Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id w030JSWs029479 for ; Wed, 3 Jan 2018 01:19:29 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1eWW61-0000IX-MM for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 02 Jan 2018 23:35:49 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1eWW5u-0000IO-Bt for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 02 Jan 2018 23:35:42 +0000 Received: from mail-wr0-x22a.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c0c::22a]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1eWW5q-0004cz-Fx for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 02 Jan 2018 23:35:40 +0000 Received: by mail-wr0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id w107so17231wrb.9 for ; Tue, 02 Jan 2018 15:35:38 -0800 (PST) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:message-id:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=hjpv63JMZC5+gUZ8HObYUMVP+HewfODZLk7uab/Mq64=; b=e4O1er2MqGEXTPICdoNW5bgCGQvxpHAknHcDIgyeTJsDerbzAnAv4Vb4tWQpsDX2XF qOMy0Ql5DXS7VHrBkDB18/aXJFqtlmILKzJjRtXF/us/iAvK1BEJvuKU/yPt09nrvnBV va+11ov7fi6pHuLae75tHfk3lxHhpAgeMK8JidBpk9SXrb6UeykLUPoOPkvp+0zN10VD G4ll7BAYdVTS9mflZK7RM/r7beCTiVhZzt6onMqCzYLp4CqaRTb5mMeXXCoNEqPKQUPz XADBbFZ3TsRBP1i2o8q92qXjCCWZhv419VtAmJ4MCuJo/+D8FYfYsZXnxBXFGYJJfPAl BPeg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:message-id:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=hjpv63JMZC5+gUZ8HObYUMVP+HewfODZLk7uab/Mq64=; b=pYbVyI93ZP4VEhwFw+rBfRfhQ6oM5FgeCrhSqmkA0NynOzLVMKW+/FwT2zNcC7WzpE wkiDsH6ioTRJ0vig/usC4K/nELOF9oHpWiNSx8KxTGh+gnbJwdLvLCW/UwTk79yd/rIQ 9qGtf1CjrNAUPEN7wtHlnY+UL0L/c5/+Zq/IHKOYLZ8q6t+od8i3drh6ZLXFyxboqIkN kkhrdj+CufX1LZPkR+JoPmSfiTDB5GKsdqxPenfppqfrEA6hbcm13t6S89pJBnjqVTYY z53qbCI9lb1sHHeAfN7W43r2LTZfb3AJ89t8FWA5FreZc2GRx37+JBspbFIgkyn8rOps zwyg== X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mKXdTy9MGPf72onvhBqeqlcNiD1hrlNJcAT2Qvr226+6pkgk8ZR Doq1lrkqQnDFc+NmwpeIT8GmBg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBotm7V6v+Sko0qMQOpIjMjdG3qVjSKVAhnGaG8dZrZG8MTGaVBkHZUL6Oo7R5yWqbyZ8XK4nyQ== X-Received: by 10.223.196.211 with SMTP id o19mr50544583wrf.240.1514936137003; Tue, 02 Jan 2018 15:35:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from OfficeWin7.lan (82-70-254-222.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk. [82.70.254.222]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r9sm11076614wrg.74.2018.01.02.15.35.35 (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 02 Jan 2018 15:35:36 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2018 23:35:34 +0000 From: Chris Wilson X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1229868611.20180102233534@gmail.com> To: Markus Vester CC: dead.fets@gmail.com In-Reply-To: <160b3a9c7d1-171c-1d653@webjas-vad221.srv.aolmail.net> References: <781825051.20180101212433@gmail.com> <160b3a9c7d1-171c-1d653@webjas-vad221.srv.aolmail.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello Markus / Andy / all, Please see http://www.gatesgarth.com/amp-simplified3.jpg I added 2 off 86k resistors as resistive dividers as shown. Voltages were as expected 1.87 and 1.86V on pins 2 and 4 but both driver output pins sat high at circa 12V . Removing the added resistors but running the MCP1404 on 9V all works fine with gate and drain waveforms as shown here: [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (dead.fets[at]gmail.com) 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 3d0ae5b4ae8b74dc4bf5c1dbe3fef430 Subject: Re: LF: Si5351A syntehsiser able to fire a FET driver chip directly?? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=PRIORITY_NO_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by klubnl.pl id w030JSWs029479 Hello Markus / Andy / all, Please see http://www.gatesgarth.com/amp-simplified3.jpg I added 2 off 86k resistors as resistive dividers as shown. Voltages were as expected 1.87 and 1.86V on pins 2 and 4 but both driver output pins sat high at circa 12V . Removing the added resistors but running the MCP1404 on 9V all works fine with gate and drain waveforms as shown here: http://www.gatesgarth.com/resistive.jpg Not sure why this is so....Have I misunderstood the bias at 1.8V Andy suggested?? By e-mail: @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ "When I said bias half way, meant half way between the two logic threshold limits. Ie mid way between 1.3V (upper limit of guaranteed '0' and 2.4V (lower limit of guaranteed '1') so bias at 1.8V Not half the supply volts. Study the data sheets and calculate. Don't just play with components willy-nilly. Andy G4JNT" @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ Thanks. Monday, January 1, 2018, 9:38:56 PM, you wrote: >> Any ideas please? > As Andy said, bias half way: place another pair of 15k from the inputs (Pins 12,10) to 5V (pin9). > 73, Markus > -----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung----- > Von: Chris Wilson > An: rsgb_lf_group > Verschickt: Mo, 1. Jan 2018 22:26 > Betreff: Re: LF: Si5351A syntehsiser able to fire a FET driver chip directly?? > Hello Andy, > MCP1404 IC fitted, as soon as power to the PA FETS is applied (even > 6V) one of the gate square waves either disappears or becomes > extremely random. Swapping inputs to the driver IC makes no > difference, it's one pair of PA FET's dependent. FET's work fine when > returned to "as designed" status! Driving the driver IC through the > 1nF caps and 15k resistors to ground. Outputs from CLK0 and CLK1 are > 180 out of phase and seem correct. Any ideas please? Thank you! > http://www.gatesgarth.com/amp-modded.jpg > Monday, January 1, 2018, 11:27:20 AM, you wrote: >> Seems an odd choice of driver chip. A high/low side driver used in >> a non-bootstrapped mode to drive two low-side FETs >> How about one of the normal FET driver chips - picking out one I've >> used in the past, the MCP14E 3/4/5 family. Logic level input, >> spec. Logic '0' max 1.3V, Logic '1' min 2.4V. So bias half way and >> your 2.2V swing takes it into the valid range. >> They three types are inverting, non inverting, and one of each in a package >> Andy G4JNT -- Best regards, Chris mailto:dead.fets@gmail.com