DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=s1024; d=btinternet.com;
  h=DKIM-Signature:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:From:To:References:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Mailer:X-MIMEOLE:In-Reply-To:Thread-Index;
  b=qg6972c7V/SdhjmywH8/c8XfVHXLEpRGlTPy1dM1dZFFOj/gbNORTG0Tt9BrkgLWSZrLE9Sh+RvrHkdR+j4orlCVsszTaPLXUS1uNg0Sl3iDakAfmrR3WIUBFSpeR45G7vwgVwF/MX+Bf+IwArVsLgNW5oNqWvZROuD4k54zrcI=  ;
From: "Ken" <ken.h.wright@btinternet.com>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
References: <h0drfa73usb6ft8xspd0sl8j.1347476481893@email.android.com> <5050EA23.1040802@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <EF76E5CF7FCB43F38C1CF49114119176@lindavideo> <62B8952382DF4DB294DF41CA351C4188@Notebook> <5051C2B6.8080303@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <067BD06E05C54207A184D8CB4BFEB066@lindavideo> <50522DF1.9050502@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 20:47:28 +0100
Message-ID: <0FEA5D7549D94AA398184E6DEACDA6EE@lindavideo>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <50522DF1.9050502@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
Thread-Index: Ac2R4xBCLaXjDW1PRlSTylgnbgSGQwABVhgA
Subject: RE: LF: Re: RE: MF tonite
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org


Hi Stefan.
Fully understand.

73.
Ken.
M0KHW

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
[mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Stefan =
Sch=E4fer
Sent: 13 September 2012 20:03
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: Re: LF: Re: RE: MF tonite

Hi Ken,

OK but later. I want to try some modifications, i.e. using the 500 Ohm=20
input and the 18 kOhm output, to have some gain. If this does not affect =

the matching, i would prefer that...

73, Stefan
Am 13.09.2012 20:43, schrieb Ken:
> Stefan.
> Thank you for the info, maybe sometime you will be able to post the
circuit?
>
> 73.
>
> Ken
>
> M0KHW
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
> [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Stefan =
Sch=E4fer
> Sent: 13 September 2012 12:26
> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
> Subject: Re: LF: Re: RE: MF tonite
>
> Ah yes, Thomas was faster, damn ;-)
>
> Another image from the experimental setup, using source followers
>
https://dl.dropbox.com/u/19882028/MF/Mechanical_filter_with_source-follow=
ers
> .JPG
> The results have been very good last night!
>
> 73, Stefan/DK7FC
>
>
> Am 13.09.2012 13:12, schrieb Thomas Rosenkranz:
>   =20
>> Hy Ken,
>>
>> the name of the mechanical filter is FZ02
>> http://www.oppermann-electronic.de/html/hf-spezialbauteile.html
>>
>> http://dm4tr.bplaced.net/index.php?section=3DReceiver
>>
>> 73
>> Thomas DM4TR
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ken"<ken.h.wright@btinternet.com>
>> To:<rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
>> Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2012 10:28 AM
>> Subject: LF: RE: MF tonite
>>
>>
>> Hi Stefan.
>> What mechanical filter are you using?.
>> 73.
>> Ken
>> M0KHW
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
>> [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Stefan =
Sch=E4fer
>> Sent: 12 September 2012 21:02
>> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
>> Subject: LF: MF tonite
>>
>> Christian,
>>
>> Are you QRV tonite? I would like to see or better hear the difference =
of
>> my RX performance when using my band filter i was testing in the
>> afternoon.
>>
>> It is the mechanical filter which uses source followers at the input =
and
>> output, to provide a constant accurate impedance matching to keep the
>> passband ripple as low as possible. The afternoons tests have been =
very
>> promising, see https://dl.dropbox.com/u/19882028/MF/MF%20Filter.png
>> This is the frequency response:
>>
https://dl.dropbox.com/u/19882028/MF/473%20kHz%20ZF%20Filter%2040%20dB.pn=
g
>>     =20
>   =20
>>
>> There should be a much better image rejection now and so maybe a few
>> more dB SNR... Unfortunately the filter does not cover the 502 kHz
>> region. But this problem will be gone in some months...
>>
>> Will be on 472.5 kHz soon.
>>
>> 73, Stefan/DK7FC
>