Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.96.198 with SMTP id du6csp42786igb; Sat, 30 Nov 2013 15:42:01 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.181.11.197 with SMTP id ek5mr12030449wid.7.1385854921126; Sat, 30 Nov 2013 15:42:01 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id fo2si16423019wic.4.2013.11.30.15.42.00 for ; Sat, 30 Nov 2013 15:42:01 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@comcast.net Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1VmtZc-000729-6s for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 30 Nov 2013 23:03:40 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1VmtZb-000720-Di for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 30 Nov 2013 23:03:39 +0000 Received: from qmta15.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.59.228]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1VmtZY-0001z0-7W for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 30 Nov 2013 23:03:38 +0000 Received: from omta13.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.52]) by qmta15.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id vywT1m00117dt5G5Fz3a4m; Sat, 30 Nov 2013 23:03:34 +0000 Received: from Owner ([166.170.41.74]) by omta13.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id vz3N1m00B1c0PWm3Zz3T3C; Sat, 30 Nov 2013 23:03:32 +0000 From: "hvanesce" To: References: In-Reply-To: Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2013 16:03:17 -0700 Message-ID: <120801ceee20$60a05ed0$21e11c70$@comcast.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQGyfJYAEN81yseiRjOJGdJuC3+X7Jp3RlCA Content-Language: en-us DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20121106; t=1385852614; bh=t6UxJ2UcXb5oYLHoOH5iXrhAfd+Xn4zGKzJs6WXx80s=; h=Received:Received:From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version: Content-Type; b=PHFv3sdAeOmDzxuenWNhYJUPB12Vxz3KHeRtifEheHO9HLZO8pB9MzvyBko8SGX/g M8MJmpERxXKEQglQZ1g+bC8e6gXvljiL96jDD6T4J4tFMeMI71Gbs0yyDetu34Gwp3 ygUXvN8d0lhImjU7QCBeFN/4UrGMyYPqchhl9sRGP3itYEAh9z4UVYW4lHizvy3Nei 8RN8hii9uUw0iOwXLMb3cKNzBagDGzWUlAn4hKhR0E8x9CABXm5iIyw385vG6mw+fC HKLnK13MLNjoZdcBRvSalKiKmbCi3LdccsbWcZqwJCPELGSAauh1pxsAyKxH/Jij/f LSwHMrjYS2UmA== X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello Uwe, My VLF RX startup was delayed but now running in SpecLab; will be monitoring 8970.022 continuously for at least the next week. 73, [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [76.96.59.228 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (hvanesce[at]comcast.net) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: b28d3e72b5adfaf9991664afe0a993a6 Subject: RE: Re: LF: A 8970Hz Report from The Netherlands. Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_1209_01CEEDE5.B4424A20" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=HTML_60_70,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 1763 This is a multipart message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_1209_01CEEDE5.B4424A20 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello Uwe, My VLF RX startup was delayed but now running in SpecLab; will be monitoring 8970.022 continuously for at least the next week. 73, Jim AA5BW From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of uwe-jannsen@kabelmail.de Sent: Saturday, November 30, 2013 3:41 PM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: Re: LF: A 8970Hz Report from The Netherlands. Hi Stefan and Eddie, the QRG is 8970.022Hz, still. Stefan, I used SecLab for qrg generation months ago. would be OK today too. but I dont like the PC beeing switched on for hours. GL Uwe/dj8wx jo43sv. _____ Von: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Gesendet: 30.11.2013 22:21 An: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Betreff: Re: LF: A 8970Hz Report from The Netherlands. _____ Hello Uwe, No chance to convince you to try to use SpecLab for the frequency generation? 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 30.11.2013 18:00, schrieb uwe-jannsen@kabelmail.de: Hi Henny and Peter, tks for the roports. at 1637utc I switched the TX on. due to a local heros "football play" I was somewhat late. the qrg generator isn't 100% OK. the counter shows some uHz qrh.it is a homebrew ZL1BPU exciter. changing the AVRmicro and connecting an other 10MHz qrg normal didn't solve the problem. we will see. the TX will be switched on for some hours. GL Uwe/dj8wx jo43sv ------=_NextPart_000_1209_01CEEDE5.B4424A20 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello Uwe,

 

My VLF RX startup was delayed but now running in SpecLab; will be = monitoring 8970.022 continuously for at least the next = week.

 

73,

 

Jim AA5BW

 

From:= = owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org = [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of = uwe-jannsen@kabelmail.de
Sent: Saturday, November 30, 2013 = 3:41 PM
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: = Re: Re: LF: A 8970Hz Report from The = Netherlands.

 

Hi Stefan = and Eddie,

the QRG is 8970.022Hz, still.
Stefan, I used SecLab = for qrg generation months ago. would be OK today too.
but I dont like = the PC beeing switched on for hours.

GL
Uwe/dj8wx = jo43sv.

Von: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=
Gesendet: 30.11.2013 22:21
An: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=
Betreff: Re: LF: A 8970Hz Report from The = Netherlands.


Hello = Uwe,

No chance to convince you to try to use SpecLab for the = frequency generation?

73, Stefan/DK7FC

Am 30.11.2013 = 18:00, schrieb uwe-jannsen@kabelmail.de: =

Hi Henny and = Peter,
tks for the roports.

at 1637utc I = switched the TX on. due to a local heros “football play” I = was somewhat late.

the qrg = generator isn’t 100% OK. the counter shows some uHz qrh.it is a = homebrew ZL1BPU exciter. changing the AVRmicro and connecting an other = 10MHz qrg normal didn’t solve the = problem.

we will = see.

the TX will = be switched on for some hours.

GL =

Uwe/dj8wx = jo43sv

 

------=_NextPart_000_1209_01CEEDE5.B4424A20--