Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30733 invoked from network); 11 Nov 2002 10:59:03 -0000 Received: from murphys.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.225) by mailstore with SMTP; 11 Nov 2002 10:59:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 3578 invoked from network); 11 Nov 2002 10:58:26 -0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by murphys.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 11 Nov 2002 10:58:26 -0000 X-SQ: A Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.10) id 18BCGh-0005fS-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Mon, 11 Nov 2002 10:58:11 +0000 Received: from [203.109.254.43] (helo=grunt3.ihug.co.nz) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 18BCGg-0005fF-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 11 Nov 2002 10:58:11 +0000 Received: from p42-max17.chc.ihug.co.nz (athlon) [203.173.228.42] by grunt3.ihug.co.nz with smtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18BCGa-0001W8-00; Mon, 11 Nov 2002 23:58:05 +1300 Message-ID: <09e901c28971$39cd97c0$0101a8c0@athlon> From: "Dave Brown" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <5.1.0.14.0.20021108112020.00aeef28@gemini.herts.ac.uk> <5.1.0.14.0.20021110135548.00a91d88@gemini.herts.ac.uk> Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2002 23:58:10 +1300 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Subject: Re: LF: To Ponder over the weekend Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.2 required=5.0tests=DEAR_SOMEBODY,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES, SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT_OEversion=2.42 Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Hi Jim While I have similar reservations there have been a few oil filled tuning caps used successfully here with tesla coils-not the best parallel to use but certainly close enough to make the prospect interesting and worth following up. No problems reported with fires as yet either! Thee are seemingly very few liquids that are readily available that have high permittivity, low RF loss and a half decent voltage withstand capability. Main issue is getting accurate rf loss data at relevant frequencies. And what happens to that loss when the voltage applied is raised to the sort of levels that are needed for this application? None of the usual info sources carry this sort of detail, so I have not been able to find very much information on this at all and will be doing some measurements this summer to prove the usefulness or otherwise of this technique. Summer? Well, this is definitely an 'outside in the open air' sort of activity!! 73 Dave ZL3FJ ----- Original Message ----- From: "James Moritz" To: Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 3:06 AM Subject: Re: LF: To Ponder over the weekend > Dear Dave, LF Group, > > At 08:43 09/11/2002 +1300, you wrote: > > The neat thing with the oil dielectric is it is basically self healing , > >even if it does arc over- no permanent capacitor damage will result as long > >as the power is shut off fast enough.. and that's the current issue-no pun > >intended! > > The un-neat thing about an oil dielectric is its propensity for catching > fire... also, I don't think it has particularly low loss at RF - although a > lot of big TX capacitors are oil-filled, the oil is there to increase the > breakdown voltage, rather than act as the main dielectric, which is usually > mica, I believe. > > Cheers, Jim Moritz > 73 de M0BMU > > >