Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-df04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 9983038000167; Sat, 10 Nov 2012 14:37:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TXGrc-00072u-Ai for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 10 Nov 2012 19:37:08 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TXGrb-00072l-Q6 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 10 Nov 2012 19:37:07 +0000 Received: from smtpout1.wanadoo.co.uk ([80.12.242.29] helo=smtpout.wanadoo.co.uk) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TXGra-0001HG-8K for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 10 Nov 2012 19:37:06 +0000 Received: from AGB ([2.26.22.1]) by mwinf5d10 with ME id Mvd41k00701QNh603vd4Qf; Sat, 10 Nov 2012 20:37:05 +0100 Message-ID: <0989F1664DA64B1FBA09B0E0E35FE7FD@AGB> From: "Graham" To: References: <004701cdbf73$90cb01a0$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> In-Reply-To: <004701cdbf73$90cb01a0$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2012 19:37:04 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Ok Mal At those signal levels , you could use a crystal set for Rx , 19:06 477 SM6BHZ de G3KEV Op8 529 mi -2 dB in SCARBOROUGH Its down the other end where the gain is , these are well past OP4 lower limit , but as you say its a question of speed [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.12.242.29 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: ead411ce91f9601ce3974c7575797436 Subject: Re: LF: OP8 V OP4 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0175_01CDBF7A.C3232C70" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=HTML_40_50,HTML_FONTCOLOR_BLUE, HTML_MESSAGE,MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40d8509ead14620d X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0175_01CDBF7A.C3232C70 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ok Mal=20 At those signal levels , you could use a crystal set for Rx , 19:06 477 SM6BHZ de G3KEV Op8 529 mi -2 dB in SCARBOROUGH Its down the other end where the gain is , these are well = past OP4 lower limit , but as you say its a question of speed =20 18:59 477 DF1VB de G0NBD Op8 466 mi -31 dB in Nr Liverpool with 65w + = Inverted L 17:41 477 DF1VB de G0KTN Op8 427 mi -33 dB in Bath, UK IO81 with 65w + = Inverted=20 G.. From: mal hamilton=20 Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2012 6:45 PM To: rsgb=20 Subject: LF: OP8 V OP4 Graham Op 8 doing well but OP4 equally good with me and faster.=20 My RX antenna is 40 metre vert quad loop resonated for 500 Khz. My main = antenna would be even better gl mal/g3kev ------=_NextPart_000_0175_01CDBF7A.C3232C70 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Ok Mal
 
At those  signal  levels  , you  could  = use=20 a  crystal  set for  Rx  ,

19:06 477 SM6BHZ de G3KEV Op8 529 mi -2 dB in=20 SCARBOROUGH

Its  down the  other  end  where  = the =20 gain  is  , these  are   well past OP4  lower = limit ,=20 but  as  you  say its a  question  of  = speed =20
 
18:59 477 DF1VB de=20 G0NBD Op8 466 mi -31 dB in Nr Liverpool with 65w + Inverted=20 L

17:41 477 DF1VB de G0KTN Op8 427 mi -33 dB in Bath, UK IO81 with 65w = +=20 Inverted

G..

Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2012 6:45 PM
To: rsgb
Subject: LF: OP8 V OP4

    Graham
Op 8 doing well but OP4 equally good with me and = faster.=20
My RX antenna is 40 metre vert quad loop = resonated for 500=20 Khz. My main antenna would be even better
 
gl mal/g3kev
 
------=_NextPart_000_0175_01CDBF7A.C3232C70--