Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id wAQC4UEL002986 for ; Mon, 26 Nov 2018 13:04:46 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1gRFXk-0000Ab-Gm for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 26 Nov 2018 11:59:12 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1gRFXj-0000AS-Rh for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 26 Nov 2018 11:59:11 +0000 Received: from mail-wm1-x336.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::336]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91_59-0488984) (envelope-from ) id 1gRFXi-0001nn-4v for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 26 Nov 2018 11:59:10 +0000 Received: by mail-wm1-x336.google.com with SMTP id q26so18050651wmf.5 for ; Mon, 26 Nov 2018 03:59:10 -0800 (PST) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:reply-to:message-id:to:subject:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=cyIWpR0Em4vHBKNY1XjaQN5WatiOw1YagaaU2kJJWJI=; b=KcXSI5NDAmbmLZD190l/Uvj2UScMI6JBwRVusRFAXTmHlzT3tNsDJht0S2WFSLLk/i LEz1qMw/ym/Ww7hQ9bxvzQMMtuG0NCQd4ZJ7gHc12MbU7etCXubf+xd9wXUMnPN3qFz8 QHj3qaxNtWYsQUXrl/GEurM91cVdOFOo0emvNf6Nxzf8fmJsIIaPgIZv7lmb0K4lW9MT 7XOL5qChHfYq6v7U0ODUKP8j/EcypYNk9ItCqvC0BUUL4vKpfsGLZXK/iQdLwdKELlfW 4VpaeNsIa6ar9Z9/ThmhTwxRi25yzB4Pylf2W7ZBYCHoUMs55JjIVjZN5EWDtkenh1TO pK7Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:reply-to:message-id:to:subject :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=cyIWpR0Em4vHBKNY1XjaQN5WatiOw1YagaaU2kJJWJI=; b=P2VkLblxXC/HDSW+umG2UQx9tO0/YlfZvq/7T4bQz2c4yshsaZixQo9IYkLe3qastG lKXndPWqdhs8vtR7m//XQe7V6SAnpxx4PgJ+2VH9wc6/wPFsLc1HUSnQ7zc39rnUkuPi L/xXMSBg3HiusZt1K7kD8hg4lCstxVrk9X5vDPFl+cQYaVvtsl2gGZ8iXx92xbjZpZmf FhpLQ8OVkOKKf99Fw/gSrUVJ93DxaEszCt8sidcgUW2zMdGVJ65iXQx/Ix2G7FOUrzrj t/Szhaz3zr0qmM6JA+hYc+ovC4KVpyOMKKwNCv8/hVZ6DRJdjQBymVK5eUbxIyj8nfHU khbA== X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gL/WJqLgmnP948VtDAfj7OiawGppDn6MZaEUoAF7aYJJJd30/TT /r6MFAgNTxyUs1IpKxCmf6F8q3xn X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5fyaJmRe2TZZHFvjRFbSz4z0pQhYYlrzYcY4caua95uDV4+g/m7is5tWHYb7qWo3BdOBeOv7Q== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:3a8d:: with SMTP id h135-v6mr23305291wma.92.1543233548995; Mon, 26 Nov 2018 03:59:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from OfficeWin7.lan (82-70-254-222.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk. [82.70.254.222]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d4sm44874wrp.89.2018.11.26.03.59.07 (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 26 Nov 2018 03:59:08 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 11:59:06 +0000 From: Chris Wilson X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1026827205.20181126115906@gmail.com> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 1.6 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Hello Mal, It was me,2E0ILY. Thanks for the info. The Wellbrook loop is a large aperture wire loop, but as G0LUJ is a coastal location I think maybe that flatters the signals. I guess I should try a long resonat [...] Content analysis details: (1.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [2a00:1450:4864:20:0:0:0:336 listed in] [list.dnswl.org] 1.6 SUBJ_ALL_CAPS Subject is all capitals -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (dead.fets[at]gmail.com) 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 5c335215f1b3de26d890ee84d49616ce Subject: Re: LF: ANTENNAS Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=PRIORITY_NO_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hello Mal, It was me,2E0ILY. Thanks for the info. The Wellbrook loop is a large aperture wire loop, but as G0LUJ is a coastal location I think maybe that flatters the signals. I guess I should try a long resonated wire first then! Thursday, November 22, 2018, 4:39:13 PM, you wrote: > > > > > Someone recently mentioned the Wellbrook loop. > > I borrowed a Wellbrook loop for antenna comparisons a while back. > Weak signals on MF that i could copy with my 1/4 wave inv L on MF > and also my 160m inv L also used to RX on MF. I could not even hear these weak signals on the Loop. > I could copy stronger signals on the Loop but these were 2 to 3 S > units down on the above wire antennas. > A vertical loop is not ideal for all round listening except it is > rotatable, but could be useful to null out noise at a noisy QTH > A resonated length of wire as long as possible would be a better choice for all round listening > de G3KEV > -- Best regards, Chris mailto:dead.fets@gmail.com