Return-Path: X-Spam-DCC: paranoid 1290; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=3.1.3 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by paranoid.lipkowski.org (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id sBCFRD5k010017 for ; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 16:27:13 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1XzRyY-0001kV-8B for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 15:17:50 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1XzRyX-0001kM-SF for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 15:17:49 +0000 Received: from resqmta-ch2-01v.sys.comcast.net ([69.252.207.33]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1XzRyV-0000FI-Jx for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 15:17:48 +0000 Received: from resomta-ch2-13v.sys.comcast.net ([69.252.207.109]) by resqmta-ch2-01v.sys.comcast.net with comcast id SfHZ1p0072N9P4d01fHkdX; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 15:17:44 +0000 Received: from Owner ([69.143.126.216]) by resomta-ch2-13v.sys.comcast.net with comcast id SfHj1p00R4gFcuV01fHk7R; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 15:17:44 +0000 X-DKIM-Result: Domain=comcast.net Result=Signature OK From: To: References: <5489EFBC.3050401@abelian.org> <5489F474.4030904@abelian.org> <5489FA44.3010709@abelian.org> <548AA644.4030707@abelian.org> In-Reply-To: <548AA644.4030707@abelian.org> Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 10:17:42 -0500 Message-ID: <01b701d0161e$c6a4bf60$53ee3e20$@comcast.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQG27QdKibxxgl6UdN4kXBl2ENs4QgJM2IBJAbRdsmgBLHxjFJyU7V8g Content-Language: en-us DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20140121; t=1418397464; bh=Nfx4obKLgsFOouSSonmXpPP9ftetWD6lkEi1Rqh1nKY=; h=Received:Received:From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version: Content-Type; b=iV+di9F8jXUpIlvlZuXfjU8xo1ZEd70uFTl/Hi+06moROr6UjKGUciykHZKcVlLhU 7/wMa+boiLHBTGPdXucXQOhd5A/tIJi8/CxIYOOKyQsuk2s6HDS+jJl6Pgoyly3M1i cmHUgrV1yLOE0kvE0PinDUGHqj48VtvQwHyZR6bKagx4kjFI0QK3wug+WTL20q2FlI 2sX4yLt0TgvzGQgbV3FqDpbqMKmpjxN4TcLjhbxXJ+txqhSaOAP4d4ebu9vk+zbgi6 hJOmeBjnIDS3q4SP4PJzBznEf2hAJH0LadlzCob8F/JeQmW+/AUCVLngDc52aBBqUv V3p7GFm262uWg== X-Scan-Signature: c0336009bd9bab526ca27d297ea7579a Subject: RE: VLF: 8819.9 Hz in Virginia? Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 10.1.3.10 Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 1467 Paul, I've been monitoring near 8820 since Dex's prior transmission (assessing and mitigating noise in case Dex switches on again). I don't have good absolute-frequency calibration at this northern Virginia location, and I'm interested in whether the signal captured at Forest (near 8819.9) is the same signal that I have seen almost continuously for the past 6 days (I have seen occasional small frequency shifts that do not seem like utility power line frequency shifts). I tried to correlate the ~0.01Hz delta-f feature shown in your spectrogram link (below), between 1400 UTC and 1700 UTC, with my local spectrogram. This raised a Spectrum Lab question: my spectrogram data was captured at ~ 1mHz resolution (715 uHz bin width), and accordingly I can't quite discern 0.01uHz features (like the one shown in your Forest link) in my waterfall display. Can I inspect previously captured Spectrum Lab data at higher resolution by accessing a data file, or perhaps by opening a new waterfall-display window? Apologies for bothering you with this detail-level question; I wanted to try to correlate my data with the data in your link below while the data is still in my Spectrum Lab buffer, and without corrupting or erasing the data in the attempt to inspect it at higher resolution. 73, Jim AA5BW -----Original Message----- From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Paul Nicholson Sent: Friday, December 12, 2014 3:25 AM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: VLF: 8819.9 Hz in Virginia? Spectrogram covering 24 hours yesterday http://abelian.org/vlf/tmp/141211c.gif A wandering signal from a crystal source of average stability. These are fairly common when you dig deep enough into the noise. Fortunately easy to distinguish from a GPS locked amateur signal. Demonstrates how useless an undisciplined xtal osc is for VLF (tx and rx). -- Paul Nicholson --