Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11090 invoked from network); 4 Dec 2002 19:37:11 -0000 Received: from warrior.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.227) by mailstore with SMTP; 4 Dec 2002 19:37:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 47 invoked from network); 4 Dec 2002 19:37:00 -0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by warrior.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 4 Dec 2002 19:37:00 -0000 X-SQ: A Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.10) id 18JfJc-0005RI-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Wed, 04 Dec 2002 19:36:12 +0000 Received: from [203.109.254.41] (helo=grunt1.ihug.co.nz) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 18JfJb-0005R5-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 04 Dec 2002 19:36:12 +0000 Received: from p57-max10.chc.ihug.co.nz (athlon) [203.173.226.57] by grunt1.ihug.co.nz with smtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18JfJP-0003rr-00; Thu, 05 Dec 2002 08:36:00 +1300 Message-ID: <036201c29bcc$641d4a30$0101a8c0@athlon> From: "Dave Brown" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2002 08:35:59 +1300 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Subject: LF: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: ADSL EMC with LF operation? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.3 required=5.0tests=QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01, USER_AGENT_OEversion=2.42 Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group ----- Original Message ----- From: "John W Gould" snip (only BT here in > the UK offers "engineer assisted" as they own the "local loop"). But they don't own the house wiring, do they? Any good reason why you cannot install an 'engineer assisted' wiring arrangement yourself, John? Here in ZL the 'engineer assisted' variation is one option- the other being DIY-however and whatever you want-any and all resulting problems with either service being yours to deal to as well! Naturally the recommended method is to replicate the 'engineer assisted' installation but not all bother. Just before I left Telecom NZ a month or two ago I had been carrying out extensive testing into the vulnerability or otherwise of ADSL- believe me, it is VERY robust, especially downstream. I expect your main problem at 136 kHz would be related to the susceptibility of the ADSL modem in the general EMC sense, rather than any ADSL specific issues. 73 Dave ZL3FJ