Envelope-to: dave@picks.force9.co.uk Delivery-date: Thu, 21 Apr 2005 18:53:45 +0100 Received: from ptb-spamcore02.plus.net ([192.168.71.3]) by pih-mxcore08.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v1.0) id 1DOfs1-0003zr-B4 for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 18:53:45 +0100 Received: from mailnull by ptb-spamcore02.plus.net with spamcore-l-b (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1DOfvf-000ERu-1N for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 18:57:31 +0100 Received: from [192.168.101.75] (helo=pih-mxcore09.plus.net) by ptb-spamcore02.plus.net with esmtp (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1DOfvd-000ERM-Op for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 18:57:29 +0100 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by pih-mxcore09.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v1.0) id 1DOfrx-00017G-UB for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 18:53:42 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1DOfq7-0003SK-W1 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 18:51:47 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.30] (helo=relay.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1DOfq7-0003SB-KD for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 18:51:47 +0100 Received: from smtp-2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.69]) by relay.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DOfq3-0003Mv-Ns for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 18:51:47 +0100 Received: from [84.13.10.27] (helo=traceydlqceh0p) by smtp-2.opaltelecom.net with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1) id 1DOfpp-0003fO-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 18:51:29 +0100 Received: from 127.0.0.1 (AVG SMTP 7.0.308 [266.9.17]); Thu, 21 Apr 2005 18:51:34 +0100 Message-ID: <017901c5469a$c1e67120$1b0a0d54@traceydlqceh0p> From: "Tracey Gardner" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2005 18:51:07 +0100 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-SPF-Result: relay.thorcom.net: 62.24.128.69 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of talktalk.net X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=failed,none Subject: LF: Longwave Broadcast In Europe Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Spam-Filtered: by PlusNet SpamCORE (v3.00) This request came up on another list, but I thought it likely that someone on this list may be able to Jim. Tracey > For some AES (Audio Engineering Society) standards work I am doing > (on EMC), I need to get a handle on the approximate field strengths > used by long wave broadcast stations (150-250 kHz) in Europe and the > UK. Information on transmitter power and antenna details for US > broadcast stations is available on a public FCC website. Is there a > comparable site for the UK and other EU countries? Does someone here > have direct knowledge of these transmitters? Comparable data for > shortwave broadcasters could also be helpful. > > Please reply off list -- I don't want to burden the list with this > discussion. "Jim Brown" > > Thanks, > > Jim Brown K9YC > -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.9.17 - Release Date: 19/04/2005