Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.96.198 with SMTP id du6csp349390igb; Wed, 6 Nov 2013 00:50:15 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.180.182.82 with SMTP id ec18mr1499733wic.13.1383727814837; Wed, 06 Nov 2013 00:50:14 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id bf10si10521860wjc.69.2013.11.06.00.50.14 for ; Wed, 06 Nov 2013 00:50:14 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@comcast.net Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1VdyMs-0003gW-MJ for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 06 Nov 2013 08:21:38 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1VdyMs-0003gN-33 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 06 Nov 2013 08:21:38 +0000 Received: from qmta03.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.32]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1VdyMp-0006VG-W0 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 06 Nov 2013 08:21:36 +0000 Received: from omta06.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.51]) by qmta03.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id m8Lm1m00716AWCUA38MZrz; Wed, 06 Nov 2013 08:21:33 +0000 Received: from Owner ([166.147.71.189]) by omta06.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id m8MB1m00F451mrJ8S8MHqy; Wed, 06 Nov 2013 08:21:28 +0000 From: "hvanesce" To: References: ,<07b801ceda96$deca1be0$9c5e53a0$@comcast.net> <07db01ceda9b$17f8a400$47e9ec00$@comcast.net> <5279F0F6.6020808@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <5279F0F6.6020808@gmx.de> Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2013 02:21:03 -0600 Message-ID: <082101cedac9$2c3007f0$849017d0$@comcast.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQI6ma873u+i9oIZdmDldQaARxRDZQJ5dehvAb3wuJADSAPs9AFpV+IwmPkX+hA= Content-Language: en-us DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20121106; t=1383726093; bh=MLrk/ofQoAA/2MzKmMIN4UeSw210TCeMdP+6LJ+l9aM=; h=Received:Received:From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version: Content-Type; b=T0DHQfmCPAbz2YF1oY8XKg3Il6ij38yJ4dne4htolgcKwweywwgXWEx3J4wrIN/4y cZ3KRnyMBVSaD92WfKUub9E7nyfgvMpnrV5Zn5IhPLuKyQEJKFCiIheqIgNWIj7GiZ M5fEKmM1LjDj62CNyMFCNxJVKOBpGn6727J6djptY1FHEoIIVk+oYsRyuQpZJre4eR /CSnEpHpIVK66qfuXa0unkS4SiqrWjFrYiferqRo8Da8Oi25kpr1v17Mj7ecN1D/Va LNUKUYA8+zifL3Xc7QW+WfxarXwjGcMBGHlhoHg1fqI0qKGA2GO7Gc4Qn4LV2yNF8n FYSiO4rPwgmZA== X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Thanks Hartmut, Jim AA5BW Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [76.96.30.32 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (hvanesce[at]comcast.net) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 2e2f7cbbe9f38dd7bf3fac4fc012e6fc Subject: RE: LF: RE: 74.5495 was looking good... Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 1596 Thanks Hartmut, Jim AA5BW -----Original Message----- From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Hartmut Wolff Sent: Wednesday, November 6, 2013 1:34 AM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: LF: RE: 74.5495 was looking good... Jim, Bob and LF, Am 06.11.2013 03:51, schrieb hvanesce: > I originally attributed that noise burst around (2200?) to cultural > noise local to Hartmut. Seemed too strong and broad to be a traveling > wave. But your comment had me reconsidering; and I then wondered if > the noise burst could be correlated with the event that John > (KB5NJD/WG2XIQ) just reported (thanks John). The noise was produced by the local weather: heavy rain and wind 73 Hartmut