Return-Path: Received: from mtain-mh07.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-mh07.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.96.219]) by air-dc09.mail.aol.com (v127_r1.1) with ESMTP id MAILINDC094-86a74b92bc121f2; Sat, 06 Mar 2010 15:33:22 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mtain-mh07.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 389C338000084; Sat, 6 Mar 2010 15:33:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1No0fq-0001IH-Nl for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 06 Mar 2010 20:32:34 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1No0fq-0001I8-6L for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 06 Mar 2010 20:32:34 +0000 Received: from smtp5.freeserve.com ([193.252.22.151] helo=smtp6.freeserve.com) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1No0fn-0002Q2-LD for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 06 Mar 2010 20:32:34 +0000 Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf3508.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id C2478700008C for ; Sat, 6 Mar 2010 21:32:25 +0100 (CET) Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf3508.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id B6628700008F for ; Sat, 6 Mar 2010 21:32:25 +0100 (CET) Received: from AGB (unknown [91.109.7.50]) by mwinf3508.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with SMTP id 35235700008C for ; Sat, 6 Mar 2010 21:32:23 +0100 (CET) X-ME-UUID: 20100306203223217.35235700008C@mwinf3508.me.freeserve.com Message-ID: <12CE76AAB3CA46D9AA320C0522B6EEED@AGB> From: "Graham" To: References: <9afca2641003061120o7d50442ax1348688d91fa3c04@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <9afca2641003061120o7d50442ax1348688d91fa3c04@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2010 20:32:22 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8089.726 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8089.726 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 100306-0, 06/03/2010), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001 Subject: Re: LF: Why is this group not a Yahoo group with archives and web access? Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0008_01CABD6C.1FF04C80" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE, MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60db4b92bc1060a9 X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 ------=_NextPart_000_0008_01CABD6C.1FF04C80 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Perhaps Some thing's are best kept out of sight ... ? G ..=20 From: Roger Lapthorn=20 Sent: Saturday, March 06, 2010 7:20 PM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Subject: LF: Why is this group not a Yahoo group with archives and web= access? Although I enjoy this group it would be much better if it was a Yahoo= Group. Why? 1.. Messages can be read on-line if preferred and it is not necessar= y to download messages to a mail programme.=20 2.. Files could be stored - useful for circuits, written reports, pd= f documents etc 3.. Photos could be stored on the group website (massive 100GB stora= ge!) 4.. All messages are archived and can be searched easily, even years= later 5.. Messages can be filtered/moderated if needed and offenders banne= d=20 6.. Databases can be created=20 7.. Pages of useful links can be created=20 8.. Moderation is easy and can be done by several individuals. 9.. Messages can still be received as emails if preferred.=20 10.. Polls can be created etc etc I have run a couple of Yahoo Groups now for several years (Miracle Whi= p and VHFam) and there have been absolutely no problems at all. The fi= rst has over 1100 members and the second around 200. So, my question is why don't we set one up and all migrate? I think ev= eryone would benefit. 73s Roger G3XBM --=20 http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/ http://www.g3xbm.co.uk http://www.youtube.com/user/G3XBM G3XBM GQRP 1678 ISWL G11088 ------=_NextPart_000_0008_01CABD6C.1FF04C80 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Perhaps  Some thing's are best= kept out of=20  sight ... ?
 
G ..

Sent: Saturday, March 06, 2010 7:20 PM
Subject: LF: Why is this group not a Yahoo group with arch= ives and=20 web access?

Although I enjoy this group it would be much better if= it was a=20 Yahoo Group. Why?
  1. Messages can be read on-line if preferred and it is not necessar= y to=20 download messages to a mail programme.=20
  2. Files could be stored - useful for circuits, written reports, pd= f=20 documents etc
  3. Photos could be stored on the group website (massive 100GB stora= ge!)
  4. All messages are archived and can be searched easily, even years= later
  5. Messages can be filtered/moderated if needed and offenders banne= d=20
  6. Databases can be created=20
  7. Pages of useful links can be created=20
  8. Moderation is easy and can be done by several individuals.
  9. Messages can still be received as emails if preferred.=20
  10. Polls can be created
     = etc=20 etc

I have run a couple of Yahoo Groups now for several years= (Miracle=20 Whip and VHFam) and there have been absolutely no problems at all. The= first has=20 over 1100 members and the second around 200.

So, my question is= why don't=20 we set one up and all migrate? I think everyone would=20 benefit.

73s
Roger G3XBM

--

http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/
http://www.g3xbm.co.uk
http://www.youtube.com/us= er/G3XBM
G3XBM=20    GQRP 1678      ISWL G11088


------=_NextPart_000_0008_01CABD6C.1FF04C80--