Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-ma04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 9BA123800008C; Mon, 28 May 2012 18:39:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SZ8a5-0000ac-Uw for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 28 May 2012 23:38:29 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SZ8a5-0000aT-8Y for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 28 May 2012 23:38:29 +0100 Received: from nm16-vm0.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com ([77.238.189.192]) by relay1.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SZ8a2-0006ux-DO for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 28 May 2012 23:38:28 +0100 Received: from [77.238.189.50] by nm16.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 28 May 2012 22:38:24 -0000 Received: from [212.82.108.225] by tm3.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 28 May 2012 22:38:24 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1002.bt.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 28 May 2012 22:38:24 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 120316.37981.bm@omp1002.bt.mail.ird.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 89583 invoked from network); 28 May 2012 22:38:23 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btinternet.com; h=DKIM-Signature:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-Antivirus:X-Antivirus-Status; b=bICCoozquPoYy0h79xCJlRwPXlkleEwyD45zjcw5QLtaCyC1OH8kr+KncQQ2cehh2e4dOYcErhr1zQ8a8bd/UgF+liEa4PEDPywbJGTCmMtDKvjsotGpJSF6oXTfFOBh1uIumH8LcESgmVKa5EYimcpptfwce4w3EMRb9R0F+Oc= ; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=s1024; t=1338244703; bh=53K+owId3guLhUOqhUcA/87ryu1g4IioA4HurKRLTmM=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-Antivirus:X-Antivirus-Status; b=gXM39yYCaoLET0mmqccq1rMjMVBiGFoGh48Y47eUciC5fnZUN0fa1lahIRAJcwp36QehLA+Gnmjj8hDRTV3oSf4dhuy0aY6CLYoVEChVEiu5t5rkMtTbUkrf302G8qEhmfzaASCb1cyR5aSk+mfcPOzUuR04c5liAgdnc/0TWgk= X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: rVBqH04VM1kgb79ewAPUa9pSeGqJHfHLB.md_NLI8QjfeAn BbXX2mJm2u88daanmWEpcgGaCOd_BLaGGr32eFphOvWJ1AHmXIMDDqoKQgI6 tyMdOoIREoVQKSkH5cKmbBbp5kHeG1CPrXmaKsl3vkyK1G2QdA.QQEBBB.r9 iqFLu39ENa_qpP68cuo2eWSZcVw.7X.vjjPhmYxWQD12IgHMHaMqHKkVLaHL tNs0u2M.QgP_7tweYZCH3kl7cmQIDOnaBpUK_yWGrYD9aCwne6nNisxGe78U IGHFEZc_OtB1q_LwNpOklevVPzYqoTKPex27ERCxhbOKCqZcI_kbkbtaz4Dw wJJgCtJ5BXkmANvOwYDhZMddA.is9PRd_ewIUUKIvuXE.NIkPXZQV8NbazYG W0KQcgErpBbQ36E0EavKbQYRPCHvNWfQpyGO6Olw.9i4Y1xM1QrAQe6xL.3r oHTvJp5Qhsd5Y7oK1BKcoXyM1AZlR5EyufEf6tVsYUyz6PWzvpHMeb1ZjeEY G0fVLtOMAYfaZ0J6G5RrogFFsfmGpip5C7U8acjMkP2yUuHhIFrjnM4o4mLH mntDRtsGfj36b9739pOh5O8rainTfnNneL1qfxhtf5UcjO4Im7eZN X-Yahoo-SMTP: fpz.2VeswBBs59bVshRPmMN51lcO2lgFRIvE4XTqE8dRwOxd70E- Received: from lark (alan.melia@109.155.63.143 with login) by smtp817.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 28 May 2012 15:38:23 -0700 PDT Message-ID: <02a401cd557e$e2d0fe00$4001a8c0@lark> From: "Alan Melia" To: References: <4FC39CF3.7020701@legal-medicine.de> <1338226811.63172.YahooMailNeo@web171601.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> <016501cd3d01$453debc0$4001a8c0@lark> <1338242279.43694.YahooMailNeo@web171602.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 23:39:29 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.2001 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.2001 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 120528-0, 28/05/2012), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Score: 1.4 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi pete another idea is to use the twisted pai as balanced and use a centre tapped transformer. Most of these troubles are caused by common mode signal due to unbalance......the ol' "holes an' poles boys" been dealing wuth that for years. :-)) [...] Content analysis details: (1.4 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [77.238.189.192 listed in list.dnswl.org] 1.4 DATE_IN_FUTURE_96_Q Date: is 4 days to 4 months after Received: date 0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY Informational: message has unparseable relay lines 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: da9a90c67b7e22f6718c156d8d99c1a4 Subject: Re: LF: VLF/LF-Preamp Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.4 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_FUTURE_96_XX autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:444708256:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-m403.2 ; domain : btinternet.com DKIM : pass x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d600c4fc3fead2485 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hi pete another idea is to use the twisted pai as balanced and use a centre tapped transformer. Most of these troubles are caused by common mode signal due to unbalance......the ol' "holes an' poles boys" been dealing wuth that for years. :-)) It very frustrating when things dont work due to pickup and such like , but its amazing what you can achieve beavering away with some quite old technology. If you want to put power down the twisted pair. If you use center tapped transformers you can feed power to the centre tap and the shield, the telephone boys call it phantom power feed I think. Can't do that with glass-fibre :-)) Alan ----- Original Message ----- From: "M0FMT" To: Sent: Monday, May 28, 2012 10:57 PM Subject: Re: LF: VLF/LF-Preamp Sounds good Alan. I don't think I have anything to add. I hope Peter3LP sorts his problems using a twisted pair DC feed through a (modified Coax cable , I like that idea) screen. Oh and I don't like to spend money either so good advice. Working at audio (8Kc/s Dreamers - 20kc/s SAQ / Mil) with an active antenna I could see there may be an issue with the long power feed to the amplifier picking up EMC which may be getting through to the RX (soundcard). The screen to conductor capacity varing owing to screening sheath to conductor spacing altering because of applied cyclic mechanical force did not seem an unlikely cause of microphony. Basically a very long capacitive microphone. However if no mechanical force (air born pressure wave or otherwise) is applied then no microphony should occur. So your explaination is the likely one..... probably. 73 es GL Pete M0FMT IO91UX ________________________________ From: Alan Melia To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Sent: Monday, 28 May 2012, 19:18 Subject: Re: LF: VLF/LF-Preamp Hi Peter just a quick butt-in...... dont waste money on noiseless microphone cable! :-)) This is prevent noise on low-level audio signal WHEN THE CABLE IS FLEXED AND TWISTED. It has no advantage is the cable is not moved. There what is called a "tribo-electric effect in cable which is akin to rubbing a plastic rod (or an amber rod if you are old or rich enough :-)) ) which a cats pelt. (or possibly silk) The flexing of the coax (or STP) generates a static charge which varies with movement so generates an audio noise/crackle. Use a tightly twisted pair like you suggested and you can actually pull the centre insulator out of old UR67 or RG213 and pull the twisted pair though that. Cheaper than solid plumbing ! I was first shown that by telephone engineers :-)) Alan G3NYK ----- Original Message ----- From: "M0FMT" To: Sent: Monday, May 28, 2012 6:40 PM Subject: Re: LF: VLF/LF-Preamp Hi Peter If you are talking about the dc supply cable being both an electromagnetic antenna but also a microphone then I am sure you already know that A/ using a twisted balanced arrangement may cut the first, and B/ spending a load of cash on a specialist microphone cable by say ATM may cut the second http://www.mtraudio.com/atmcables.htm ............. They say " The secret of noiseless microphone cable is to combat both electromagnetic interference and mechanical vibration (microphony). ATM uses a twist technique and high grade lapp shield to reject electro-magnetic interference. The outer jacket material is chosen for resilience and pliability but also has vibration absorbing properties. Internal cotton fillers further reduce microphony. These features combine to give ATM accurate, noise free signal path performance." But a more practical approach may be to twist your own wire in a hand drill (like I do) and feed it through a thin copper pumbing tube then filling the whole thing with that sealing expanding foam (which I don't do). It may work, never tried it myself. Also look at the screen grounding, have the far end un-grounded or visa versa. Thinking about it some more I use microphone cable for my Rig to PC connections stolen from my sons Guitar Kit Its very thick and squashy. That never gives any RF or Microphony issues but that may be just luck. Suggest you migrate to the Yahoo RSGB LF site for a wider discussion group there are more informed people there than me. Any way good luck and let us know how you get on, this cannot be a new issue I am sure. 73 es GL Pete M0FMT IO91UX ________________________________ From: pws To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" Sent: Monday, 28 May 2012, 16:42 Subject: LF: VLF/LF-Preamp Hi, After all those meta-discussions here's a more serious problem: I'm playing around with a new e-field probe based on the INA111. http://www.ti.com/product/ina111 Schematic: http://www.df3lp.de/misc/rx/INA111_preamp.png It's working fine and the local interferences are lower compared to my old non-balanced design running here on balcony. That was the goal. Amplification is quite enough to drive a M-Audio audiophile 192 soundcard. There's a second transformer (1:4) at the af-inputs. The coupling capacitance of those transformers are below 10pF each. I'm using the shields of a thin double coaxial line for bringing up the supply voltage. The voltage splitter is located at the far end inside the small amplifier box. The problem is that I'm observing to a lot of interferences/microphonics "from behind" when touching the battery located inside the house. ??? Peter, df3lp