Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id x0HDWKdl009726 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 14:32:32 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1gk7fk-00069t-Qv for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 13:25:28 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1gk7fe-00069k-Gs for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 13:25:22 +0000 Received: from mail-wr1-x434.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::434]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from ) id 1gk7fc-0006NQ-Kz for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 13:25:21 +0000 Received: by mail-wr1-x434.google.com with SMTP id t6so10944720wrr.12 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 05:25:20 -0800 (PST) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:reply-to:message-id:to:subject:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=2fCnalmXDwDHXCeTktYLjulRm0V63ZYL1PHIPhaU9vU=; b=cFuZ6NKDdUQVLU2oPwZHyOVGTdEURefiSMGl1bMoB2vrNU9GXIaLk627VjfWGspkGi oHI/xkkrdD5SilhOSzBtq2+58gcA+UPpDHtCxKHJuKZFTae6cpOf7EBW3oCKpH2QgoAZ 5qNWcbsZklrK/L25+RvxNzrqlTpAA/t8i2Li8Y8cXDLyI8X5VbzTHpXYA/wc03CIJdVG e6qL35PnwQe+sRcHPiy8dfbl3t7zEQqZ0850klbGdw6b/LJK30iSSR1TL8m+M4G/QOic e1FCSP+joh5haf+7IMhBjMHd0wVBKulPHsEITtwsCmNT0SRa5vSNCswkPXZbHpCUBFzo WzsA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:reply-to:message-id:to:subject :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=2fCnalmXDwDHXCeTktYLjulRm0V63ZYL1PHIPhaU9vU=; b=r7mrg2kkKpENkDOjGTG3L4xMVNV3sbHfQ6Aa7Cy5LMy36dTi6Q+mt2LvUPfDj3+w+z iV7PWusc4CjGRSlF/lgiZ8EURR1W43bDyrleZNtd42jBSgqBuRlMTUuJ0S60x6veVLVF qsNtSt7z4qsUIGetRD085swwb1/XxNPfsEc7nZVuKU5kPrjUR7znhdBa4hF6Y/4Vs6Iw uRABLWD9uuU1h1eNZkYrHlZIMHjkbWaXURsa5QqGLnHLfIKf/650b1qagdLSVRFnDv1d bv/GxaYmQUtUz24Jj67exZGKmMYL1+B3PekY7y8zMN99By0CA7JsAr5qLrdTo1bP4Qzc F0cA== X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukceAaxDAInlOHp4tGhxOoUykXS5OBuG7zHTxGIf0/B3OvQ8cSSo jiLa1ApwCUv2PMERhu7Ii7t45KHP X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN6REjgQfuUHjzd6dPncojlVlX6RFDc6COJEqXvrvutDIj8qT2LDMzFssncTJVr2XptYwxiVDA== X-Received: by 2002:adf:dfd1:: with SMTP id q17mr12653962wrn.27.1547731519471; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 05:25:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from OfficeWin7.lan (82-70-254-222.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk. [82.70.254.222]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g188sm45960008wmf.32.2019.01.17.05.25.18 (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 17 Jan 2019 05:25:18 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 13:25:17 +0000 From: Chris Wilson X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <128131663.20190117132517@gmail.com> To: N1BUG In-Reply-To: References: <16856e12994.marcocadeddu@tin.it> <92fbbb62-a1fe-0e0f-c048-08dd3c2cdfb2@n1bug.com> <1973353494.20190117121430@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Hello N1BUG, Yes that would work just as well :) I tend to overcomplicate things having a small machine shop here Thursday, January 17, 2019, 12:34:08 PM, you wrote: Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [2a00:1450:4864:20:0:0:0:434 listed in] [list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (dead.fets[at]gmail.com) 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 6ffbd2c9950b634d6cc91f9565b01a8b Subject: Re: R: RE: LF: JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test ends with smoke :) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=PRIORITY_NO_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hello N1BUG, Yes that would work just as well :) I tend to overcomplicate things having a small machine shop here Thursday, January 17, 2019, 12:34:08 PM, you wrote: > Hi Chris, > That is an interesting idea. I think it should be a press fit to so > it doesn't tilt to the side and cause the coil winding to be a bit > loose. > I was thinking along another line. Use a machine screw through the > coil form as before (make it brass this time), but instead of > attaching the inside were lug under the screw head, bring the wire > out through a hole near the machine screw, bend it over and put a > lug on it outside. Then this lug and the one from the end of the > coil itself can be pressed against each other between two nuts (or > nut, lug, lug, lock washer, nut). The would assure better contact > and should reduce the tendency for the most critical part of the > assembly to loosen. If one were to be very paranoid, he could even > solder a short safety jumper from lug to lug. ;-) > 73, > Paul -- Best regards, Chris mailto:dead.fets@gmail.com