X-GM-THRID: 1238798748720296233 X-Gmail-Labels: rsgb lf Delivered-To: daveyxm@gmail.com Received: by 10.78.172.11 with SMTP id u11cs271753hue; Sat, 9 Jun 2007 11:50:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.82.162.14 with SMTP id k14mr7670508bue.1181415025646; Sat, 09 Jun 2007 11:50:25 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f8si3913756nfh.2007.06.09.11.50.23; Sat, 09 Jun 2007 11:50:25 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Hx5yX-000791-AL for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 09 Jun 2007 19:47:49 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Hx5yW-00078s-Pk for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 09 Jun 2007 19:47:48 +0100 Received: from rwcrmhc15.comcast.net ([216.148.227.155]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Hx5yT-0003bQ-2Y for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 09 Jun 2007 19:47:48 +0100 Received: from rmailcenter74.comcast.net ([204.127.197.156]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc15) with SMTP id <20070609184701m1500a4diqe>; Sat, 9 Jun 2007 18:47:01 +0000 Received: from [24.91.125.179] by rmailcenter74.comcast.net; Sat, 09 Jun 2007 18:46:59 +0000 From: k2ors@comcast.net To: Steve.Floyd@baesystems.com (Steve Floyd),rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org, rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Cc: "Andy Talbot" , "Linda Holtby" Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2007 18:46:59 +0000 Message-Id: <060920071846.14817.466AF5A3000AFB83000039E122073000330B97010D0A020E06979D0E03@comcast.net> X-Mailer: AT&T Message Center Version 1 (Oct 4 2006) X-Authenticated-Sender: bWFyeWphbmVib3lkQGNvbWNhc3QubmV0 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 1.6 (+) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,MIME_BOUND_NEXTPART=0.241,MIME_HTML_MOSTLY=0.699,MPART_ALT_DIFF=0.137,NO_REAL_NAME=0.55 Subject: Re: LF: MF Still on shifp? Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="NextPart_Webmail_9m3u9jl4l_14817_1181414819_0" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.4 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE, MIME_BOUND_NEXTPART,NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 1364 --NextPart_Webmail_9m3u9jl4l_14817_1181414819_0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi Andy, I think that is very possibly a 500kHz antenna. Steve Floyd W4YHD was on a cruise ship recently and they still had 500kHz equipment and were still monitoring! I have cc'd Steve on this e-mail in case he has some more information to add. BTW - Are the big wire cage antennas still atop the Ministry of Defence on Whitehall Street - last time I was in London (2003) they were still there. -- 73 Warren K2ORS/WD2XGJ/WD2XSH/23/WE2XEB/2 FN42hi http://www.w4dex.com/wd2xgj.htm -------------- Original message ---------------------- From: "Andy Talbot" > Yesterday I was watching two large cruise ships sail down Southampton water > (P&O ships, 'Artemis' and 'Aurora'). Both had a large wire antennas > strung between the masts, and in the case of Artemis this extended down at > each end close to bow and stern; and there may even have been two wire > side-by-side on this ship. A really long antenna. I'm not sure of the > length of these ships, but they could be 200 metres (ish), so even at the > bottom end of HF these are electrically long-wires. > Of course, the pair on Artemis, if I saw them correctly, could even be > phased for really high gain at HF - a Rhombic perhaps? > > Does anyone know if large modern ships still have MF, or a serious HF > presence? Or are the wire antenna(s ?) just there to hang flags from? Or > are they not even antennas, but just used for supporting decorations. > > Artemis also had a mass of big whips on the bow, which I assume were base > tuned HF - the normal VHF whips were practically invisible beside them. > Aurora presumably had something similar, but they weren't obvious. > > Needless to say, each ship had two large VSAT radomes, and three or four > smaller Inmarsat (and other satcom?) antennas. > > Andy G4JNT --NextPart_Webmail_9m3u9jl4l_14817_1181414819_0 Content-Type: message/rfc822 From: "Andy Talbot" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Cc: "Linda Holtby" Subject: LF: MF Still on shifp? Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2007 17:34:23 +0000 Content-Type: Multipart/alternative; boundary="NextPart_Webmail_9m3u9jl4l_14817_1181414819_1" --NextPart_Webmail_9m3u9jl4l_14817_1181414819_1 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline
Yesterday I was watching two large cruise ships sail down Southampton water (P&O ships,  'Artemis' and 'Aurora').   Both had a large wire antennas strung between the masts, and in the case of  Artemis this extended down at each end close to bow and stern; and there may even have been two wire side-by-side on this ship.  A really long antenna.   I'm not sure of the length of these ships, but they could  be 200 metres (ish), so even at the bottom end of HF these are electrically long-wires.   
Of course, the pair on Artemis, if I saw them correctly, could even be phased for really high gain at HF - a Rhombic perhaps?
 
Does anyone know if large modern ships still have MF, or a serious HF presence?  Or are the wire antenna(s ?) just there to hang flags from?  Or are they not even antennas, but just used for supporting decorations.
 
Artemis also had a mass of big whips on the bow, which I assume were base tuned HF - the normal VHF whips were practically invisible beside them.   Aurora presumably had something similar, but they weren't obvious.
 
Needless to say, each ship had two large VSAT radomes, and three or four smaller Inmarsat (and other satcom?) antennas.
 
Andy  G4JNT
--NextPart_Webmail_9m3u9jl4l_14817_1181414819_1-- --NextPart_Webmail_9m3u9jl4l_14817_1181414819_0--