X-GM-THRID: 1212253037230836076
X-Gmail-Labels: rsgb lf
X-Gmail-Received: 4979821431ff4018995b043607cec06b95013868
Delivered-To: daveyxm@gmail.com
Received: by 10.64.249.16 with SMTP id w16cs132161qbh;
Sun, 20 Aug 2006 12:43:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.48.210.16 with SMTP id i16mr6828830nfg;
Sun, 20 Aug 2006 12:43:20 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20])
by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id k24si1492551nfc.2006.08.20.12.43.20;
Sun, 20 Aug 2006 12:43:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: neutral (gmail.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org)
Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14)
id 1GEt87-0000SN-Ff
for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 20:38:43 +0100
Received: from [193.82.59.130] (helo=relay2.thorcom.net)
by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14)
id 1GEt86-0000SD-TP
for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 20:38:42 +0100
Received: from rwcrmhc12.comcast.net ([216.148.227.152])
by relay2.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51)
id 1GEt82-0000mZ-FQ
for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 20:38:42 +0100
Received: from rmailcenter04.comcast.net ([204.127.197.114])
by comcast.net (rwcrmhc12) with SMTP
id <20060820193754m12001ai9ge>; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 19:37:54 +0000
Received: from [24.91.125.179] by rmailcenter04.comcast.net;
Sun, 20 Aug 2006 19:37:53 +0000
From: k2ors@comcast.net (Warren K2ORS/WD2XGJ)
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 19:37:53 +0000
Message-Id: <082020061937.14586.44E8BA110002B63D000038FA22007503300B97010D0A020E06979D0E03@comcast.net>
X-Mailer: AT&T Message Center Version 1 (Apr 11 2006)
X-Authenticated-Sender: bWFyeWphbmVib3lkQGNvbWNhc3QubmV0
X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/)
X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,AWL=-0.647
Subject: Re: LF: re: modifying xtals etc.
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 6918
Hi Niels,
> is one employing an inductance in series with the crystal. (Such oscillators
> sometimes are termed "VXOs"). As always, there is a price to pay: The
> frequency stability is impaired.
Yes, I tried a VXO circuit but it did not have sifficient stability for QRSS work. O.K. for hand keyed cw though.
--
73 Warren K2ORS/WD2XGJ
FN42hi
http://www.w4dex.com/wd2xgj.htm