Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-db06.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 999AD38000195; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 13:37:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1U7V6O-0006EJ-It for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 18:06:08 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1U7V6O-0006EA-2i for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 18:06:08 +0000 Received: from out1.ip01ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.237]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1U7V6J-0001Mn-Bj for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 18:06:06 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Aj4FAEtsIlFcF/Zj/2dsb2JhbABEqSADhUKRPoEDF3OCGgUBAQUIAQEDSQIPBBkBAQMFAgEDEQQBAQolFAEEGgYWCAYTCgECAgEBh28DEwi3GAsCiVqMWYF/VBgQgyoDiDGFWYZHgniKJoUVgwc X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,689,1355097600"; d="scan'208,217";a="419592213" Received: from host-92-23-246-99.as13285.net (HELO xphd97xgq27nyf) ([92.23.246.99]) by out1.ip01ir2.opaltelecom.net with SMTP; 18 Feb 2013 18:05:42 +0000 Message-ID: <020701ce0e02$9001bec0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> From: "mal hamilton" To: References: <01c201ce0df6$fca68350$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf><01d001ce0df7$ec018990$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf><3751D15C489E45289657A49A3266CF42@AGB> Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 18:05:40 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: I WOUD MOVE ----- Original Message ----- From: Roger Lapthorn To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Sent: Monday, February 18, 2013 5:25 PM Subject: Re: LF: Re: POOR ANTENNAS Quite so Graham. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_024C2 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_024C2 X-Scan-Signature: 9d611a03c0c7539fa2f53ebf8cdeb3a5 Subject: Re: LF: Re: POOR ANTENNAS Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0204_01CE0E02.8FA98CA0" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d405a51227504472e X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0204_01CE0E02.8FA98CA0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I WOUD MOVE ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Roger Lapthorn=20 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Sent: Monday, February 18, 2013 5:25 PM Subject: Re: LF: Re: POOR ANTENNAS Quite so Graham.=20 Many are plagued by unbelievable noise levels these days. It would be = too much to expect Mal to try to empathise and suggest helpful ways of = mitigating this.=20 I just wonder how Mal would fare living in an urban semi with a 40 = foot garden like mine?=20 73s Roger G3XBM On 18 February 2013 17:01, Graham wrote: May be , may be not Mal The system is reading the s/n at the Rx and not the field = strength ........ depends on the local noise level , rst 159 or = 599 , carrier still S9 , 1=3D qrm 5=3D no qrm=20 From: mal hamilton=20 Sent: Monday, February 18, 2013 4:49 PM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Subject: LF: Re: POOR ANTENNAS Example I am receiving PA3EGO + 2dB another UK stn is showing -22 at a = shorter distance. A difference of 24 dB and this station says he is an Expert!!=20 ----- Original Message -----=20 From: mal hamilton=20 To: rsgb=20 Sent: Monday, February 18, 2013 4:42 PM Subject: LF: POOR ANTENNAS MF One thing the wspr DB shows is how poor some Receivers/Antennas = are comparing like with like approximately same distances from = Transmitter.=20 g3kev --=20 http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/ http://www.g3xbm.co.uk https://sites.google.com/site/sub9khz/ http://qss2.blogspot.com/ http://www.youtube.com/user/g3xbm ------=_NextPart_000_0204_01CE0E02.8FA98CA0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I WOUD MOVE
 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Roger=20 Lapthorn
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2013 = 5:25=20 PM
Subject: Re: LF: Re: POOR = ANTENNAS

Quite so Graham.

Many are plagued by unbelievable = noise=20 levels these days. It would be too much to expect Mal to try to = empathise and=20 suggest helpful ways of mitigating this.

I just wonder how Mal would fare living in an urban semi with a = 40 foot=20 garden like mine?

73s
Roger G3XBM


On 18 February 2013 17:01, Graham <g8fzk@g8fzk.fsnet.co.uk> wrote:
May be , may be not  Mal
 
The system is  reading  the  s/n   at=20 the  Rx   and  not the   field  = strength=20 ........  depends on the  local  noise level = ,  =20 rst   159  or  599  , carrier  = still =20 S9  ,   1=3D qrm     5=3D = no  qrm=20
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2013 4:49 PM
Subject: LF: Re: POOR ANTENNAS

Example
I am receiving PA3EGO + 2dB another UK stn = is showing=20 -22 at a shorter distance. A difference of 24 dB
and this station says he is an Expert!! =
 
 
----- Original Message ----- =
From: = mal hamilton
To: rsgb
Sent: Monday, February 18, = 2013 4:42=20 PM
Subject: LF: POOR = ANTENNAS

MF
One thing the wspr DB shows is how = poor some=20 Receivers/Antennas are comparing like with like approximately same = distances from Transmitter.
 
g3kev
=
 


--
http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/
http://www.g3xbm.co.uk
https://sites.google.com/site/sub9khz/
http://qss2.blogspot.com/
http://www.youtube.com/user/g3xbm

=
------=_NextPart_000_0204_01CE0E02.8FA98CA0--