Return-Path: Received: from rly-me07.mx.aol.com (rly-me07.mail.aol.com [172.20.83.41]) by air-me10.mail.aol.com (v121.4) with ESMTP id MAILINME103-9c647a76c3830b; Mon, 04 Feb 2008 14:49:32 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-me07.mx.aol.com (v121.4) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINME072-9c647a76c3830b; Mon, 04 Feb 2008 14:49:14 -0500 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1JM7JG-0005Zx-Jb for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 04 Feb 2008 19:48:54 +0000 Received: from [83.244.159.144] (helo=relay3.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1JM7JF-0005Zo-8z for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 04 Feb 2008 19:48:53 +0000 Received: from qmta09.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.96]) by relay3.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1JM7JA-0007Gj-Ch for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 04 Feb 2008 19:48:53 +0000 Received: from OMTA12.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.44]) by QMTA09.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id lPQs1Y0020x6nqcA90kA00; Mon, 04 Feb 2008 19:48:18 +0000 Received: from amailcenter19.comcast.net ([204.127.225.119]) by OMTA12.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id lXog1Y00M2bBRH08Y00000; Mon, 04 Feb 2008 19:48:41 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=mRyj2wQBQbof+W+5sqkdSw==:17 a=ysiYkyE4AAAA:8 a=pEgaByfhzJPT44uCw54A:9 a=KEt7ytmZTCGKysvCBBQA:7 a=BuMEy6_Kf7pxw0tuiVCyhCCWfNEA:4 a=zUBsD6tbDSsA:10 Received: from [65.96.210.39] by amailcenter19.comcast.net; Mon, 04 Feb 2008 19:48:39 +0000 From: k2ors@comcast.net To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Cc: jcraig@mun.ca Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2008 19:48:39 +0000 Message-Id: <020420081948.2660.47A76C17000AAE6100000A6422120592149C9D01CD05@comcast.net> X-Mailer: AT&T Message Center Version 1 (Oct 30 2007) X-Authenticated-Sender: azJvcnNAY29tY2FzdC5uZXQ= X-Spam-Score: 0.6 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,NO_REAL_NAME=0.55 Subject: Re: LF: [1600m] for Joeo VO1NA X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: listenair ; SPF_helo : n X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: listenair ; SPF_822_from : ? Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Joe, I have been considering putting a signal on near your beacon (1-2Hz away from you ~184.005) with about 250 watts to give potential listeners a propagation indicator and another target to look for. Let me know if you like the idea. -- 73 Warren K2ORS WD2XGJ 136-140kHz WD2XSH/23 505-510kHz WE2XEB/2 160-189kHz WE2XGR/1 505-515kHz FN42hi http://www.w4dex.com/wd2xgj.htm -------------- Original message ---------------------- From: jcraig@mun.ca > Hi Jean-Pierre and Wolf, > > I can understand how the QRM makes it seem futile to receive the very > weak signals, but we have made much progress despite the challenges. > The transmitter will remain in operation if you desire and will be moved > to a frequency of your preference if you can find one with lower noise in > the 160-190 kHz range. When the experiment with the Poldhu club > is finished, we can then try QRSS120 if you are interested. > > 73 and thank-you for the many reports! > > Joe VO1NA >