Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dc03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 119663800008A; Thu, 6 Jun 2013 13:14:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1UkdkY-0002Nr-8s for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 06 Jun 2013 18:13:22 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1UkdkX-0002Ni-QE for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 06 Jun 2013 18:13:21 +0100 Received: from smtpout2.wanadoo.co.uk ([80.12.242.42] helo=smtpout.wanadoo.co.uk) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1UkdkV-0005Zk-Ke for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 06 Jun 2013 18:13:20 +0100 Received: from AGB ([95.145.210.189]) by mwinf5d21 with ME id l5DG1l00445jx6f035DG5L; Thu, 06 Jun 2013 19:13:19 +0200 Message-ID: <0F9E760BA8A740059FFCE5431EE11E6B@AGB> From: "Graham" To: References: <51AA488C.4020800@eastlink.ca> <9F4D930ED1F64F7C974C9F3570FE5DEA@White> <106509721.20130603101147@mterrier.net> <511259661.20130605104210@mterrier.net> <22F50727DAB943178CABF2FE9A731025@GaryAsus> <89A40DBD5FD24F7DAF1DC48FF71ABC37@White> <006801ce6251$bbd6c290$6401a8c0@JAYDELL> <89839D0C2679435898627697705F04C3@F6CNIAndyHP> In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2013 18:13:15 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Joe , Well its mid summer again ! Best I advice I can give is head for the middle of the two bands , op32 137.55 or op08 137.65 , this allows for any off sets in the the Rx side etc, 5 or 10 Hz off the band edges should give full performance, Op is about 2 Hz b/w so there is very little chance of 'doubling' in the classic , way . [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.12.242.42 listed in list.dnswl.org] X-Scan-Signature: 1bc6486c2865e7dc2ff7578e6d7fc226 Subject: Re: LF: VO1NA - 137.7770 kHz Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d408351b0c3825463 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hi Joe , Well its mid summer again ! Best I advice I can give is head for the middle of the two bands , op32 137.55 or op08 137.65 , this allows for any off sets in the the Rx side etc, 5 or 10 Hz off the band edges should give full performance, Op is about 2 Hz b/w so there is very little chance of 'doubling' in the classic , way . One thing to check is resident carriers in the pass band , I think Marcus has indicated there are some loran lines in band , further over may be some of the Russian stations can indicate if there is a problem, once again , more than a few Hz will not cause problems There is good chain of Op32 monitors from the uk west coast out to the east , so you should see good results, also inside the USA and across to west coast , not to mention Laurence up in Alaska , at least with the 50% duty cycle it will keep the heat down ! if your TX p/c is not web linked . there will be no tx beacon or decode spots , but its possible , to run the windows app on a web linked pc set band and set the tx timer - beacon on , sync with the tx driver , that way you can send the tx beacon ( will indicate op8 or op32) and collect the decode spots via the web directly , as there is no time locking , the tx beacon is just for indication Where as Op is designed to use standard tx/rx and soundcards with afc routines , Marcus is running a correlation process , looking for the pattern match , this in effect is decoding a single data 'bit' and stability will affect his decode system , but with another 10 dB s/n it may extend the range considerably ! Good luck and 73 Graham G0NBD OP32 137.5 137.6 OP08 137.6 137.7 -------------------------------------------------- From: Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2013 5:26 PM To: Subject: Re: LF: VO1NA - 137.7770 kHz > Hi Andy and thanks for the report and gratifying info on the stability. > It seems to be working quite well and the frequency reports are > very good, given that the DDS resolution is about 15 mHz. > > To Jay, thanks for the info on your RX ant. This explains why the sigs > are not seen sometimes, but there is still some directionality with > the wire (assuming the tower to be omni). The wire actually appears to > have some gain towards the east, but is weaker than the tower towards > the west. The wire is also lower than the tower. > > Graham, G0NBD, could you suggest a good QRG for OP32 now that the TX > is no longer rock bound on 137.777 kHz as it has been for the past decade. > > Incidently, last month marked the 10th anniversary of the reception by > Alan, G3NYK of my QRSS75 on 137.777 kHz. This was the first TA signal > received from NL Canada. The source was an old Peggelsender running on > 13.7777 kHz divided down by a pair of 7490 decade counters. It was not > very stable and so was replaced by a 13.7 MHz xtal in a ocxo. > > The TX will be on again tonight with hourly QRSS30 starting 0000 utc. > > 73 & GL > Joe VO1NA > > On Thu, 6 Jun 2013, Andre Guyé wrote: > >> Hello Joe, >> >> No problem. As usual, your QRSS signal gave here a strong trace this >> morning with peak around 0230 TU. Stable signal better than .005 Hz / 2 >> hours, no chirp. > This electronic communication is governed by the terms and conditions at > http://www.mun.ca/cc/policies/electronic_communications_disclaimer_2012.php >