Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25;
Message-ID: <078C0F3264AC405FB564DDCFE5E50C87@AGB>
From: "Graham" <g8fzk@g8fzk.fsnet.co.uk>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
References: <520410B1.4030700@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
In-Reply-To: <520410B1.4030700@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2013 23:31:57 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Importance: Normal
Subject: Re: LF: traces in VK7
Content-Type: text/plain;
	format=flowed;
	charset="ISO-8859-15";
	reply-type=response
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Status: O

Not forgetting  Marcu's   10 dB boost  package  , that  gives a 3  way 
split  Mr Pixel  , Op decode  and  Correlation  , all  for the  price  of 
one  , and  50%  power  saving , eco  friendly  as well :)

G,,

--------------------------------------------------
From: "Stefan Schäfer" <Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2013 10:42 PM
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Subject: LF: traces in VK7

> Hi LF,
>
> There are some very clear traces of my signal on Edgar's grabber, 
> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/101251787/testIDC.html  between 
> 20:30...21:00 UTC. But just a few pixels on the right frequency and time. 
> If one knows that it could be my call then it is clear. But for a first 
> detection i wouldn't call that "valid ID". Shows once again that OP32 or 
> WSPR-15 is much more challenging!
>
> That is the 2nd time since this season. The DCF-39 levels become very 
> clearly better now, in SNR and time.
>
> 73, Stefan/DK7FC
>
>
>