Return-Path: Received: (qmail 40073 invoked from network); 4 Dec 2003 18:53:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO murphys.services.quay.plus.net) (212.159.14.225) by ptb-mailstore with SMTP; 4 Dec 2003 18:53:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 19589 invoked from network); 4 Dec 2003 18:52:53 -0000 X-Filtered-by: Plusnet (hmail v1.01) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Spam-detection-level: 11 Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.20) by murphys.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 4 Dec 2003 18:52:47 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-Fake-Domain: majordom Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1ARyWb-00069Q-F0 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Thu, 04 Dec 2003 18:48:29 +0000 Received: from [217.72.192.158] (helo=smtp.web.de) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1ARyWa-00069C-SN for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 04 Dec 2003 18:48:28 +0000 Received: from [217.228.164.171] (helo=pD9E4A4AB.dip.t-dialin.net) by smtp.web.de with esmtp (WEB.DE 4.99 #566) id 1ARyW6-0006jT-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 04 Dec 2003 19:47:58 +0100 Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2003 19:48:03 +0100 From: "Michael Oexner" X-Suspect-Bulk-Mailer: The Bat! X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.62r) Personal X-Priority: 3 Message-ID: <1173800508.20031204194803@web.de> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org In-reply-to: <17d.24167aca.2d00d3a1@aol.com> References: <17d.24167aca.2d00d3a1@aol.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: LF: Spam etc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.60 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Spam-Rating: 1 Hi all, >> Try something like mailwasher. > All good and well, but as I said yesterday (a) it's not 100% > effective, and (b) one utterly miniscule change to the list rules > would virtually eliminate any spam coming through the reflector and > thereby reduce the total volume of junkmail. > John Is the list moderator following this discussion? Who's in charge of this mailing list (sorry for not knowing this)? Why not send him a mail directly and ask him to change the necessary Majordomo (?) settings?? -- Best regards, Michael mailto:michael.oexner@web.de