Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20390 invoked from network); 13 Apr 2000 19:45:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by grants.core.plus.net.uk with SMTP; 13 Apr 2000 19:45:30 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.02 #1) id 12fpRa-0005yQ-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Thu, 13 Apr 2000 20:38:26 +0100 Received: from phobos.unica.co.uk ([208.239.240.147] ident=root) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 12fpRZ-0005yK-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 13 Apr 2000 20:38:25 +0100 Received: from [194.131.244.31] (helo=zork) by phobos.unica.co.uk with asmtp (Exim 3.13 #2) id 12fuyp-0002EN-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 13 Apr 2000 21:33:08 -0400 Message-ID: <01f001bfa57f$b5007940$de46a8c0@unica.co.uk> From: "Peter Bowyer" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <002a01bfa0a2$9b9320c0$0a00a8c0@server1.ThreeLakes.ca> <002f01bfa46a$265d4a80$ba0d01d5@dave> <38F4D6D1.2CC9E7F5@netscapeonline.co.uk> <03b601bfa4ca$aa9f9f40$de46a8c0@unica.co.uk> <38F5FD58.F31665B@netscapeonline.co.uk> Subject: LF: Re: Experimentation etc Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2000 20:37:26 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Changed the subject line - nothing at all to do with Transatlantic II ... G3KEV wrote : > > I am glad Peter that you have joined the debate and I know that you have to be > impartial at all times. Well.. not really, I'm allowed to have opinions. They don't count any more or any less that anyone else's, though, and I wouldn't have it any other way. I don't exercise any control over the content of any of the reflectors we run, except occasionally for technical reasons. > I owned and was the Sysop of GB7KEV a NTS bbs on the East Coast for 8 years. > The volume of traffic at its peak was in excess of 1200 messages each week, a > little more than appears on this medium, so I do know the position. Not sure why that's relevant, but OK. > I give all credit to those that are trying to cross frontiers but why single out > one particular person. I mentioned G4JNT because he is the most prolific poster here on the advanced DSP and coherent integration techniques, and to my knowledge (which may be less than complete) the most advanced experimentor, too. I could probably have gone on to list everyone else who posts here, and all the people who don't, but I'm not sure it would have helped my point. > For instance you forgot to mention MM0ALM who has the most potent signal > eminating from the UK. He has constructed everything in his shack except perhaps > his RX and engineered his antenna farm which includes a number of tower in > excess of 130 feet. That is real amateur involvement and dedication, and he is > not associated in any way with the electronics industry, and does not have > University, Government agencies, or Commercial R and D support. Good for him - that's 100% more than I could ever achieve. More power to his elbow. But what I do is still amateur radio, it's just a different branch of the hobby. (I do contest operating mostly, BTW). > By their own admission some of the radio amateur contributers to the reflector > and participants on LF are using Professional facilities and sophisticated > equipment borrowed from their employers to achieve the object. And if that 'borrowing' is helping those people and other amateurs with their understanding of the bands and modes concerned, why should that pose a problem? This is new stuff, involving new techniques. > I cannot comment about the person above that you mentioned because I have not > heard any signals from him so far on LF, perhaps he is working underground. Nor have I. Not surprising, since I haven't heard any other signals on LF either. But I have read Andy's postings here (and elsewhere on similar topics but implemented on vastly different bands and modes) with great interest and am very keen to read more about their success and development. And those of all the other experimentors here, too. > I can only state my own position by saying that as far as I know, I am the only > one to work and have confirmed 19 countries on 136 khz two way plus 2 xband to > Spain and Channel Is. with my signal on 136 khz. I have swl reports from 4 other > countries excluding the above. Good - congratulations, that's an excellent achievement. You obviously take great pride in what you do, and earn the respect of your peers as a result. Shouldn't others have the same chance to achieve against their own agenda in the same way you have against yours? That way the envelope will be pushed in many directions, making the whole arena richer for all. > We need proof of achievements and not speculation. We 'need' experimentation, which comes in all shapes and sizes. That's what keeps our hobby interesting. I don't do much of it myself, but get great pleasure from being a privileged observer. Peter G4MJS