Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-db01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 3BBB0380000FF; Mon, 4 Jun 2012 14:12:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Sbbkr-0006g4-N7 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 04 Jun 2012 19:11:49 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Sbbkr-0006fv-3V for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 04 Jun 2012 19:11:49 +0100 Received: from out1.ip01ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.237]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1Sbbko-00081Y-Om for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 04 Jun 2012 19:11:47 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgIFAIz5zE9cF/ub/2dsb2JhbABFnlQDlVaBCIITBQEBBQgBAQNJAiwBAQMFAgEDEQQBAQoDCRkUAQQaBhYIBhMKAQICAQENh18DD60KDYlOijFgGoJUgyIDiA2FMJdUgmCBX4E+ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,714,1330905600"; d="scan'208,217";a="393352461" Received: from host-92-23-251-155.as13285.net (HELO xphd97xgq27nyf) ([92.23.251.155]) by out1.ip01ir2.opaltelecom.net with SMTP; 04 Jun 2012 19:11:45 +0100 Message-ID: <016101cd427d$7f76f4e0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> From: "mal hamilton" To: References: <4FCB96A9.4010009@usa.net><4FCB9F34.7040604@legal-medicine.de><4FCBCC8B.9050308@usa.net><77A08BCA-E9AB-404B-B425-BFD3564F66FE@thelortons.co.uk><517B3527-8D27-4E07-853D-653F9AF3E025@thelortons.co.uk><4FCCCB31.4080201@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2012 18:11:43 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: John With my talktalk email account, I cannot access any of the options that you specify. a Gmail account might be different g3kev ----- Original Message ----- From: John Gould To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Sent: Monday, June 04, 2012 3:03 PM Subject: Re: LF: Re: Black Sheep [...] Content analysis details: (0.5 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [62.24.128.237 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FSL_XM_419 Old OE version in X-Mailer only seen in 419 spam -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 FSL_UA FSL_UA 0.5 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_024C2 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_024C2 X-Scan-Signature: fce77e88417377663dedf94f027ec622 Subject: Re: LF: Re: Black Sheep Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_015E_01CD427D.7F400660" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.9 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE, MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:510667552:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40554fccfa913955 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_015E_01CD427D.7F400660 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable John With my talktalk email account, I cannot access any of the options that = you specify. a Gmail account might be different g3kev ----- Original Message -----=20 From: John Gould=20 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Sent: Monday, June 04, 2012 3:03 PM Subject: Re: LF: Re: Black Sheep Stefan, I not sure that you are correct in saying that one needs a yahoo = account. I've subscribed to Yahoo! Groups with my Gmail account and = that worked OK, so you should be able to join the RSGB_LF_Group with = your Heidelberg e-mail account, wait for the membership to be authorised = by one of the moderators, vote and then un-subscribe. =20 I've not run a poll on this list - it was so easy to set up a poll on = the other group that everyone can see who voted and how they voted. =20 73 John, G3WKL On 4 June 2012 15:50, Stefan Sch=E4fer = wrote: Hi Clive, LF, For those who simply subscribed to the list but without having a = yahoo account it is not possible to vote! This situation is advantaging = the pro-yahoo party. Please remind those who are blind for such facts = that there are further members (outside the poll) who want to = codeterminate in this process. My vote is pro blacksheep and i would agree with the 2 group = compromise. As long as the two groups are not treated like competitors, = where one has to win and the other will be shut down after some time. 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 04.06.2012 13:15, schrieb Clive Lorton: If you have voted it is possible to change your vote before the = voting period ends. =20 ------=_NextPart_000_015E_01CD427D.7F400660 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
John
With my talktalk email account,  I cannot = access any=20 of the options that you specify. a Gmail account might be = different
g3kev
 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 John Gould
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2012 = 3:03 PM
Subject: Re: LF: Re: Black = Sheep

Stefan,

I not sure that you are correct in saying that one needs a yahoo = account.=20  I've subscribed to Yahoo! Groups with my Gmail account and that = worked=20 OK, so you should be able to join the RSGB_LF_Group with your = Heidelberg=20 e-mail account, wait for the membership to be authorised by one of the = moderators, vote and then un-subscribe.  

I've not run a poll on this list - it was so easy to set up a = poll on the=20 other group that everyone can see who voted and how they voted. =  

73 John, G3WKL

On 4 June 2012 15:50, Stefan Sch=E4fer <Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> = wrote:
Hi=20 Clive, LF,

For those who simply subscribed to the list but = without=20 having a yahoo account it is not possible to vote! This situation is = advantaging the pro-yahoo party. Please remind those who are blind = for such=20 facts that there are further members (outside the poll) who want to=20 codeterminate in this process.

My vote is pro blacksheep and = i would=20 agree with the 2 group compromise. As long as the two groups are not = treated=20 like competitors, where one has to win and the other will be shut = down after=20 some time.

73, Stefan/DK7FC

Am 04.06.2012 13:15, = schrieb Clive=20 Lorton:
If=20 you have voted it is possible to change your vote before the = voting period=20 ends.
 =20


------=_NextPart_000_015E_01CD427D.7F400660--