Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mb06.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 272613800008A; Mon, 28 May 2012 14:39:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SZ4q9-0007ts-EN for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 28 May 2012 19:38:49 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SZ4q8-0007tj-T9 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 28 May 2012 19:38:48 +0100 Received: from nm23-vm4.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com ([212.82.109.233]) by relay1.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SZ4q6-00060t-Ku for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 28 May 2012 19:38:47 +0100 Received: from [77.238.189.48] by nm23.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 28 May 2012 18:38:44 -0000 Received: from [212.82.108.225] by tm1.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 28 May 2012 18:38:44 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1002.bt.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 28 May 2012 18:38:44 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 639168.99477.bm@omp1002.bt.mail.ird.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 74159 invoked from network); 28 May 2012 18:38:44 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btinternet.com; h=DKIM-Signature:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-Antivirus:X-Antivirus-Status; b=uuxhq29td2VHAtvcDW9U91JykZ4gLBmbdgRvOTGc34Rl6pQy7fS1CTOH/DPGvnwuMDwS7TmpHTAKnUsSrVc67V5oJrNp48SzEtZkCko5diDE63Vnyck7yxMSZqMKtnSROTUCnmYcvxYAaQzRxe+Ux5REeeGAoZckwgvADRKrQLU= ; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=s1024; t=1338230324; bh=s7NJp0py2OagYVPtyEAGJjZ5AlgN1yk33Nn0c/v90+k=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-Antivirus:X-Antivirus-Status; b=m8DXL1H43QHEQW69NiMsbI2TmkWxFHKxGU4UoxEzFShZvI3XfuRNXm0lKgk4tn3YTSEbkLEUUlFdkTnOI/cV8BrCwR6fds8NGcrDtoLUtF8U3q0OSfXtdD2qs392z/isX3ScKRCkjLQDcaoxkB2a5aQzRfTAcsQulwigaxthbuc= X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: SBfoynkVM1kQ5UqQdimN3K51kx_wtdA5TwxXnXYJ6o0b5F_ 87z3YUvjRJWkxybyrCWmrrNr2Rd7zLrDgOSGesFkqkjPwYHy5jfFsWjdQGXq ym8VlXbgAu40sGEJubX1Y1qczUTwo2eg83dcd.Gb73iri3_7SRdZifqqgaib oRsyUE0Y_uWzFmcFa7yrlEib2LvyvVcBLU0dxHYOLOkYzaPLePR49VDljFkI BOhlqZhCwOVCgN8Si8QMTAMEJeGDHT1pOUi_S222Ebi3MX2s1PzFh4OVbqEb IVoLEDHDLQacng6njjm4Bza4MqoQvT9PUkpaUblaG5oX3I3e5eFAg1nVsqnR oibSbgRU4kI_S.3QUnaiaHXPttk3jBHTHGwbRKEm9PfuhPYQp.fPyARSo5GQ w.UWQx8CeEohThJcGDoaV0Lof0Pr4iJ2zAxG.8mEiiskcncOlYW3vzgF9RLE r3KFph7xIi7Hg31LNwilPJvlVoIL6m27pPk5.CU1Gt66XgQq8Z_Cj8sfu3rf bCVWCZ0JufDZCim21iz3JjnfxHcdvV9eAQAYDUXBixUXKRZQxZSY67k6uWC_ pK7FDHP8yyc7Asa4jAQlKJsI37uHPB2H85pzfqYHH.WRUCx2QXHng X-Yahoo-SMTP: fpz.2VeswBBs59bVshRPmMN51lcO2lgFRIvE4XTqE8dRwOxd70E- Received: from lark (alan.melia@109.155.63.143 with login) by smtp824.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 28 May 2012 11:38:44 -0700 PDT Message-ID: <016501cd3d01$453debc0$4001a8c0@lark> From: "Alan Melia" To: References: <4FC39CF3.7020701@legal-medicine.de> <1338226811.63172.YahooMailNeo@web171601.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> Date: Mon, 28 May 2012 19:18:57 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.2001 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.2001 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 120528-0, 28/05/2012), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Peter just a quick butt-in...... dont waste money on noiseless microphone cable! :-)) This is prevent noise on low-level audio signal WHEN THE CABLE IS FLEXED AND TWISTED. It has no advantage is the cable is not moved. There what is called a "tribo-electric effect in cable which is akin to rubbing a plastic rod (or an amber rod if you are old or rich enough :-)) ) which a cats pelt. (or possibly silk) The flexing of the coax (or STP) generates a static charge which varies with movement so generates an audio noise/crackle. Use a tightly twisted pair like you suggested and you can actually pull the centre insulator out of old UR67 or RG213 and pull the twisted pair though that. Cheaper than solid plumbing ! I was first shown that by telephone engineers :-)) [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [212.82.109.233 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY Informational: message has unparseable relay lines 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: bde53fa3678f346afe39dd99e3e185db Subject: Re: LF: VLF/LF-Preamp Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:401476928:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-m262.1 ; domain : btinternet.com DKIM : pass x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d601a4fc3c67e649e X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : temperror Hi Peter just a quick butt-in...... dont waste money on noiseless microphone cable! :-)) This is prevent noise on low-level audio signal WHEN THE CABLE IS FLEXED AND TWISTED. It has no advantage is the cable is not moved. There what is called a "tribo-electric effect in cable which is akin to rubbing a plastic rod (or an amber rod if you are old or rich enough :-)) ) which a cats pelt. (or possibly silk) The flexing of the coax (or STP) generates a static charge which varies with movement so generates an audio noise/crackle. Use a tightly twisted pair like you suggested and you can actually pull the centre insulator out of old UR67 or RG213 and pull the twisted pair though that. Cheaper than solid plumbing ! I was first shown that by telephone engineers :-)) Alan G3NYK ----- Original Message ----- From: "M0FMT" To: Sent: Monday, May 28, 2012 6:40 PM Subject: Re: LF: VLF/LF-Preamp Hi Peter If you are talking about the dc supply cable being both an electromagnetic antenna but also a microphone then I am sure you already know that A/ using a twisted balanced arrangement may cut the first, and B/ spending a load of cash on a specialist microphone cable by say ATM may cut the second http://www.mtraudio.com/atmcables.htm ............. They say " The secret of noiseless microphone cable is to combat both electromagnetic interference and mechanical vibration (microphony). ATM uses a twist technique and high grade lapp shield to reject electro-magnetic interference. The outer jacket material is chosen for resilience and pliability but also has vibration absorbing properties. Internal cotton fillers further reduce microphony. These features combine to give ATM accurate, noise free signal path performance." But a more practical approach may be to twist your own wire in a hand drill (like I do) and feed it through a thin copper pumbing tube then filling the whole thing with that sealing expanding foam (which I don't do). It may work, never tried it myself. Also look at the screen grounding, have the far end un-grounded or visa versa. Thinking about it some more I use microphone cable for my Rig to PC connections stolen from my sons Guitar Kit Its very thick and squashy. That never gives any RF or Microphony issues but that may be just luck. Suggest you migrate to the Yahoo RSGB LF site for a wider discussion group there are more informed people there than me. Any way good luck and let us know how you get on, this cannot be a new issue I am sure. 73 es GL Pete M0FMT IO91UX ________________________________ From: pws To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" Sent: Monday, 28 May 2012, 16:42 Subject: LF: VLF/LF-Preamp Hi, After all those meta-discussions here's a more serious problem: I'm playing around with a new e-field probe based on the INA111. http://www.ti.com/product/ina111 Schematic: http://www.df3lp.de/misc/rx/INA111_preamp.png It's working fine and the local interferences are lower compared to my old non-balanced design running here on balcony. That was the goal. Amplification is quite enough to drive a M-Audio audiophile 192 soundcard. There's a second transformer (1:4) at the af-inputs. The coupling capacitance of those transformers are below 10pF each. I'm using the shields of a thin double coaxial line for bringing up the supply voltage. The voltage splitter is located at the far end inside the small amplifier box. The problem is that I'm observing to a lot of interferences/microphonics "from behind" when touching the battery located inside the house. ??? Peter, df3lp