Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15670 invoked from network); 2 Jul 2001 10:56:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO warrior-inbound.servers.plus.net) (212.159.14.227) by excalibur.plus.net with SMTP; 2 Jul 2001 10:56:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 24077 invoked from network); 2 Jul 2001 10:55:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by warrior with SMTP; 2 Jul 2001 10:55:33 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.16 #2) id 15H1Fm-0002WF-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Mon, 02 Jul 2001 11:48:30 +0100 Received: from smtp.im.cz ([195.39.10.4] helo=email.seznam.cz) by post.thorcom.com with smtp (Exim 3.16 #2) id 15H1Fk-0002W2-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 02 Jul 2001 11:48:29 +0100 Received: (qmail 29238 invoked from network); 2 Jul 2001 10:46:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO p) (195.47.69.2) by smtp.im.cz with SMTP; 2 Jul 2001 10:46:51 -0000 Message-ID: <024501c102e3$dbd3b100$1601a8c0@maly.cz.gmc.net> From: "Petr Maly \(Seznam\)" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <001901c102c8$93b65780$9f5c01d5@dave> Subject: LF: Re: SAQ Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2001 12:43:40 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2014.211 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: I heard SA6Q in the morning calling cq (cw) on 137.56. They called cq but they didn't give any QRX so it was not clear whether they listen to CW or Visual-CW on 136 kHz band or HF. I called them in both modes in vain. Did anybody worked them on LF? Tranmission on 17.2 kHz was clear 589. 73 Petr OK1FIG ----- Original Message ----- From: Dave Sergeant To: rsgb_lf_group Cc: G4BRA Sent: Monday, July 02, 2001 9:24 AM Subject: LF: SAQ > From Dave G3YMC > > SAQ on 17.2kHz copied 589 both sessions on my 'bit of string' untuned longwire. > Solid copy despite intermittent elecrical QRN at a similar strength (thermostat or > similar). However the signal was many db below GBRs enormous signal. > > John Sexton wrote: > >The message wasn't very interesting: > > I agree. It seems John's transcript was done with his morse copier software rather > than by ear. What fooled me was the proliferation of not normally used puctuation > characters. Perhaps it shows how inappropriate morse is for sending things like web > site addresses, but I was particularly fooled by the + sign (I think) before the FAX > telephone number (+46 for Sweden). Don't think I have ever heard a + on CW before!! > > >Before restarting in the afternoon, I noticed the frequency going up and > >down a bit - problems with the regulator? > > There was noticeable chirp on the signal at all times, especially on dashes. > > SA6Q not heard on 136 but it was probably while I was out in the morning. > > 73s Dave G3YMC > dsergeant@iee.org > dsergeant@btinternet.com > http://www.dsergeant.btinternet.co.uk > > > > > > >