Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2016 14:55:15 +0000 (UTC)
From: M0FMT <m0fmt@yahoo.co.uk>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Message-ID: <1204890029.980682.1479653715392@mail.yahoo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1204890029.980682.1479653715392.ref@mail.yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: LF: bounce test
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Status: O


--------------------------------------------
On Sun, 20/11/16, M0FMT <m0fmt@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:

 Subject: Re: LF: bounce test
 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
 Date: Sunday, 20 November, 2016, 12:40
 
 Tnx fer info but bounce backs are the
 norm now with black-sheep.... :-(
 
 73 es GL Pete M0FMT GQRP#15097.in IO91UX 
 
 On Sun, 20/11/16, Alan Melia <alan.melia@btinternet.com>
 wrote:
 
  Subject: LF: bounce test
  To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
  Date: Sunday, 20 November, 2016, 12:28
  
  Just to get an example of the
  bounce.io response.
  
  Please note these responses do not suggest your message
 has
  not been 
  accepted, they show that one members address, now
 obselete,
  cannot be 
  delivered to. They are only sent to the originator but are
 a
  pain. The owner 
  of bounce.io has been advised he does not have authority
 to
  intercept these 
  emails and has been requested to desist.....with no reply
 of
  course.
  
  Alan
  G3NYK