Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.237.98 with SMTP id vb2csp88117igc; Sun, 16 Feb 2014 10:16:55 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.194.60.16 with SMTP id d16mr2205810wjr.46.1392574614115; Sun, 16 Feb 2014 10:16:54 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id n6si8602143wjf.5.2014.02.16.10.16.53 for ; Sun, 16 Feb 2014 10:16:54 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1WF5uR-0001w7-9c for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 16 Feb 2014 17:53:43 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1WF5uQ-0001vy-L4 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 16 Feb 2014 17:53:42 +0000 Received: from out1.ip02ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.238]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1WF5uO-0000rv-N9 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 16 Feb 2014 17:53:41 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgoNAM/6AFNcHnYs/2dsb2JhbABZgwaEEYU+tnEDAoEOF3SCIAUBAQQBCAEBGRUeAQEmBgEBAwUCAQMRBAEBAwIFIQICFAEEGgYWCAYTCAIBAgMBh2ADCQyodaE9gSmLPoIngmk1gRQBA48pmyaDLTw X-IPAS-Result: AgoNAM/6AFNcHnYs/2dsb2JhbABZgwaEEYU+tnEDAoEOF3SCIAUBAQQBCAEBGRUeAQEmBgEBAwUCAQMRBAEBAwIFIQICFAEEGgYWCAYTCAIBAgMBh2ADCQyodaE9gSmLPoIngmk1gRQBA48pmyaDLTw X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,856,1384300800"; d="scan'208";a="454414056" Received: from host-92-30-118-44.as13285.net (HELO your91hoehfy9g) ([92.30.118.44]) by out1.ip02ir2.opaltelecom.net with SMTP; 16 Feb 2014 17:53:40 +0000 Message-ID: <082D9936B08D4C7AB1F9167FB0637F0A@your91hoehfy9g> From: "mal hamilton" To: References: Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2014 16:22:41 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5931 X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Chris You have the same problem on 630 metres. I and others have replied to your CQ calls but you do not reply and yet I am received in UA3, 5B4, 4X4 and others in EU to my East and to the West I have worked the USA. Lately I have been working OPERA OP4 and every evening I get decodes from RX3, SV8, I2 stns and others in the EU es the UK I do now operate at the optimum time for the USA so nil to the West If you need other confirmation read the emails on this reflector relating to OPERA on 477 Khz I suspect you have environmental QRM/QRN problems at your QTH inhibiting reception on LF/MF. You seem only to QSO local stations near your QTH [...] Content analysis details: (0.2 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.2 STOX_REPLY_TYPE STOX_REPLY_TYPE -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record X-Scan-Signature: 42bbe44aa18353e845a65753486d556c Subject: Re: LF: LF Activity - G3XIZ Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="utf-8"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.6 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Chris You have the same problem on 630 metres. I and others have replied to your CQ calls but you do not reply and yet I am received in UA3, 5B4, 4X4 and others in EU to my East and to the West I have worked the USA. Lately I have been working OPERA OP4 and every evening I get decodes from RX3, SV8, I2 stns and others in the EU es the UK I do now operate at the optimum time for the USA so nil to the West If you need other confirmation read the emails on this reflector relating to OPERA on 477 Khz I suspect you have environmental QRM/QRN problems at your QTH inhibiting reception on LF/MF. You seem only to QSO local stations near your QTH de G3KEV ----- Original Message ----- From: "C. Groeger" To: Sent: Sunday, February 16, 2014 10:30 AM Subject: Re: LF: LF Activity - G3XIZ > Mal, > We tried cw on lf last year, do you remember? > Your sigs were not audible here and only visible on twente but not audible > there. > I wonder how did you manage all this dx which such a poor signal? > 73, df5qg > > Christian Groeger > > mal hamilton schrieb: > >>Stefan es co >>Ever since the introduction of data modes 137 has gradually gone down >>hill. In the days of CW and QRSS QSO mode there were over 30 countries >>active, also BEACON mode does not help. >>The band was at its best when QSO mode was the preferred choice, DATA >>MODES and NON STOP BEACONS chased all of the CW operators away to other >>bands like 160 metres. >>I have a shack full of LF equipment and Antennas to match but never hear >>any CW acty so have gone else where like 630 and 160 metres plus all the >>other HF bands >> >>73 de mal/g3kev >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: schaefer >> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >> Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2014 4:12 PM >> Subject: Re: LF: LF Activity - G3XIZ >> >> >> Hello Chris, >> >> Unfortunately i do not have much time this evening. However i will be in >> the shack again sunday evening, if you like to try then. I can set up a >> CW beacon on LF if you like but that does not help much in terms of QSO >> activity. >> >> Who is ready and interested and audible in CW on LF these days? >> >> What would you think is the reason for the non-activity? >> >> One reason must be the higher noisefloor, several dB higher than 2001 i >> assume, at least in urban locations. But that can't be the only reason. >> Is it the 1000 different modes or the new 630m band? Is it the >> availability of the internet? Or did "we" just became tired? Or >> combinations of that? :-) >> >> 73, Stefan/DK7FC >> >> Am 15.02.2014 14:25, schrieb Chris Osborn: >> LF, >> >> >> I am at present puttng out test signals on 137.7 kHz should anyone >> wish to check their RX. >> >> >> I shall be QRV on 137.7 kHz this evening from about 18.00Z again >> putting out test signals and also some CQ calls using QRSS / DFCW >> I can try CW if conditions seem favourable. >> >> >> >> It would be a shame if after Dave's excellent LF / MF artical in >> RadCom would-be ops took a listen on those bands and heard no amateur >> activity. >> >> >> A quick look in my LF receive logbook for 2001 for this weekend >> (actually 17/18 Feb) recorded the following stations - all on 136.5 kHz >> CW: >> >> >> DJ9IE (3 times) >> >> F6CNI >> G3BDQ >> GW4ALG (2 times) >> >> EI0CF (2 times) >> >> GW4HXO >> G3XDV (2 times) >> >> G8RW >> G6NB >> GM3YXM/P >> SM6PXJ >> G6RO >> ON7ZO >> PA0BWL >> >> >> Happy days! >> >> >> 73 >> Chris G3XIZ