Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com
Received: by 10.50.237.98 with SMTP id vb2csp104664igc;
        Sat, 8 Mar 2014 04:36:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.180.72.195 with SMTP id f3mr1381284wiv.61.1394282213877;
        Sat, 08 Mar 2014 04:36:53 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTP id lx7si13243160wjb.39.2014.03.08.04.36.53
        for <daveyxm@virginmedia.com>;
        Sat, 08 Mar 2014 04:36:53 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
       spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org;
       dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@comcast.net
Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14)
	id 1WMFn6-0003G9-M7
	for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 08 Mar 2014 11:51:44 +0000
Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net)
	by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14)
	id 1WMFn6-0003G0-48
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 08 Mar 2014 11:51:44 +0000
Received: from qmta13.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.27.243])
	by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.82)
	(envelope-from <hvanesce@comcast.net>)
	id 1WMFn3-0004lh-Ql
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 08 Mar 2014 11:51:43 +0000
Received: from omta04.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.35])
	by qmta13.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast
	id azqU1n0010lTkoCADzrftY; Sat, 08 Mar 2014 11:51:39 +0000
Received: from Owner ([166.137.182.142])
	by omta04.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast
	id azrJ1n00434kqxi8QzrQou; Sat, 08 Mar 2014 11:51:34 +0000
X-DKIM-Result: Domain=comcast.net Result=Signature OK
From: "hvanesce" <hvanesce@comcast.net>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
References: <BLU180-W3599B1565E284475140856AC880@phx.gbl> <2662DF5AA7FA416CBB09CDB90BBFF7B1@White> <016101cf39df$4f4c89a0$ede59ce0$@comcast.net>,<FA723BF050144798AD076EB0C9190D21@White> <BLU180-W432C6E6C028F0DD53D7014AC8B0@phx.gbl> <01dc01cf3a3f$86997bb0$93cc7310$@comcast.net>,<A47BA5540C3B42619C724008CDF3A0ED@White> <BLU180-W23A00B5028E9D0DEEF6B3AC8B0@phx.gbl> <2FC5CAB271A6437CB35A5B100185CEDA@White> <025101cf3a52$e0925750$a1b705f0$@comcast.net> <7DB9DD5669FC4C648838510DCAC08AFB@White> <531A506E.9040103@abelian.org> <531A5C19.9060209@abelian.org> <02ba01cf3aa3$debaad50$9c3007f0$@comcast.net> <531AF126.2060600@abelian.org>
In-Reply-To: <531AF126.2060600@abelian.org>
Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2014 04:51:15 -0700
Message-ID: <02cd01cf3ac4$bfbcdba0$3f3692e0$@comcast.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQFwHFQtNP1cuGk4XhlGVCAC9znl2gG7rsFSAR0lnQgBd+LZewJLh/X8Ab8nTT4C/5bZTAGUATieAUzcPSMBZtiUawDaWzx3AoAxwksBwVpScwI72uscAimolEeazCP9oA==
Content-Language: en-us
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net;
	s=q20121106; t=1394279499;
	bh=XSe/+3OXmyY+wsprqrVkL3tO2xxJXpodqZOaGEUCcE0=;
	h=Received:Received:From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:
	 Content-Type;
	b=jHgMkn1vCWkt6LrPBuiwjFOMqO0wSSeoFQT70nb7zGU9ZyHs9Rk8Y0Ge4ezQw4a7b
	 ZT5AKarQWXR+r6wpwq+V6ZfGd4qX0TfUFfMohtbZsR4iAFX3Vk7jydsZv5cnIjQmSP
	 5uSm4VnxRA3kI3VRGiytAssv0dMb5MzuViTkYNdT5cOyFwooHVlr6hJ/N1J6zpHMuP
	 RiNPa9N9H1pAxy8CUyNPTDGNAkotyjR2UK+gEixf76oqS3DEGTBy3ci1iTUv9XYYou
	 AqhrLoCuf0KZSuKJ9v9TNZv42Hzjc/y5J+qkuNeljf3AdomW7L7DuqPBMGP4LhAN2X
	 HUOdRa9DWI3sA==
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has
 identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
 has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 Content preview:  Paul, Thanks; as always, great data and analysis. After reviewing
    the six (including 1 previous) plots, I scrolled back and forth through them;
    in sequence they make a compelling picture. [...] 
 Content analysis details:   (0.0 points, 5.0 required)
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE     RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no
                             trust
                             [76.96.27.243 listed in list.dnswl.org]
  0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM          Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
                             (hvanesce[at]comcast.net)
 -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD      Envelope sender domain matches handover relay
                             domain
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
  0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID         DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid
X-Scan-Signature: b1e5ebccbad86c8ca1fd46d24f0285de
Subject: RE: LF: Daytime 29.499 kHz
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false

Paul,

Thanks; as always, great data and analysis. 

After reviewing the six (including 1 previous) plots, I scrolled back and
forth through them; in sequence they make a compelling picture.

The prognosis for 29 kHz activity is quite interesting; I'm looking forward
to bringing equipment online. At the moment I am surrounded by 29 kHz TX and
RX equipment that almost works.

73,   Jim AA5BW 

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
[mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Paul Nicholson
Sent: Saturday, March 8, 2014 3:30 AM
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: Re: LF: Daytime 29.499 kHz

Yes Jim the 'z' scale is proportional to amplitude (flux density), not
power.

I completely agree with your interpretation of the plot -

  - The nighttime window doesn't quite close and even
    in high summer we still have couple of useful hours.

  - In compensation for the short night, the daytime propagation
    improves: better and longer, and by July, midday levels
    are about 6dB below the March nighttime.

We should consider 'midday' to be relative to the center of the path.

For comparison, NAA for two more years

  http://abelian.org/vlf/tmp/naa_2012a.png
  http://abelian.org/vlf/tmp/naa_2011a.png

Looks pretty repeatable year to year.

As Alan mentioned, the midday 'dome' is a feature of most long
range diurnals.   For example, NAU (Aguada) at 40.8 kHz for
2012 and 2013

  http://abelian.org/vlf/tmp/nau_2012a.png
  http://abelian.org/vlf/tmp/nau_2013a.png

Path length to NAU is 6740km, NAA is 4672km.

Going eastwards, TBB (Bafa, Turkey) on 26.7 kHz range 2883km

  http://abelian.org/vlf/tmp/tbb_2013a.png

shows that it's not just an east-to-west feature.

During flares, the signal is always enhanced which confirms that the dome
improves with ionisation.

The midday dome is essentially D-layer propagation.  D-layer is formed by
solar radiation (mostly nitric oxide ionised by Lyman
alpha) with a reflection height of around 70km.   At night this
layer dissipates and reflection occurs from the E-layer at
95 km or thereabouts.  Away from midday we have a mixture of the two, with
E-layer reflections being attenuated by passage through a partially formed
D-layer.

The D layer is a good reflector when fully formed but being lower, more hops
are required to cover a path.
--
Paul Nicholson
--