Message-ID: <1102351083.41b48aec066a8@webmail.ukonline.net>
Date: Mon,  6 Dec 2004 16:38:04 +0000
From: captbrian <captbrian@ukonline.co.uk>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <6d7bf820.a65c1879.820dd00@mail05.onetel.net.uk> <000d01c4d55b$7bf4d680$045bfea9@d4f8d8> <001601c4d614$a28a9e60$61e4fc3e@l8p8y6>
In-Reply-To: <001601c4d614$a28a9e60$61e4fc3e@l8p8y6>
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2
Subject: Re: LF: Linear modes
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org

Most RTTY programs have a computere generated CW facility also.
 Morse-challenged operators  could possibly use such ?

Bryan G3GVB

Quoting hamilton mal <g3kev.ham@virgin.net>:

> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Andy Talbot" <actalbot@southsurf.com>
> To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
> Sent: Sunday, November 28, 2004 3:03 PM
> Subject: Re: LF: Linear modes
> 
> 
> > An LF 'RTTY type waveform' already exists -  Jason !   'Normal' RTTY, even
> > at the narrowest shift / baud rate for any of the standard software, would
> > be far to wide to be sociable on LF.
> 
> Normal RTTY would not be acceptable on LF this has been discussed many times
> before.
> Everyone seems to be avoiding the obvious choice ie NORMAL CW.
> The 500 khz band if it becomes available to radio amateurs has traditionally
> been a CW band.
> I would suggest that those interested in LF should learn CW. This mode is
> more likely to attract new users on LF.
> Data modes are useful if there is a large volume of traffic to move between
> stations. The average radio amateur only exchanges Name, QTH, and QSA/QRK
> and CW is ideal for this purpose and no complicated modems are required.
> 73 de Mal/G3KEV
> 
> 
> 
> >
> > Andy  G4JNT
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Brian G3YKB" <g3ykb@onetel.com>
> > To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
> > Sent: Sunday, November 28, 2004 2:34 PM
> > Subject: Re: LF: Linear modes
> >
> >
> > >
> > > G3XDV writes:
> > >
> > > >My question about linear amplifiers sparked some useful
> > > >dialogue about eliminating the need for linears.
> > >
> > > >If a new data mode is to be developed, it seems to me that
> > > >two modes are needed. One for 'local' working in a CW
> > > >bandwidth for those who do not wish to learn CW. The
> > > >other in a much narrower bandwidth - the limiting factor
> > > >being Loran lines - for intercontinental working.
> > >
> > > As so few stations have linear power amplifiers, I wonder if
> > > "keyboard activity" (particularly for "local ragchews") could
> > > be encouraged by using an "old" mode such as fsk(rtty?) ?
> > > Many of us have the necessary software (some may still have
> > > the hardware!!).
> > >
> > > Brian G3YKB
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> > > Version: 7.0.289 / Virus Database: 265.4.3 - Release Date: 2004-11-26
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > No virus found in this outgoing message.
> > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> > Version: 7.0.289 / Virus Database: 265.4.3 - Release Date: 2004-11-26
> >
> >
> 
> 
> 


-- 


----------------------------------------------
This mail sent through http://www.ukonline.net