Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.96.198 with SMTP id du6csp335168igb; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 19:35:22 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.194.241.228 with SMTP id wl4mr746449wjc.2.1383708920196; Tue, 05 Nov 2013 19:35:20 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id eq5si3312428wib.34.2013.11.05.19.35.19 for ; Tue, 05 Nov 2013 19:35:20 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@comcast.net Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1VdtUl-0002nI-Q7 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 06 Nov 2013 03:09:27 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1VdtUk-0002n9-Uq for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 06 Nov 2013 03:09:26 +0000 Received: from qmta09.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.96]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1VdtUh-0005UI-JC for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 06 Nov 2013 03:09:25 +0000 Received: from omta23.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.90]) by qmta09.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id m36L1m0031wfjNsA939Mxd; Wed, 06 Nov 2013 03:09:21 +0000 Received: from Owner ([166.147.71.189]) by omta23.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id m38z1m006451mrJ8j395jp; Wed, 06 Nov 2013 03:09:16 +0000 From: "hvanesce" To: References: ,<07b801ceda96$deca1be0$9c5e53a0$@comcast.net> ,<07db01ceda9b$17f8a400$47e9ec00$@comcast.net> In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2013 21:08:51 -0600 Message-ID: <07ec01ceda9d$8eeed320$accc7960$@comcast.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQI6ma873u+i9oIZdmDldQaARxRDZQJ5dehvAb3wuJADSAPs9ALS6MW1mO109oA= Content-Language: en-us DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20121106; t=1383707361; bh=/ypQBqShMMi/OvkpqFiXYlsRXkwmjKKHEpjtUWx6Z3U=; h=Received:Received:From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version: Content-Type; b=gTU2gtw+9IRCNLFE4tDRNmVnMnh8RLxD1MWEFMcF/qEM+nQW2mjJ6dl4w8LSVnOGN y3P1pCW1CMI/zGbBMUy8My6NvYdzCvfPWuBuY8O98cim4mKpAHgLQl7GiQ2S7FrqJ0 qQLWxDaiPxnrU1R3tOh5CfBzZNSmbS0hwjEP8R8InxuDMlhImgRU3Sz7K3yKdKgvf6 RBxHET67tEj2uO73JC0m/T+X6ug2lpuFEIh+ivPIw9M+fhUqBMw9MqxjgPBcXCVuXy kVe161yCcQtGCTWOqsAnNCGmbAn+itY1rozUvz4gl7lELbxyW6WAqlD+WNTNIhPOC0 w6bB/7Nn+9qgw== X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Good luck! From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Bob Raide Sent: Tuesday, November 5, 2013 8:58 PM To: RE: LF: RE: 74.5495 was looking good... [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [76.96.30.96 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (hvanesce[at]comcast.net) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 98008414004cfc60a8b07784a56e6dc8 Subject: RE: LF: RE: 74.5495 was looking good... Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_07ED_01CEDA6B.4455C2B0" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=HTML_70_80,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 1595 This is a multipart message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_07ED_01CEDA6B.4455C2B0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Good luck! From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Bob Raide Sent: Tuesday, November 5, 2013 8:58 PM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: RE: LF: RE: 74.5495 was looking good... Guess that would be a question for Hartmut in the morning-Bob I am going to change to 474.2 dial freq WSPR2 and see if can do anything T/A-Bob _____ From: hvanesce@comcast.net To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2013 20:51:12 -0600 Subject: RE: LF: RE: 74.5495 was looking good... Yes Bob, I originally attributed that noise burst around (2200?) to cultural noise local to Hartmut. Seemed too strong and broad to be a traveling wave. But your comment had me reconsidering; and I then wondered if the noise burst could be correlated with the event that John (KB5NJD/WG2XIQ) just reported (thanks John). Bob, the time scale on Hartmut's grabber plot is skewed at 2200 (in the image generated at 0215). Is that skew something that the plotter does to move the timestamp away from the date stamp? In other words, is the noise burst in Hartmut's plot after 2212, i.e. coincident with the event that John reported? 73, Jim AA5BW From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Bob Raide Sent: Tuesday, November 5, 2013 8:33 PM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: RE: LF: RE: 74.5495 was looking good... Jim; Did you look at Hartmut's grabber? Just before I started transmitting there are these big blotches that look like noise of some kind. _____ From: hvanesce@comcast.net To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2013 20:20:59 -0600 Subject: LF: RE: 74.5495 was looking good... Bob, This is puzzling; it doesn't seem to be attributable to any of the usual suspects , including Dst indices, terminator, equipment. Atypical in many ways from historical trends of your signal. Watching with interest! 73, Jim AA5BW From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Bob Raide Sent: Tuesday, November 5, 2013 7:31 PM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: LF: 74.5495 was looking good... Looked like all of a sudden at around 2350 my transmitter blew up! But transmitter still at full smoke just no propagation-Bob WG2XRS/4... ------=_NextPart_000_07ED_01CEDA6B.4455C2B0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Good luck!

 

From:= = owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org = [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Bob = Raide
Sent: Tuesday, November 5, 2013 8:58 PM
To: = rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: RE: LF: RE: 74.5495 was = looking good...

 

Guess that would be a = question for Hartmut in the morning-Bob
I am going to change to 474.2 = dial freq WSPR2 and see if can do anything = T/A-Bob
 

From: hvanesce@comcast.net
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2013 20:51:12 -0600
Subject: RE: LF: RE: = 74.5495 was looking good...

Yes Bob,

 

I originally attributed that noise burst around (2200?) to cultural = noise local to Hartmut. Seemed too strong and broad to be a traveling = wave.  But your comment had me reconsidering; and I then wondered = if the noise burst could be correlated with the event that John = (KB5NJD/WG2XIQ) just reported (thanks John).

 

Bob, the time scale on Hartmut’s grabber plot is skewed at 2200 = (in the image generated at 0215). Is that skew something that the = plotter does to move the timestamp away from the date stamp? In other = words, is the noise burst in Hartmut’s plot after 2212, i.e. = coincident with the event that John reported?

 

73,

 

Jim AA5BW

 

 

<= div style=3D'border:none;border-top:solid windowtext 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt = 0in 0in 0in;border-color:currentColor currentColor'>

From:= = owner-rsgb_lf_group@bl= acksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_g= roup@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Bob Raide
Sent: = Tuesday, November 5, 2013 8:33 PM
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=
Subject: RE: LF: RE: 74.5495 was looking = good...

=

 

=

Jim;
Did you look at = Hartmut's grabber?
Just before I started transmitting there are these = big blotches that look like noise of some = kind.
 

From: hvanesce@comcast.net
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2013 20:20:59 -0600
Subject: LF: RE: 74.5495 = was looking good...

Bob,

 

This is puzzling; it doesn’t seem to be attributable to any of = the usual suspects , including Dst indices, terminator, = equipment.

 

Atypical in many ways from historical trends of your signal. =

 

Watching with interest!

 

73,

 

Jim AA5BW

 

<= div style=3D'border:none;border-top:solid windowtext 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt = 0in 0in 0in;border-color:currentColor'>

From:= = owner-rsgb_lf_group@bl= acksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_g= roup@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Bob Raide
Sent: = Tuesday, November 5, 2013 7:31 PM
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=
Subject: LF: 74.5495 was looking good...

=

 

=

Looked like all of a sudden = at around 2350 my transmitter blew up!  But transmitter still at = full smoke just no propagation-Bob WG2XRS/4... =

------=_NextPart_000_07ED_01CEDA6B.4455C2B0--