Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.237.98 with SMTP id vb2csp644329igc; Fri, 27 Dec 2013 14:57:30 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.194.119.106 with SMTP id kt10mr8017280wjb.72.1388185049779; Fri, 27 Dec 2013 14:57:29 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id o9si13475528wjx.72.2013.12.27.14.57.29 for ; Fri, 27 Dec 2013 14:57:29 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@comcast.net Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Vwfns-0000Rg-KK for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 27 Dec 2013 22:22:48 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Vwfnr-0000RX-SB for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 27 Dec 2013 22:22:47 +0000 Received: from qmta12.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.59.227]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1Vwfnp-0004Hg-2C for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 27 Dec 2013 22:22:46 +0000 Received: from omta23.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.74]) by qmta12.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 6mCJ1n0031c6gX85CmNilk; Fri, 27 Dec 2013 22:22:42 +0000 Received: from Owner ([166.137.182.216]) by omta23.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 6mNM1n0014gYbxS3jmNTKd; Fri, 27 Dec 2013 22:22:37 +0000 From: "hvanesce" To: References: <039101cf0331$b32ebfe0$198c3fa0$@comcast.net> <52BDF628.7050001@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: <52BDF628.7050001@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2013 15:22:16 -0700 Message-ID: <041c01cf0352$2380d100$6a827300$@comcast.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQISvUhHNEhNcUdk0d/IWHtKqloawgGXFhaSmdRtoHA= Content-Language: en-us DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20121106; t=1388182962; bh=SLhc2S4WnZXj+ICuS7zN0PvKBqC55HG84ey2LTJ5bAk=; h=Received:Received:From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version: Content-Type; b=EZgaTPtsHTRbrB7EUZ1aF4vwJAfH1h2ZOKj4ioZNDM2wBR8RDFuBdIYXM1ehAUNPK WdTf6rmA/ouBx3hxep6RKUYbGZomVaXUFt27BTEbcBd/jQrdF5qDYzltBRS0DsAbiK lVaL41gDYZahNL+ZCFHbdvYd1/85tOSVN9qomU3zAuuHfHkN4dr+IWu0DqnjaPJ1O5 4kxKSkCXan6aAonSgjuWpBD6+i6JJTghukPeYBgf6+4V0hc5n0/ndc0Onz1mwGSdZk 1PsfJtNp5RXbqGmZiAFeJRwIHXWrYy40Sa9jOwijzo+oqo16V4KiA7saV4T68vOrNb KmxhrnltNqEkA== X-Spam-Score: 1.1 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Thank You Stefan, I’ve opened a window centered on 11904.76190; this will be very helpful, much appreciated. Thank you also for the confirmation of QRM. [...] Content analysis details: (1.1 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [76.96.59.227 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (hvanesce[at]comcast.net) 1.6 SUBJ_ALL_CAPS Subject is all capitals -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.6 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 09c1a181dc7b5fd4ce37590584a561d1 Subject: RE: VLF: QRM? Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_041D_01CF0317.77229540" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=HTML_60_70,HTML_MESSAGE, SUBJ_ALL_CAPS autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 1778 This is a multipart message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_041D_01CF0317.77229540 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thank You Stefan, =20 I=92ve opened a window centered on 11904.76190; this will be very = helpful, much appreciated. =20 Thank you also for the confirmation of QRM. =20 73, Jim AA5BW =20 From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Stefan = Sch=E4fer Sent: Friday, December 27, 2013 2:51 PM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: VLF: QRM? =20 Hi Jim,=20 Am 27.12.2013 19:30, schrieb hvanesce:=20 =20 [...] but I do not know the offset of my sound card clock; my sound card clock and my low-accuracy reference clock differ by 0.3Hz (+/- 1mHz over short and long time intervals), so until install an accurate clock I can only guess that my clock offset could be +/-1Hz or so. Accordingly the center frequency of the signal shown here could be +/- 1Hz or so from = the indicated 8972.81 This question can be answered by tracking the signal on 11904.76190 Hz = which came back, today 14:30 UTC. Is it most likely that the signal in the attached is QRM? R, CFM.=20 73, Stefan/DK7FC ------=_NextPart_000_041D_01CF0317.77229540 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Thank You = Stefan,

 

I’ve opened a = window centered on 11904.76190; this will be very helpful, much = appreciated.

 

Thank you also for the = confirmation of QRM.

 

73,=A0 Jim = AA5BW

 

From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org = [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Stefan = Sch=E4fer
Sent: Friday, December 27, 2013 2:51 = PM
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: Re: = VLF: QRM?

 

Hi Jim, =

Am 27.12.2013 19:30, schrieb hvanesce:

 

[...] = but I do not know the offset of my sound card clock; my sound card clock = and my low-accuracy reference clock differ by 0.3Hz (+/- 1mHz over short = and long time intervals), so until install an accurate clock I can only = guess that my clock offset could be +/-1Hz or so. Accordingly the center = frequency of the signal shown here could be +/- 1Hz or so from the = indicated 8972.81

This = question can be answered by tracking the signal on 11904.76190 Hz which = came back, today 14:30 UTC.

Is it most likely that the signal in the attached is = QRM?

R, CFM. =

73, Stefan/DK7FC

------=_NextPart_000_041D_01CF0317.77229540--