Message-ID: <01C23B11.7E8ABEA0.g4jnt@thersgb.net>
From: "A C Talbot" <g4jnt@thersgb.net>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: LF: RE: RE: Re Jason on the DDS
Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2002 17:16:09 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Sender: <majordom@post.thorcom.com>

That would be very helpful.  Now I've added the code to programme the Jason 
increment into EEprom via the 'normal' DDS control, (done this morning 
after sending the last EMail) there are only 60 words of programme memory 
left.  Which gives no scope for any future additions to the DDS software. 
 If the Jason data could come in at 19200 this means I can use all the 
existing serial comms routines and free up more space.

An EMC test using my 700 W PA was nearly a disaster this morning.  A laptop 
with a 'touch screen' mouse did not like being in an E-Field of many 
hundreds of V/m and crashed so it wouldn't even reboot from the keyboard. 
 After re-powering, the diskscan routine reported a corrupt file, but 
fortunately everything seemed to work.  The main computer, in its metal 
case seems happy with this sort of field strength.

Still OK for 1900z tonight (Saturday) fortunately !

Andy  G4JNT


-----Original Message-----
From:	Alberto di Bene [SMTP:dibene@usa.net]
Sent:	2002-08-03 16:14
To:	rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject:	LF: RE: Re Jason on the DDS

> Yes, the initial programming of teh DDS module is exactly as before, at
> 19200 baud, the Jason code is tacked onto the end of the DDSPC5 software
>  with a separate serial comms routine for 9600 operation.

The 9600 bps is not cast in stone. If it can be of help, in the forthcoming 
version
I can add an option for 19200.

73  Alberto  I2PHD