Return-Path: <owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25])
by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id x0HDWKdl009726
for <rlg@klubnl.pl>; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 14:32:32 +0100
Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14)
id 1gk7fk-00069t-Qv
for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 13:25:28 +0000
Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net)
by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14)
id 1gk7fe-00069k-Gs
for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 13:25:22 +0000
Received: from mail-wr1-x434.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::434])
by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256)
(Exim 4.91)
(envelope-from <dead.fets@gmail.com>)
id 1gk7fc-0006NQ-Kz
for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 13:25:21 +0000
Received: by mail-wr1-x434.google.com with SMTP id t6so10944720wrr.12
for <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 05:25:20 -0800 (PST)
X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
h=date:from:reply-to:message-id:to:subject:in-reply-to:references
:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=2fCnalmXDwDHXCeTktYLjulRm0V63ZYL1PHIPhaU9vU=;
b=cFuZ6NKDdUQVLU2oPwZHyOVGTdEURefiSMGl1bMoB2vrNU9GXIaLk627VjfWGspkGi
oHI/xkkrdD5SilhOSzBtq2+58gcA+UPpDHtCxKHJuKZFTae6cpOf7EBW3oCKpH2QgoAZ
5qNWcbsZklrK/L25+RvxNzrqlTpAA/t8i2Li8Y8cXDLyI8X5VbzTHpXYA/wc03CIJdVG
e6qL35PnwQe+sRcHPiy8dfbl3t7zEQqZ0850klbGdw6b/LJK30iSSR1TL8m+M4G/QOic
e1FCSP+joh5haf+7IMhBjMHd0wVBKulPHsEITtwsCmNT0SRa5vSNCswkPXZbHpCUBFzo
WzsA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:reply-to:message-id:to:subject
:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=2fCnalmXDwDHXCeTktYLjulRm0V63ZYL1PHIPhaU9vU=;
b=r7mrg2kkKpENkDOjGTG3L4xMVNV3sbHfQ6Aa7Cy5LMy36dTi6Q+mt2LvUPfDj3+w+z
iV7PWusc4CjGRSlF/lgiZ8EURR1W43bDyrleZNtd42jBSgqBuRlMTUuJ0S60x6veVLVF
qsNtSt7z4qsUIGetRD085swwb1/XxNPfsEc7nZVuKU5kPrjUR7znhdBa4hF6Y/4Vs6Iw
uRABLWD9uuU1h1eNZkYrHlZIMHjkbWaXURsa5QqGLnHLfIKf/650b1qagdLSVRFnDv1d
bv/GxaYmQUtUz24Jj67exZGKmMYL1+B3PekY7y8zMN99By0CA7JsAr5qLrdTo1bP4Qzc
F0cA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukceAaxDAInlOHp4tGhxOoUykXS5OBuG7zHTxGIf0/B3OvQ8cSSo
jiLa1ApwCUv2PMERhu7Ii7t45KHP
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN6REjgQfuUHjzd6dPncojlVlX6RFDc6COJEqXvrvutDIj8qT2LDMzFssncTJVr2XptYwxiVDA==
X-Received: by 2002:adf:dfd1:: with SMTP id q17mr12653962wrn.27.1547731519471;
Thu, 17 Jan 2019 05:25:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from OfficeWin7.lan (82-70-254-222.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk. [82.70.254.222])
by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g188sm45960008wmf.32.2019.01.17.05.25.18
(version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128);
Thu, 17 Jan 2019 05:25:18 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 13:25:17 +0000
From: Chris Wilson <dead.fets@gmail.com>
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Message-ID: <128131663.20190117132517@gmail.com>
To: N1BUG <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
In-Reply-To: <c634d312-92d3-faac-d48e-433e1ab12fda@n1bug.com>
References: <16856e12994.marcocadeddu@tin.it> <92fbbb62-a1fe-0e0f-c048-08dd3c2cdfb2@n1bug.com> <1973353494.20190117121430@gmail.com> <c634d312-92d3-faac-d48e-433e1ab12fda@n1bug.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net",
has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
@@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details.
Content preview: Hello N1BUG, Yes that would work just as well :) I tend to
overcomplicate things having a small machine shop here <LOL> Thursday, January
17, 2019, 12:34:08 PM, you wrote:
Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
-0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
no trust
[2a00:1450:4864:20:0:0:0:434 listed in]
[list.dnswl.org]
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail
provider (dead.fets[at]gmail.com)
0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid
X-Scan-Signature: 6ffbd2c9950b634d6cc91f9565b01a8b
Subject: Re: R: RE: LF: JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test ends with smoke :)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=PRIORITY_NO_NAME autolearn=no
version=2.63
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Hello N1BUG,
Yes that would work just as well :) I tend to overcomplicate things
having a small machine shop here <LOL>
Thursday, January 17, 2019, 12:34:08 PM, you wrote:
> Hi Chris,
> That is an interesting idea. I think it should be a press fit to so
> it doesn't tilt to the side and cause the coil winding to be a bit
> loose.
> I was thinking along another line. Use a machine screw through the
> coil form as before (make it brass this time), but instead of
> attaching the inside were lug under the screw head, bring the wire
> out through a hole near the machine screw, bend it over and put a
> lug on it outside. Then this lug and the one from the end of the
> coil itself can be pressed against each other between two nuts (or
> nut, lug, lug, lock washer, nut). The would assure better contact
> and should reduce the tendency for the most critical part of the
> assembly to loosen. If one were to be very paranoid, he could even
> solder a short safety jumper from lug to lug. ;-)
> 73,
> Paul
--
Best regards,
Chris mailto:dead.fets@gmail.com