Return-Path: X-Spam-DCC: paranoid 1170; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL autolearn=no version=3.1.3 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by paranoid.lipkowski.org (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id t83CltVc023510 for ; Thu, 3 Sep 2015 14:47:55 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1ZXTsv-00035m-5Y for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 03 Sep 2015 13:44:57 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1ZXTsu-00035d-St for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 03 Sep 2015 13:44:56 +0100 Received: from vms173023pub.verizon.net ([206.46.173.23]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.86) (envelope-from ) id 1ZXTrq-00087m-Tz for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 03 Sep 2015 13:44:55 +0100 Received: from MichaelSappPC ([173.75.43.102]) by vms173023.mailsrvcs.net (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.32.0 64bit (built Jul 16 2014)) with ESMTPA id <0NU300JH9PZZUA30@vms173023.mailsrvcs.net> for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 03 Sep 2015 07:43:11 -0500 (CDT) X-CMAE-Score: 0 X-CMAE-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=J+9Xl1TS c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=1rV2ZwJUHTv/Ia23wffMoA==:117 a=o1OHuDzbAAAA:8 a=oR5dmqMzAAAA:8 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=ff-B7xzCdYMA:10 a=VVlED5B4AAAA:8 a=F3M5lZpKAAAA:8 a=V1-kY5AnAAAA:20 a=SC0-0qhyEN-I70AYR3EA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 Message-id: <0981E79236EE4643B62A60EC21CA1407@MichaelSappPC> From: "Michael Sapp" To: References: <55E834F5.5050008@gmx.net> In-reply-to: <55E834F5.5050008@gmx.net> Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2015 08:43:05 -0400 MIME-version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6002.18197 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6002.18463 X-Scan-Signature: 33d261536bb1467bb13d5764461d5ec4 Subject: Re: LF: Odd sunset captures Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=iso-8859-1; reply-type=response Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 10.1.3.10 Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 4027 Tobias: Thank you for the explanation, I was aware of the multi-part transmission format, but not sure of the significance in this capture instance. 73, Mike wa3tts ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tobias DG3LV" To: Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2015 7:54 AM Subject: Re: LF: Odd sunset captures > Hi Mike ! > > Your screenshot shows Stefan's Callsign as "". This means it was > (identified as) one part of a multi-part transmission. To correlate those > sequential transmissions WSPR uses a hash-table to identify the > corresponding parts. In your case the 23:04 reception was erroneously > correlated to a prior(!) transmission of Stefan. As the "decoded" grid is > not a legal gridsquare, you can be shure the decoding is one of the rare > incidents, where the significance threshold of the WSPR-decoder was still > too low to eliminate false decodings. This happens from time to time, but > you can identify those easily by inspecting the callsign or the gridsquare > which are either illegal or implausible. > > 73 de dg3lv Tobias > > Am 03.09.2015 um 02:18 schrieb Michael Sapp: >> Hi All: I'm not sure what to think of this.... >> https://www.dropbox.com/s/xwnopmbl2fz5ye5/IMG_4537.JPG?dl=0 >> I have been experimenting with IF shifting my radio to get WG2XJM very >> strong signal 10 to 13 dB down the IF bandpass >> curve to improve weak signal reception of other stations when Eric is >> transmitting. Odd sunset partial captures appear >> to be transatlantic, but I am not sure about reality with this data. My >> EWE antenna was configured to favor a SE direction, but with >> 120 degree 3dB beam width pattern it covers the NE as well. Long >> distance transition zone propagation is a possibility, but I >> would be hesitant to claim it not having received correct grid square >> information...... >> 73, Mike wa3tts >