Return-Path: X-Spam-DCC: paranoid 1170; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL, SPF_PASS,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=no version=3.1.3 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by paranoid.lipkowski.org (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id u6EINk1m020510 for ; Thu, 14 Jul 2016 20:23:47 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1bNl9M-0004ci-Uu for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 14 Jul 2016 19:14:16 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1bNl9I-0004cZ-Ht for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 14 Jul 2016 19:14:12 +0100 Received: from nm10-vm4.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com ([212.82.96.156]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1bNl9F-00079v-Ft for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 14 Jul 2016 19:14:11 +0100 X-DKIM-Result: Domain=yahoo.co.uk Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.co.uk; s=s2048; t=1468520048; bh=yYGv50nSC1xi8XOLWMALVnJeBhMIBlzf8i1EmQWhP+4=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Subject:References:From:Subject; b=cJlv3Qil4uFogOJG3EnEP8QlR6mNI25dxP66hyrwMFjWtiqF66vlcq5c1NQGT0hkIgDicmH6po99LgHoai21lFOdMS4RZ96CgwHVc7O20+bioxA1db65huvPGJm1NrisfTfy6ffzRV/mcWMWzeZ9RJWOY55b72tjes9ZYEYNdYiPSn4eYZBgzCPrCgqzFIxXBKxfDAOv1ARTftb67/XLHs359S6+ou8E/sGu5ldjBAH9a1ATNyN3IEWm+hdHwN6DfT7w+uJeQrzj2BNnN+m3pUNYnqxBqppVrzy7dgde0Qr45uTqKOTfdyf8RAlkwoqPLklazrauC8Qc1Vpz9ilOfw== Received: from [212.82.98.51] by nm10.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 14 Jul 2016 18:14:08 -0000 Received: from [212.82.98.81] by tm4.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 14 Jul 2016 18:14:08 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1018.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 14 Jul 2016 18:14:08 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 166545.4349.bm@omp1018.mail.ir2.yahoo.com X-YMail-OSG: 01KgdK8VM1mYWOeqKxx34_x.c_orfP4BVdq199pouKazd9.uin4_NRmoDzF_id6 8zFjgYbDBanQn05zlQpj8zuQ6QEi2RTvajMVv7WZJT5G._zrrhh0putqnEmLCX4Vqy_akvYX.ZO2 GX5SCn6OhX7DFkUzOG1LbZ0YtDSHYztKiCIUnzmq4UDk.L.A5QcVfVTSRd1pEJzs1_o75vupcR2W dsYyOzrOYObfEJua5V7PazpyFrqMu.VAMdyV2BRn6tSY82khh_6alXS8sV2eZ9Ycmd3Q7hQy2AC0 tIynhhfKME1ubjHJZydc0tplJDot25jZ75CikfFdP1DKuCSmuhr1oL1nxgXch4vYpOOUiMCstrjo QLBOGLfjFcWf0a2ipWtxjc2rYeDeHkD_DIsFECLieEfsZiv97kmyDEx94P3C9f3xzC_agWJdwFxu y07dDWgQBWU6bVH0vEXNjCQ_7WoSIoRIEtZfMargGKTNtL4UMKcQsGEIPr5zPY50FnF6H8rIyupi uLRv.6eKd8qGSoTHoXExQVmsbBpw- Received: from jws11196.mail.ir2.yahoo.com by sendmailws108.mail.ir2.yahoo.com; Thu, 14 Jul 2016 18:14:07 +0000; 1468520047.715 Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2016 18:14:07 +0000 (UTC) From: M0FMT To: Message-ID: <1034334070.5070379.1468520047061.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1034334070.5070379.1468520047061.JavaMail.yahoo.ref@mail.yahoo.com> X-Scan-Signature: 4a8faa6952847c1ec651f883b63fc053 Subject: Re: LF: SAQ statistics Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 10.1.3.11 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by paranoid.lipkowski.org id u6EINk1m020510 Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 8378 Hi You can say that Richard but I couldn't possibly comment. 73 es GL Pete M0FMT GQRP#15097.in IO91UX . -------------------------------------------- On Thu, 14/7/16, Richard S wrote: Subject: Re: LF: SAQ statistics To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Thursday, 14 July, 2016, 11:02 Oh dear, the Brits feel left out of SAQ! 14 lip 2016 09:45 "M0FMT" napisał(a): Hi all I am still not getting my own mails back from Blacksheep almost as perplexing as why the DL listenership of SAQ is so much higher than elsewhere. Population of Radio Amateurs and the proximity of DL land to SM no doubt  contributes, but the difference is so large. It has been consistently large over many years. It could be that the listenership in G land is higher but don't report in.... a bit unlikely. Many thanks for the suggestions. Oh apologies for highlighting such a boring topic. 73 es GL Pete M0FMT GQRP#15097.in IO91UX -------------------------------------------- On Wed, 13/7/16, Andy Talbot wrote:  Subject: Re: LF: SAQ statistics  To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org  Date: Wednesday, 13 July, 2016, 19:47  And  because it's chirpy CW and we've all moved on from  that by now.Been there, done that  Andy  G4JNT  On 13 July 2016 at 19:30,  Chris  wrote:  Probably  because it's so easy and we've done it many times  before?  G4AYT.  ----- Original Message ----- From: "Peter"  To:  Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2016 6:54 PM  Subject: Re: LF: SAQ statistics  Hi,  On 13.07.2016 12:02, M0FMT wrote:  ...  Why is there such a high number of DLs receiving SAQ at 116  ?  Why is there such a low number of *reports* from UK  receiving SAQ ?  Peter  PS: http://lf-radio.de/misc/SAQ/SAQ_1998.wav