Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.96.198 with SMTP id du6csp312332igb; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 14:23:32 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.194.1.139 with SMTP id 11mr15285190wjm.33.1384381411076; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 14:23:31 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id cs3si14945659wjb.28.2013.11.13.14.23.30 for ; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 14:23:31 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1VgiLk-0002ti-14 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 21:51:48 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1VgiLj-0002tZ-K2 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 21:51:47 +0000 Received: from smtpout4.wanadoo.co.uk ([80.12.242.68] helo=smtpout.wanadoo.co.uk) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1VgiLh-0008Em-I5 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 21:51:46 +0000 Received: from AGB ([2.31.68.209]) by mwinf5d57 with ME id p9rj1m00a4WuAiA039rlq1; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 22:51:45 +0100 Message-ID: <0349530567D64A5D9E7E3C238BE7E583@AGB> From: "Graham" To: References: <8040b.22ec495f.3fafcf75@aol.com> <527E7A16.2000007@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <527E925C.30502@tiscali.co.uk> <527E94D0.2000609@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <527FEB87.5060606@broadpark.no> <527FEDA0.7070403@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <527FEFB2.2060300@broadpark.no> <527FF551.4040708@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <5283DEA0.6070900@broadpark.no> In-Reply-To: <5283DEA0.6070900@broadpark.no> Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 21:51:43 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416 X-Spam-Score: 0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Why would anyone want to send am/fec on the SA beacon qrg ? , it was S 9 this evening , still in daylight with something like 1000 Hz double side band full carrier modulation , which makes these things 2K wide ? I don't think operating inside the side band - carrier space is acceptable ? [...] Content analysis details: (0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.12.242.68 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.2 STOX_REPLY_TYPE STOX_REPLY_TYPE 0.5 URI_NOVOWEL URI: URI hostname has long non-vowel sequence X-Scan-Signature: 11963a33d604c33786d8f1de94ce267f Subject: Re: LF: NAVTEX 474.5 kHz Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.4 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME, UPPERCASE_25_50 autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 2455 Why would anyone want to send am/fec on the SA beacon qrg ? , it was S 9 this evening , still in daylight with something like 1000 Hz double side band full carrier modulation , which makes these things 2K wide ? I don't think operating inside the side band - carrier space is acceptable ? G, -------------------------------------------------- From: "Steinar Aanesland" Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2013 8:18 PM To: Subject: Re: LF: NAVTEX 474.5 kHz > > Hi Stefan > > When are you going to test NAVTEX (amtor/fec) again ? > > I have been using multipsk for decoding with an average score. It could > interesting to see if my "SCS PTC-IIusb" box is doing a better job. > > LA5VNA Steinar > > > > > > > On 10.11.2013 22:06, Stefan Schäfer wrote: >> Hello Steinar, >> >> Oh, looks like QSB :-) >> I've added you to the list. 9 stations so far! >> >> 73, Stefan >> >> Am 10.11.2013 21:42, schrieb Steinar Aanesland: >>> Stefan, >>> >>> My report :) >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> RADIO STATION: >>> CALL: DK7FC DK7FC DK7FC >>> OPERATOR: STEFAN STEFAN STEFAN >>> QTH: HEIDELBERG HEIDELBERG HEIDELBERG >>> LOCATOR: JN49IK JN49IK JN49IK >>> ANTENNA: INV-L D 0C LONG >>> TX: HOMEMADE CLASS-A 50W/100 >>> 2 13.8V >>> >>> REPORTS WELCOME VIA LF REFEECTOR (BLACKSHEEP.ORG) >>> OR 630M MAND D CLUSTSR >>> OR EMAIL TO: DK7FC(A)DARCBMDE >>> FURTHER INFORMATIONS: HTTP://WWWWMQRZ.COM/DB/XK7FC >>> >>> TNX FOR R CEPTION REPORTS TO: >>> F5WK, DG3LV, F4DTL, F6ACU, F1TAY, G4WGT, G6AVK, DL7ET, >>> >>> 73 73 73 73 73 >>> >>> -------- >>> >>> >>> >>> I am using multipsk. It seems that you are using 200hz shift >>> >>> >>> S LA5VNA >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On 10.11.2013 21:33, Stefan Schäfer wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Steinar, >>>> >>>> Now it is 477.5 center frequency. >>>> >>>> 73, Stefan >>>> >>>> Am 10.11.2013 21:24, schrieb Steinar Aanesland: >>>> >>>>> Stefan >>>>> >>>>> It 474.5 kHz a "center frequency" or dial usb? >>>>> >>>>> La5vna S >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> > > > >