X-GM-THRID: 1196684404245296047
X-Gmail-Labels: rsgb lf
X-Gmail-Received: d000153a48c0defe01a53d2a0bc46e386d9cbf13
Delivered-To: daveyxm@gmail.com
Received: by 10.54.71.12 with SMTP id t12cs11519wra;
        Thu, 2 Mar 2006 09:59:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.67.10.16 with SMTP id n16mr553551ugi;
        Thu, 02 Mar 2006 09:59:42 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20])
        by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id m1si1776092ugc.2006.03.02.09.59.42;
        Thu, 02 Mar 2006 09:59:42 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: neutral (gmail.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org)
Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14)
	id 1FEs3M-0005rz-Jm
	for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 02 Mar 2006 17:57:28 +0000
Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net)
	by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14)
	id 1FEs3M-0005rq-7E
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 02 Mar 2006 17:57:28 +0000
Received: from smtp801.mail.ukl.yahoo.com ([217.12.12.138])
	by relay1.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.51)
	id 1FEtXt-0008SF-95
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 02 Mar 2006 19:33:21 +0000
Received: (qmail 56927 invoked from network); 2 Mar 2006 17:57:11 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO LAPTOP) (peter.martinez@btinternet.com@86.135.51.89 with login)
  by smtp801.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 2 Mar 2006 17:57:11 -0000
Message-ID: <029801c63e22$bb20b190$0300a8c0@LAPTOP>
From: "Peter Martinez" <peter.martinez@btinternet.com>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
References: <PAEFLMFGBDKKCONLMLBIKEOMCFAA.ganymede444@btopenworld.com> <01cd01c63d73$69bc4f80$0300a8c0@LAPTOP> <4407287F.8000306@freenet.de>
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 17:57:11 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180
X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--)
X-Spam-Report: autolearn=ham,BAYES_00=-2.599
Subject: Re: LF: LORAN spurious emission levels
Content-Type: text/plain;
	format=flowed;
	charset="iso-8859-1";
	reply-type=response
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Status: O
X-Status: 
X-Keywords:                  
X-UID: 6241

Wolf:

That would be another way to get a calibration, so long as we also knew the 
emrp of DCF39. If you are close enough to receive surface wave from DCF39 
and surface wave from Sylt, then a ratio of the DCF39 carrier level to the 
level of a typical Sylt LORAN line (at midday) could be used to give the 
emrp of the LORAN line. WE can estimate the path loss from the distance 
within a few dB so long as the both paths are over similar type of ground.

But Dave G0MRF also sent me a nice spreadsheet of some measurements which 
were made at Rugby when the LORAN transmitter was installed. This is a 
record of the classic USCG measurement to confirm that only 1% of the energy 
is outside 90-110kHz. This spreadsheet seems to be a chart of the readings 
of a spectrum analyser which is changed in 2kHz steps between 70 and 130kHz, 
measuring the levels in a narrow bandwidth (<2kHz?) from an antenna-current 
monitoring point. From this I can apply an F-squared factor to calculate the 
power spectral density. I have to guess the shape of the curve from 130kHz 
to 136kHz.

This tells me (if I did it right) that the spectral density at 136kHz is 
about 47.5dB down on the spectral density at 100kHz. The problem now is that 
I don't know how to convert this to the mean level of a single spectral 
line - I need to know the relationship between the published power of the 
transmitter (presumably the peak pulse emrp) and the spectral density (mean 
power/kHz) at 100kHz.

Anyone have any ideas?  Maybe this can be measured off-air, or we can figure 
it out from published info.

73
Peter G3PLX