Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.237.98 with SMTP id vb2csp570843igc; Thu, 26 Dec 2013 15:19:03 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.194.63.228 with SMTP id j4mr32258206wjs.34.1388099943371; Thu, 26 Dec 2013 15:19:03 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id lp10si12042302wjb.12.2013.12.26.15.19.02 for ; Thu, 26 Dec 2013 15:19:03 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@comcast.net Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1VwK5I-0002zJ-C2 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 26 Dec 2013 23:11:20 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1VwK5H-0002zA-Ib for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 26 Dec 2013 23:11:19 +0000 Received: from qmta02.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.24]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1VwK5E-0008D3-M9 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 26 Dec 2013 23:11:18 +0000 Received: from omta09.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.20]) by qmta02.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 6PA21n0020S2fkCA2PBEW8; Thu, 26 Dec 2013 23:11:14 +0000 Received: from Owner ([166.137.182.216]) by omta09.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 6PAs1n00r4gYbxS8VPAyXS; Thu, 26 Dec 2013 23:11:09 +0000 From: "hvanesce" To: References: In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2013 16:10:50 -0700 Message-ID: <02ca01cf028f$c157cf50$44076df0$@comcast.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQGG6zKwfArbcCehO8c1EjpWah3feJr3OcMQ Content-Language: en-us DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20121106; t=1388099474; bh=d8sZetzU2AR6rWPOcS7bcY+b1w3RdNVVuHoWmwMyFI4=; h=Received:Received:From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version: Content-Type; b=q5i5qc/piIMj0WFHhPt+D14xKFGc3Hix37ngJPvj9VVsK4lHZK83H2Zjzg/JSYpsP WMx1ge4RS//qNeJxM6SQF3W6JsaBLA5F3CvJPmMvqbOGsTvMzitVVO2e6rok8e2cRI v6x93fDR61607IhdChdxmBW7MkdThxCKIeHWVZbNkmwTbun7z/1TPV1hhBr9dhNFbe G3NTUAhNEL7WUJ06HyypDuBmIkMFkUwqazarHp9Os4VSy4Z0h2mex0er6yyfsUslGN z3tIW1RDHnUfDEOOz+/FIg45aaqGHH95+hp4tNzkyohNRojtfi0VG0wBzXwvtyccev +qrDpJckXovcw== X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Uwe, Thank you for the great signals! Hoping to capture them in Virginia or Arizona sometime soon. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.5 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [76.96.30.24 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (hvanesce[at]comcast.net) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.6 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: fcf77e2759cb043d8839e008dc214d5a Subject: RE: Re: VLF: 8969.99 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_02CB_01CF0255.14F9E1B0" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=HTML_60_70,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 1766 This is a multipart message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_02CB_01CF0255.14F9E1B0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Uwe, Thank you for the great signals! Hoping to capture them in Virginia or Arizona sometime soon. Would 500W into a 300m antenna imply approximately 10mW < ERP < 50mW after coil losses, at 9kHz? Does your antenna orientation and elevation angle vary? (my maximum integration time is dependent on phase rate of change which is dependent on the antenna angle, even if the antenna angle is constant) I enjoyed seeing the strong signals earlier this week on DK7FC, PA1SDB and other grabbers, thanks! 73, Jim AA5BW From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of uwe-jannsen@kabelmail.de Sent: Thursday, December 26, 2013 2:53 PM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: Re: VLF: 8969.99 Hi Stefan and Eddy, thanks for the reports. the equipment here is the same as ever (500W output into 300m aerial wire). Markus asked for some OPERA OP4H tests. We have to schedule that test. GL Uwe/dj8wx as Tom dj8CAT. _____ Von: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Gesendet: 26.12.2013 13:55 An: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Betreff: Re: VLF: 8969.99 _____ Hi Uwe, Tom, VLF, Best signal ever from Tom, capture attached. Is it due to the propagation or did it improve your signal? What about some tests in OPDS32 or maybe JT9-30? Unfortunately there is permanent rain here so i have to wait some days longer. 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 26.12.2013 10:58, schrieb g3zjo: Hi All Yes, yesterday was quieter on 8.9KHz with less catastrophic noise pulses. This meant that although Uwe's signal was less strong than during other tests I was in the catchment area. The low signal level means there are breaks in the line here in both 424uH and 47uHz FFT but I was able to catch some nice periods when the signal in 47uHz was10dB above the noise peaks. I can categorically confirm reception. Thanks Uwe and (Tom DL8CAT) for the signal. 73 Eddie G3ZJO http://www.g3zjo.talktalk.net/vlfgrabber.htm ------=_NextPart_000_02CB_01CF0255.14F9E1B0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Uwe,

 

Thank you for the great signals!

 

Hoping to capture them in Virginia or Arizona sometime = soon.

 

Would 500W into a 300m antenna imply approximately 10mW < ERP < = 50mW after coil losses, at 9kHz?

 

Does your antenna orientation and elevation angle vary? (my maximum = integration time is dependent on phase rate of change which is dependent = on the antenna angle, even if the antenna angle is = constant)

 

I enjoyed seeing the strong signals earlier this week on DK7FC, = PA1SDB and other grabbers, thanks!

 

73,  Jim AA5BW

 

 

 

From:= = owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org = [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of = uwe-jannsen@kabelmail.de
Sent: Thursday, December 26, 2013 = 2:53 PM
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: = Re: Re: VLF: 8969.99

 

Hi Stefan = and Eddy,

thanks for the reports. the equipment here is the same = as ever (500W output into 300m aerial wire).
Markus asked for some = OPERA OP4H tests. We have to schedule that test.

GL =

Uwe/dj8wx as = Tom dj8CAT.

 

Von: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=
Gesendet: 26.12.2013 13:55
An: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=
Betreff: Re: VLF: 8969.99


Hi Uwe, = Tom, VLF,

Best signal ever from Tom, capture attached. Is it due = to the propagation or did it improve your signal?
What about some = tests in OPDS32 or maybe JT9-30? Unfortunately there is permanent rain = here so i have to wait some days longer.

73, = Stefan/DK7FC

Am 26.12.2013 10:58, schrieb g3zjo: =

Hi = All

Yes, yesterday was quieter on 8.9KHz with less catastrophic = noise pulses. This meant that although Uwe's signal was less strong than = during other tests I was in the catchment = area. The low signal level means there are breaks in the line here in = both 424uH and 47uHz FFT but I was able to catch some = nice periods when the signal in 47uHz was10dB above the noise peaks. I = can categorically = confirm reception.

Thanks Uwe and (Tom DL8CAT) for the = signal.

73 Eddie G3ZJO
http://www.g3zjo.ta= lktalk.net/vlfgrabber.htm

------=_NextPart_000_02CB_01CF0255.14F9E1B0--