Return-Path: Received: from rly-mg04.mx.aol.com (rly-mg04.mail.aol.com [172.20.83.110]) by air-mg02.mail.aol.com (v121_r3.13) with ESMTP id MAILINMG022-a0749005a11165; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 07:03:55 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-mg04.mx.aol.com (v121_r3.13) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINMG041-a0749005a11165; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 07:03:49 -0400 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1KsxyI-0002hR-Iw for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:03:18 +0100 Received: from [83.244.159.144] (helo=relay3.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1KsxyH-0002hE-Qr for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:03:17 +0100 Received: from smtp818.mail.ird.yahoo.com ([77.238.189.18]) by relay3.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1KsxyG-0004AH-Rf for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:03:17 +0100 Received: (qmail 94439 invoked from network); 23 Oct 2008 11:03:10 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btinternet.com; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE; b=vgfpOPor5xLyYH/radBa0iuOZWe8G7kKDHLVWBLC+JyPzV+Dh0QPZnq6Munei2Rchjt+oXoENVDO+w1wARd9s0emJTlUDMKbBoBOHBN2oved17D4ocN0n7gZM09Fj47VdED6yHNMxUYJD2BY5JU/UAtxE1A7B5WhJrXK0OMquPM= ; Received: from unknown (HELO DennisPC) (dennis.easterling@86.133.87.232 with login) by smtp818.mail.ird.yahoo.com with SMTP; 23 Oct 2008 11:03:09 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: Pa_JOX4VM1minCZhCdjBKqr9epz.xuSS4HNq1iV12DOOf6xIhBNneiEE0UD7KlV8mq5t9AbAOgM_SRihHdkgzqneHhsxNZbtIho680BWy2VT47V1GM8HSBXeBOm6oYV9RtrPszxLRZgw6_cijPX6DuXk X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Message-ID: <0F37281741714A1B86C48E1EF86E47A6@DennisPC> From: "DENNIS EASTERLING" To: References: <005401c93157$a8203a90$6401a8c0@asus> <00D6E9FD969E46C9B3983B8076E9D9C1@DennisPC> <66A641F5B60A40E8A0758CF5E0B68EE7@AGB> In-Reply-To: <66A641F5B60A40E8A0758CF5E0B68EE7@AGB> Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:02:53 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6000.16480 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6000.16669 DomainKey-Status: good (testing) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001 Subject: Re: LF: Re: RTTY QSO 500 KHz Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0039_01C93507.478A02C0" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=HTML_50_60,HTML_MESSAGE, MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: domain : post.thorcom.com ; SPF_helo = n X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: domain : btinternet.com ; SPF_822_from = n ------=_NextPart_000_0039_01C93507.478A02C0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Graham I suddenly noticed your other query, my location is Biggleswade, locator IO9= 2UC. 73 Dennis M0JXM ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Graham=20 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2008 10:03 PM Subject: Re: LF: Re: RTTY QSO 500 KHz Dennis, Interesting on the rtty contact, what method are you using for 'tx' ? What is your locator square ? you may be in the 'dead zone' in terns of di= stance , Gary and myself are roughly the same distance north , but after 70=20= miles or so ,there is a 'dead zone' till about 200 , I don't know, may be a=20= band 100 miles wide after that, that's a problem with the band and as you ca= n see at 600 miles, signals show up quite well at Shetland, while not showi= ng at Glasgow=20 I posted this 18/10 , : was that you on cw ?=20 Seeing a very low signal on 502.350 no audio .. looks like a cw cq call ?= 60 second tx with 'gap'=20 35 ft top load .. no atu ... ft897-d atten 'on'=20 G=20 G0NBD IO83LK=20 From: DENNIS EASTERLING=20 Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2008 5:54 PM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Subject: LF: Re: RTTY QSO 500 KHz Hi Gary You may have heared me using RTTY on the 18th as I had a QSO with Chris G3= XIZ earlier which went wrong, and was testing my TX later during your QSO wi= th him. My main problem is that I appear to be getting our reasonably well= , but not so good on receive so didn't hear you. Sorry about that. I am working on the receive problem which is probably=20= due to high QRN at my location. 73 Dennis M0JXM ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Gary - G4WGT=20 To: LF -RSGB LF Group=20 Sent: Saturday, October 18, 2008 8:28 PM Subject: LF: RTTY QSO 500 KHz Hi LF, =20 Just had a good RTTY QSO with Chris G3XIZ. =20 Is there any other station can use RTTY, 45 Baud, 85 Hz shift ? =20 Please look for my CQ calls on 503.600 KHz =20 73, =20 Gary - G4WGT - IO83QP. =20 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------= -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com=20 Version: 8.0.175 / Virus Database: 270.8.2/1739 - Release Date: 10/22/2008= 07:23 ------=_NextPart_000_0039_01C93507.478A02C0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Graham
 
I suddenly noticed your other query, my loc= ation is=20 Biggleswade, locator IO92UC.
 
73 Dennis M0JXM
----- Original Message -----
Graham
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2008 1= 0:03=20 PM
Subject: Re: LF: Re: RTTY QSO 500=20 KHz

Dennis,
 
Interesting on the rtty contact, what met= hod are=20 you using for 'tx' ?
 
What is your locator square ? you may be=20= in the=20 'dead zone' in terns of distance , Gary and myself are roughly the same=20 distance north , but after 70 miles or so ,there is a 'dead zone' till abo= ut=20 200 , I don't know, may be a band 100 miles wide after that, that's a prob= lem=20 with the band and as you can see at 600 miles, signals show up  quite= =20 well at Shetland, while not showing at Glasgow
 
 
 
I posted this 18/10 , :  was th= at you=20 on cw ?
 
Seeing a very  low signal on 502.350= no=20 audio .. looks like a cw cq call ?  60 second tx with 'gap'
 
35 ft top load .. no atu ... ft897-d = ; atten=20 'on'
 
G
 
G0NBD
 
IO83LK

Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2008 5:54 PM
Subject: LF: Re: RTTY QSO 500 KHz

Hi Gary
 
You may have heared me using RTTY on the=20= 18th as=20 I had a QSO with Chris G3XIZ earlier which went wrong, and was testing my=20= TX=20 later during your QSO with him.   My main problem is that I appe= ar=20 to be getting our reasonably well, but not so good on receive so didn't he= ar=20 you.
Sorry about that.   I am workin= g on the=20 receive problem which is probably due to high QRN at my location.
 
73 Dennis M0JXM
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, October 18, 2008=20= 8:28=20 PM
Subject: LF: RTTY QSO 500 KHz

Hi=20 LF,

 

Just had a=20 good RTTY QSO with Chris G3XIZ.

 

Is there any=20 other station can use RTTY, 45 Baud, 85 Hz shift=20 ?

 

Please look=20 for my CQ calls on 503.600 KHz

 

73,=

 

Gary - G4WGT -=20 IO83QP.

 


No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG -=20 http://www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.175 / Virus Database: 270.8.2/1739 -=20 Release Date: 10/22/2008 07:23
------=_NextPart_000_0039_01C93507.478A02C0--