From: Rick Wakatori <7l1rll@dp.u-netsurf.ne.jp>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
In-Reply-To: <4C872B44.4030706@telus.net>
References: <4C872B44.4030706@telus.net>
Organization: RLL
Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2010 16:14:10 +0900
Message-Id: <1283930050.6221.41.camel@vaio3rd>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: LF: Asia Pacific Band Planning...
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org


Hi Scott,
  I am neither a representative of JARL nor a representative of 2200m
band funs in Japan. I think both the RSGB' band plan and a candidate
of RSGB band plan have to be concidered as a base of our activities in
conjunction with transpacific or transcontinent communication.
73,
7L1RLL Rick 

On Wed, 2010-09-08 at 06:20 +0000, Scott Tilley wrote:
> Gentlemen with the usual Mal exception...
> 
> Recent testing with JA has brought forward the issue of band planning on 
> 2200m for the Asia Pacific region.  After some discussion among some 
> parties it is clear we need to consult with anyone with an interest 
> before making any suggestions.
> 
> Anyone with an interest, would you be so kind as to comment on band 
> planning with respect to transpacific, Western North America, South 
> America, Oceania and Eastern Asia?
> 
> We would like to dialog with all colleagues about the best way to ensure 
> that local and DX experimentation coordinates with already existing 
> protocols or determine where we need to create new ones.
> 
> Comments from ALL interested parties would be appreciated.
> 
> Kinda nice we're concerned about such issues isn't it!
> 
> 73 Scott
> VE7TIL
> 
> 
> 
>