Return-Path: <owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Received: from rly-mg08.mx.aol.com (rly-mg08.mail.aol.com [172.20.83.114]) by air-mg01.mail.aol.com (v121_r4.4) with ESMTP id MAILINMG011-a2d49257e411a0; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 10:12:08 -0500
Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-mg08.mx.aol.com (v121_r4.4) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINMG087-a2d49257e411a0; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 10:12:04 -0500
Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14)
	id 1L3BBY-0004xj-JS
	for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 15:11:12 +0000
Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net)
	by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14)
	id 1L3BBY-0004xa-6q
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 15:11:12 +0000
Received: from mbox2.netikka.net ([213.250.81.203])
	by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
	(envelope-from <phl@netikka.fi>)
	id 1L3BBV-0006SG-R0
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 15:11:12 +0000
Received: from mbox2-vams.netikka.net (mbox2 [127.0.0.1])
	by mbox2-scanned.netikka.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 36F79408165
	for <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 17:11:01 +0200 (EET)
Received: from imp1.netikka.net (imp1.netikka.net [213.250.85.154])
	by mbox2.netikka.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31BC7408165
	for <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 17:10:59 +0200 (EET)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by imp1.netikka.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D8AB495B92
	for <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 17:10:59 +0200 (EET)
Received: from eur-info24.infonet.com (eur-info24.infonet.com [213.31.11.24]) 
	by imp.netikka.net (IMP) with HTTP 
	for <lindpa02@localhost>; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 17:10:59 +0200
Message-ID: <1227193859.49257e0306cc6@imp.netikka.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 17:10:59 +0200
From: Paul-Henrik <phl@netikka.fi>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <001e01c94a77$cc1fa780$a402a8c0@Inspiron> <004e01c94a9c$dddbe860$0900a8c0@AM> <1227166876.4925149c95ec8@imp.netikka.net> <49251A7B.6050603@telia.com>
In-Reply-To: <49251A7B.6050603@telia.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.6
X-Originating-IP: 213.31.11.24
X-Karma: 0: 
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none
Subject: Re: LF: Re: 3C85/90 Toroids
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false
X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20
X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version)


I forgot to mention one important thing in my last reply:

>From the earlier discussions on this subject I got the impression that T130-=
3
and T200-2 cores were suggested as alternatives to the 3C85/3C90.

The mixes #2 and #3 are powder iron, not ferrite as the 3F3 and 3C85/3C90. I
beleive they are poorly suited as power transformers on LF/MF but make good
inductors for low-pass filters on 136 and 500kHz. This is true at least for=20=
the
#2 mix. On 500kHz I remember seeing reports of severe LPF heating with the #=
3
mix, I will have to check again on that.

Some of the gurus please correct me if I'm wrong here. I just wanted to pres=
s
the "pause and think again" button before someone possibly orders inductor
cores to use for a transformer.

I'm still a beginner/learner in this game, the above is just how I see thing=
s
today.

73's

Paul-Henrik


Quoting "Johan H. Bodin" <jh.bodin@telia.com>:

> Yes, 3F3 is even better than 3C85/3C90 for power transformation at a few
> hundred
> kHz. The 3F3 cores, if coloured, are light blue. Philips sold their ferrit=
e
> business to Ferroxcube: http://www.ferroxcube.com/
>
> 73
> Johan SM6LKM
>
>
> Paul-Henrik wrote:
> > Have a look at Ferroxcube (Philips) cores of 3F3 material. As far as I c=
an
> > interpret datasheets for these, they should work fairly well as
> transformers up
> > to 500kHz with a DC component and up to 1MHz without DC.
>
>