite antenna could be feasible, =
able=A0to=A0(partially)=0Amatch the  "panoramic" approach of SDR receivers,=
 at least in the LF/NDB and/or=0AMW  bands? Such an "ideal" antenna would c=
ombine some advantages of=0Aair-cored  loops with a=A0reduced size (uhm... =
too "ideal" to be real=0A:-)) =0A>>=0A>>Regards =0A>>Daniele =0A>>=A0  =0A>=
=0A>=A0  
--0-2037099156-1313796446=:88869
Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<html><body><div style=3D"color:#000; background-color:#fff; font-family:ar=
ial, helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:10pt"><div><span>Hello Ha-Jo,</span></=
div><div><span></span>&nbsp;</div><div><span>yes now I see your point, than=
ks.</span></div><div><span></span>&nbsp;</div><div><span>Best regards</span=
></div><div><span>Daniele</span></div><div><br></div><div style=3D"font-fam=
ily: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;"><div style=3D"font-fam=
ily: times new roman, new york, times, serif; font-size: 12pt;"><font size=
=3D"2" face=3D"Arial"><div style=3D"margin: 5px 0px; padding: 0px; border: =
1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); height: 0px; line-height: 0; font-size: 0px;"=
 class=3D"hr" contentEditable=3D"false" readonly=3D"true"></div><b><span st=
yle=3D"font-weight: bold;">From:</span></b> "hajo.brandt.dj1zb@t-online.de"=
 &lt;hajo.brandt.dj1zb@t-online.de&gt;<br><b><span style=3D"font-weight: bo=
ld;">To:</span></b> rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org<br><b><span style=3D"font-=
weight:
 bold;">Sent:</span></b> Saturday, August 20, 2011 12:47 AM<br><b><span sty=
le=3D"font-weight: bold;">Subject:</span></b> Re: LF: Ferrite wideband ante=
nnas?<br></font><br><meta content=3D"off" http-equiv=3D"x-dns-prefetch-cont=
rol"><div id=3D"yiv1314606362">=0A<title>T-Online eMail</title>=0A=0A =0A =
=0A=0A=0A<font face=3D"Arial Black"><font size=3D"2"><b><font color=3D"#000=
000">Dear Daniele,<br><br>I guess the=0Ainformation =0AYou want is also con=
tained in my email, at least indirectly.<br><br>A=0Agerman =0Areceive-only =
radio amateur has built such a ferrite antenna by cut and=0Atry only =0Aand=
 finally succeeded to receive VLF with a ferrite rod combined from=0Aserver=
al =0Aferrite parts and has written an article about this in the german rad=
io=0Aamateur =0Amagazine cq-DL. He described his rod according to its dimen=
sions and=0Anumber of =0Aturns but did not give its inductivity; at that ti=
me he could not=0Ameasure it. We =0Ahave been in email concact for some tim=
e on the subject of inductive=0Abroadband =0Aantennas, and I have encourage=
d him to buy a Rohde &amp; Schwarz LARU=0Awhich had =0Abeen offered to him.=
 Now he knows the&nbsp;inductivity of 3 mH which he=0Ahad =0Aachieved!&nbsp=
;<br><br>Finally he has kept this ferrite antenna=0Aand&nbsp;some =0Aothers=
</font>&nbsp;for higher frequencies for portable use. But for his=0Ahome =
=0Ainstallation he has adopted the principle of using a wire loop (even=0Al=
arger than =0Amine) and a transformer to the 50 ohms cable. I have found my=
 dimension=0Arules =0Afor loops by using the ARRL Radio =0ADesigner.&nbsp;<=
br></b><br></font></font><font size=3D"2" face=3D"Arial Black">OK?<br><br>7=
3 Ha-Jo, DJ1ZB<br><br></font><br>"Daniele=0A=0ATincani" &lt;danieletincani@=
yahoo.com&gt; schrieb: =0A<blockquote style=3D"padding-right: 0px; padding-=
left: 5px; margin-right: 0px; margin-left: 5px; border-left-color: rgb(0, 0=
, 0); border-left-width: 2px; border-left-style: solid;">=0A  <div style=3D=
"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size:=
 10pt; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">=0A  <div><span>Hello Ha-Jo,<=
/span></div>=0A  <div><span></span>&nbsp;</div>=0A  <div><span>thank you fo=
r your reply, which contains many interesting =0A  information.</span></div=
>=0A  <div><span></span>&nbsp;</div>=0A  <div><span>However, please note th=
at my question was specifically=0Aabout the =0A  possibility to realize wid=
eband rx antennas on ferrite=0Acores.</span></div>=0A  <div><span></span>&n=
bsp;</div>=0A  <div><span>Best regards</span></div>=0A  <div><span>Danile</=
span></div>=0A  <div><br></div>=0A  <div style=3D"font-family: arial, helve=
tica, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;">=0A  <div style=3D"font-family: times n=
ew roman, new york, times, serif; font-size: 12pt;"><font size=3D"2" face=
=3D"Arial">=0A  <div style=3D"margin: 5px 0px; padding: 0px; border: 1px so=
lid rgb(204, 204, 204); height: 0px; line-height: 0; font-size: 0px;" class=
=3D"yiv1314606362hr"></div><b><span style=3D"font-weight: bold;">From:</spa=
n></b>=0A"hajo.brandt.dj1zb@t-online.de" =0A  &lt;hajo.brandt.dj1zb@t-onlin=
e.de&gt;<br><b><span style=3D"font-weight: bold;">To:</span></b> =0A  rsgb_=
lf_group@blacksheep.org<br><b><span style=3D"font-weight: bold;">Sent:</spa=
n></b> Friday, August 19, 2011=0A11:58 =0A  PM<br><b><span style=3D"font-we=
ight: bold;">Subject:</span></b> Re: LF:=0AFerrite =0A  wideband antennas?<=
br></font><br>=0A  =0A  <div id=3D"yiv1314606362"><font face=3D"Arial Black=
"><font size=3D"2"><font color=3D"#000000">Dear Daniele,<br><br>At my locat=
on in eastern Bavaria I=0Aam using =0A  such a vertical broadband loop poin=
ting north from 10 kHz to 500 kHz =0A  since&nbsp;several years and have al=
so made experiments with a=0Ahorizontal loop =0A  covering 1,8 to 30 MHz.<b=
r><br>Their principle is as =0A  follows:<br><br>A&nbsp;broadband transform=
er is needed between the=0Aloop =0A  and&nbsp;the cable going into the shac=
k.<br>Without such a transformer=0Athe =0A  loop inductivity has to be so h=
igh&nbsp;when feeding usual cable=0Aimpedances =0A  that a ferrite core wil=
l be needed to realize the inductivity needed=0Afor =0A  broadband performa=
nce. I have used wire loops only so far.<br><br>The=0A=0A  inductive reacta=
nce of the secondary of this transformer should be 4=0Atimes the =0A  cable=
 impedance (3.2 mH for 10 kHz). The loop=0Acircumference&nbsp;should be low=
 =0A  in length compared to&nbsp;a quarter of the highest frequency (for VL=
F=0Ato MF =0A  usually no problem, for HF the&nbsp;circumference had been 2=
 =0A  meters).<br><br>The&nbsp;inductivity of the primary of the broadband =
=0A  transformer should be equal to the inductivity of the loop (in my =0A =
 case&nbsp;30uH and 17 meters circumference for 10 to 500=0AkHz).<br><br>Wh=
en =0A  meeting these conditions, the inductive reactance of the loop itsel=
f =0A  will&nbsp;always be&nbsp;higher by a factor of 4 at least compared=
=0Ato&nbsp;the =0A  cable impedance transformed down by the turns ratio. Th=
is&nbsp;is the=0A=0A  condition for the loop to operate broadband.<br><br>B=
ut the problem=0Afor the =0A  receiver may come in the shack: It must be ca=
pable of taking all =0A  the&nbsp;power delivered by the broadband loop, in=
cluding the power=0Areceived =0A  by broadcast transmitters! Otherwise the =
receiver may be overloaded=0Aand may =0A  need a more linear frontend&nbsp;=
or has to be equipped with a good=0Afront end =0A  selectivity.&nbsp;&nbsp;=
&nbsp;</font> <br><br>AT VLF to MF a long=0Acable into =0A  the shack usual=
ly will be no problem because of its low attenuation at=0Alow =0A  frequenc=
ies, therefore all additional selectivity I can provide in the=0Ashack. =0A=
  For HF and higher the situation is different of course and may need at=0A=
least =0A  part of selectivity and preamplification already at the loop =0A=
  output.<br><br>For the time being however, I have problems using my=0Aloo=
p for =0A  the reception of SAQ, since a solar panel had been installed on =
a roof=0Atwo =0A  houses from here,&nbsp;in autumn 2010. Obviously the chop=
per of this =0A  installation is generating a strong&nbsp;300 Hz spectrum u=
p to 20 kHz=0Ain my =0A  loop. As I could clear&nbsp;interference into my a=
ctive antenna =0A  completely&nbsp;the interfering field should&nbsp;be=0Ai=
nductive.&nbsp;It seems =0A  to come from several directions (including the=
 wiring of three houses=0Abecause =0A  the&nbsp;installation is&nbsp;feedin=
g&nbsp;three phase=0Acurrent&nbsp;into the =0A  mains)!&nbsp;&nbsp;<br><br>=
OK?<br><br>73 Ha-Jo, =0A  DJ1ZB&nbsp;&nbsp;<br></font></font><br><br>"Danie=
le Tincani" =0A  &lt;danieletincani@yahoo.com&gt; schrieb: =0A  <blockquote=
 style=3D"padding-right: 0px; padding-left: 5px; margin-right: 0px; margin-=
left: 5px; border-left-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); border-left-width: 2px; border-=
left-style: solid;">=0A    <div style=3D"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: =
arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt; background-color: rgb(255, 2=
55, 255);">=0A    <div>Hello LF,</div>=0A    <div>&nbsp;</div>=0A    <div>a=
 very interesting discussion is in progress on the reflector=0Aon =0A    fe=
rrite rx antennas. My understanding however is that until now we=0Ahave bee=
n =0A    talking about narrow-band antennas. May I ask the experts if a=0Aw=
ide-band =0A    ferrite antenna could be feasible, able&nbsp;to&nbsp;(parti=
ally)=0Amatch the =0A    "panoramic" approach of SDR receivers, at least in=
 the LF/NDB and/or=0AMW =0A    bands? Such an "ideal" antenna would combine=
 some advantages of=0Aair-cored =0A    loops with a&nbsp;reduced size (uhm.=
.. too "ideal" to be real=0A:-))</div>=0A    <div>&nbsp;</div>=0A    <div>R=
egards</div>=0A    <div>Daniele</div>=0A    <div>&nbsp;</div></div></blockq=
uote><font color=3D"#000000" size=3D"3" face=3D"Arial">&nbsp;</font> =0A  <=
div></div></div>=0A=0A  <br><br></div></div></div></blockquote><font color=
=3D"#000000" size=3D"3" face=3D"Arial">&nbsp;</font> =0A<div></div> =0A</di=
v><meta content=3D"on" http-equiv=3D"x-dns-prefetch-control"><br><br></div>=
</div></div></body></html>
--0-2037099156-1313796446=:88869--