Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-ma05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 5A1C5380000B3; Thu, 2 May 2013 18:45:38 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1UY1l8-0006AL-79 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 02 May 2013 23:13:50 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1UY1l7-0006AC-KP for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 02 May 2013 23:13:49 +0100 Received: from nm1-vm6.bt.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com ([212.82.99.216]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1UY1l5-0001RU-Nf for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 02 May 2013 23:13:48 +0100 Received: from [212.82.98.42] by nm1.bt.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 02 May 2013 22:13:26 -0000 Received: from [46.228.39.165] by tm3.bt.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 02 May 2013 22:13:26 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp106.bt.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 02 May 2013 22:13:26 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=s1024; t=1367532806; bh=2Hw+gjIq+L4ZvVkB5HGkS4DfLwwPzcmdJM0cAvgCXZ8=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-Rocket-Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-Antivirus:X-Antivirus-Status; b=hpZUFTT8eQ7GNxgj5/EmD3QPf+hacmV9mTr5Ubg0C/VX5UVmFXXsSTATkrclrV9dile/YQ8Gpfv3FO8dwGNTD0B8GgAviLcLgjRRwfGP2dpNh6VUH3Rc90VJ8j2xOfWv5DNwpTa7cVOJyJUIRhfThSHqW3tudRij1QYJMuE+I7s= X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 627510.3074.bm@smtp106.bt.mail.ir2.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: IUh91O0VM1mNRvNuXrfwjfrnMSB5P84plpUORIPQ0cz728N jRw7kNoPh9FjMvnmMslVC1oHZvddZjeGcdFOvW1aqrTveOA4VQ4r25kB.JWJ vlXFX2rCRlS2STu6bIBu7Fh63kkssVVNbGTxZngUDgPAN668dvMIolKn9uYD I.X4ct8rnwsHEfnhI.W_AjpU22VxJnisK0didm99PkWOvRCEVSLqqg3rzDrh mRgb8uTKt2W8TKnpmBAMJZgOvyLu6Zcmg0DX39pcqM.amQs138n1SXSnvqZb EV60OJWyTEAAO2DBlKVdrqQxiBWJfhl0P7NMgXop0lDa9oNxzffxcVpcUKq. O9MN3IO7IflyO7r5Be7OqkJ0L18HzWhVSc65EJeEhalP4m8xwypqEeMhpIo2 Swc_GwJuSk84v1qG3R5I2.OBYKxtmqcsnYOlwn48TOi950_MNfd5lNjjq87S UzTMVqlaZ0LSB X-Yahoo-SMTP: fpz.2VeswBBs59bVshRPmMN51lcO2lgFRIvE4XTqE8dRwOxd70E- X-Rocket-Received: from gnat (alan.melia@86.167.13.182 with login) by smtp106.bt.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 02 May 2013 22:13:26 +0000 UTC Message-ID: <07C35397E99A4E36ACAD6EECB24B07D3@gnat> From: "Alan Melia" To: References: Date: Thu, 2 May 2013 23:13:21 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 130502-0, 02/05/2013), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: The S is fast schottky logic and will pull more current per chip than LS or TTL and will probably be slightly faster (I think without getting the spec sheets out) LS draws less current than standard TTL but is as fast or in some cases slightly faster. The functionality is of cource exactly the same. LS will probably replace any standard TTL logic though it depends on the quality of the design to be sure that you dont get timing or race problems. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [212.82.99.216 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: f64a6c8ea7591cecbecc6db95ffdd328 Subject: LF: Re: 74LS196N 74S196N Difference ?? L or LS Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0046_01CE478A.A3B57440" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.1 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK,HTML_40_50, HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mtain-ma05.r1000.mx.aol.com ; domain : btinternet.com DKIM : fail x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d600d5182ec9218bc X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0046_01CE478A.A3B57440 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable The S is fast schottky logic and will pull more current per chip than LS = or TTL and will probably be slightly faster (I think without getting the = spec sheets out) LS draws less current than standard TTL but is as fast = or in some cases slightly faster. The functionality is of cource exactly = the same. LS will probably replace any standard TTL logic though it = depends on the quality of the design to be sure that you dont get timing = or race problems. Alan G3NYK=20 ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Graham=20 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2013 10:45 PM Subject: LF: 74LS196N 74S196N Difference ?? L or LS 74LS196N 74S196N Difference ?? L or LS divider chip=20 What is the difference anyone ?? Tnx -G. ------=_NextPart_000_0046_01CE478A.A3B57440 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
The S is fast schottky logic and will = pull more=20 current per chip than LS or TTL and will probably be slightly = faster (I=20 think without getting the spec sheets out)  LS draws less current = than=20 standard TTL but is as fast or in some cases slightly faster. The = functionality=20 is of cource exactly the same. LS will probably replace any standard TTL = logic=20 though it depends on the quality of the design to be sure that you dont = get=20 timing or race problems.
 
Alan
G3NYK 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Graham
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2013 = 10:45=20 PM
Subject: LF: 74LS196N 74S196N = Difference=20 ?? L or LS

74LS196N    74S196N  Difference  ?? L = or =20 LS     divider   chip
 
What is the  difference  anyone  ??
 
 
 
Tnx -G.
 
  
------=_NextPart_000_0046_01CE478A.A3B57440--