Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-ma06.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 4EC7638000088; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 12:25:42 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TljrC-0005J8-A3 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 17:24:30 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TljrB-0005Iz-Hq for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 17:24:29 +0000 Received: from smtpout1.wanadoo.co.uk ([80.12.242.29] helo=smtpout.wanadoo.co.uk) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1Tljr9-00083A-Pw for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 17:24:28 +0000 Received: from AGB ([2.26.28.206]) by mwinf5d01 with ME id dtQ71k0064Sp19N03tQ78t; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 18:24:07 +0100 Message-ID: <02DBBB3002434DB3B3FA65844208CF61@AGB> From: "Graham" To: References: <1TlisQ-0d4JpA0@fwd11.t-online.de> <50D34621.4070805@gmail.com> <598519308-1356023657-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-1327427466-@b27.c4.bise7.blackberry> In-Reply-To: <598519308-1356023657-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-1327427466-@b27.c4.bise7.blackberry> Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 17:24:07 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416 X-Spam-Score: 1.8 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Not the first time , there was a time when G8 calls could use HF , till the next issue of the London Gazette was published .. unfortunately electronic comm's are slightly faster these days G,.. From: Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 5:14 PM To: Subject: Re: LF: G3KEV and DK7FC in qso heard in JN68GN [...] Content analysis details: (1.8 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.12.242.29 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.2 STOX_REPLY_TYPE STOX_REPLY_TYPE 1.5 TVD_FINGER_02 TVD_FINGER_02 X-Scan-Signature: 9d01e9df836df8dd3868645661e1c1f7 Subject: Re: LF: G3KEV and DK7FC in qso heard in JN68GN Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="Windows-1252"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d600e50d34a1531a4 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Not the first time , there was a time when G8 calls could use HF , till the next issue of the London Gazette was published .. unfortunately electronic comm's are slightly faster these days G,.. -------------------------------------------------- From: Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 5:14 PM To: Subject: Re: LF: G3KEV and DK7FC in qso heard in JN68GN > And perhaps if a fuss hadn't been made it may not have been noted? > Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device > > -----Original Message----- > From: John Pumford-Green > Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 17:08:49 > To: > Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Subject: Re: LF: G3KEV and DK7FC in qso heard in JN68GN > > On 20/12/2012 16:21, hajo.brandt.dj1zb@t-online.de wrote: >> Dear all, >> >> beginning about 16.00 UTC I heard G3KEV and DK7FC in QSO on 472 kHz > > > Mal and the other UK early adopters better make good use of 472 tonight: > > this is a cut/paste from the 5MHz group from John Gould: > > ============================= > > Apologies for any confusion. > > Ofcom have been busy working on this, particularly in the past few days, > and we had to get the on-line issuing started prior to our HQ web master > starting Christmas leave. From the inside it has been extremely busy to > get this sorted out in time. > > Ofcom provide basic information on the NoV at > > http://licensing.ofcom.org.uk/radiocommunication-licences/amateur-radio/full-licence-jan-2013/ > > The new NoVs (for 472 kHz and 5 MHz) are only effective from 1st > January. There was a glitch on the web server that meant that the first > few issued had an error, which we will be considering how to correct > tomorrow. > > > =================================== > > > Looks like the erroneously dated NoVs (mine included) will be rescinded > tomorrow. > > A one-night only opportunity to open your Xmas presents early! > > John > GM4SLV > > >