Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25196 invoked from network); 1 Nov 2003 04:21:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO marstons.services.quay.plus.net) (212.159.14.223) by mailstore with SMTP; 1 Nov 2003 04:21:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 17515 invoked by uid 10001); 1 Nov 2003 04:21:53 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Filtered-by: Plusnet (hmail v1.01) X-Spam-detection-level: 11 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.20) by marstons.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 1 Nov 2003 04:21:31 -0000 X-Fake-Domain: majordom Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1AFnCF-0000GR-SQ for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Sat, 01 Nov 2003 04:17:07 +0000 Received: from [64.12.136.6] (helo=imo-m03.mx.aol.com) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1AFnCE-0000DK-Vs for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 01 Nov 2003 04:17:07 +0000 X-Fake-Domain: WarmSpgs@aol.com Received: from WarmSpgs@aol.com by imo-m03.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v36_r1.1.) id l.120.269c4e62 (16781) for ; Fri, 31 Oct 2003 23:16:33 -0500 (EST) From: WarmSpgs@aol.com Message-ID: <120.269c4e62.2cd48da1@aol.com> Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 23:16:33 EST To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: AOL 4.0 for Windows 95 sub 120 Subject: Re: LF: RE: Solar Activity Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.60 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Spam-Rating: 1 In a message dated 10/31/03 12:47:15 PM Eastern Standard Time, J.R.Moritz@herts.ac.uk writes: > But > somewhat surprisingly, I had quite good M-to-O copy from VO1NA between > about 0600 and some time after 0800 this morning. Excellent news. I am possibly a little more optimistic than Alan about a timely decay of ionisation levels, if we can just have fewer X-rays and protons for a while. John